| Literature DB >> 32831036 |
Yusuke Takanashi1,2, Kazuhito Funai2, Shumpei Sato1, Akikazu Kawase2, Hong Tao3, Yutaka Takahashi1,4, Haruhiko Sugimura3, Mitsutoshi Setou1,4,5,6, Tomoaki Kahyo7,8, Norihiko Shiiya2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To improve the postoperative prognosis of patients with lung cancer, predicting the recurrence high-risk patients is needed for the efficient application of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, predicting lung cancer recurrence after a radical surgery is difficult even with conventional histopathological prognostic factors, thereby a novel predictor should be identified. As lipid metabolism alterations are known to contribute to cancer progression, we hypothesized that lung adenocarcinomas with high recurrence risk contain candidate lipid predictors. This study aimed to identify candidate lipid predictors for the recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma after a radical surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Lipid; Lung adenocarcinoma; Mass spectrometry; Prognostic factor; Recurrence prediction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32831036 PMCID: PMC7446133 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07306-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Clinicopathological characteristics of the non-recurrent and recurrent groups
| Characteristics | Non-recurrent (n = 10) | Recurrent ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median age (range) | 67.5 (49–75) | 71.5 (67–89) | 0.069 |
| Gender (male/female) | 7/3 | 7/3 | 1.000 |
| Smoking history (+/−) | 7/3 | 6/4 | 1.000 |
| Pathological stage (I/II) | 10/0 | 5/5 | 0.033 |
| Median tumor size (mm) (range) | 23.5 (9–29) | 24 (9–37) | 0.649 |
| Adenocarcinoma subtype | 0.293 | ||
| Lepidic | 2 | 0 | |
| Papillary | 5 | 7 | |
| Acinar | 1 | 2 | |
| Solid | 2 | 1 | |
| Lymph node metastasis (+/−) | 0/10 | 5/5 | 0.033 |
| Pleural invasion (+/−) | 2/8 | 5/5 | 0.350 |
| Lymphatic vessel invasion (+/−) | 1/9 | 6/4 | 0.057 |
| Blood vessel invasion (+/−) | 2/8 | 9/1 | 0.005 |
| Micropapillary component (+/−) | 5/5 | 8/2 | 0.350 |
| Spread through air space (+/−) | 2/8 | 4/6 | 0.628 |
| Driver gene mutation | |||
| EGFR (+/−) | 2/8 | 6/4 | 0.170 |
| ALK (+/−) | 0/8 | 0/7 | – |
| Surgical procedure | 1.000 | ||
| Lobectomy | 10 | 9 | |
| Wedge resection | 0 | 1 | |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 1.000 | ||
| Indication (Stage IA3-IIB) | 8 | 9 | |
| Received | 4 | 4 | |
| Recurrent style | – | ||
| Locoregional | – | 3 | |
| Distant | – | 8 | |
Abbreviations: ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase, EGFR epithelial growth factor receptor
Fig. 1Comparison of total lipid levels between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups. The average total lipid level of the recurrent group was 1.65 times higher than that of the non-recurrent group (P = 0.026)
Fig. 2Volcano plots of 2595 identified lipid species. Each plot represents a lipid species to be identified. The relative amount of 203 lipid species (red plots) were increased (FC ≥ 2.0 = right side of 1 in the horizontal axis, P-value < 0.05 = 1.30 in vertical axis) and that of 4 lipid species (green plots) were decreased (FC ≤0.05 = left side of − 1 in the horizontal axis, P-value < 0.05 = 1.30 in vertical axis) in the recurrent group. Nine increased lipids showing prominent distributions and all 4 decreased lipid species were annotated for candidate predictors (blue arrows). Abbreviations: Cer, ceramide; ChE, cholesterol ester; FC, folding change; Hex1Cer, monohexosylceramide; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; MePC, monoether phosphatidylcholine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphoethanolamine; SM, sphingomyelin; TG, triglyceride
Fig. 3Comparisons of relative amount distributions between the non-recurrent and recurrent groups are shown for increased (a) and decreased (b) lipid species in the recurrent group. Boxplots show the upper 10 percentile, upper quartile, median, lower quartile, and lower 10 percentile. Maximum and minimum values are shown in dots. P-values for significance and FCs are presented for each lipid species. Abbreviations: Cer, ceramide; ChE, cholesterol ester; FC, folding change; Hex1Cer, monohexosylceramide; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; MePC, monoether phosphatidylcholine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphoethanolamine; TG, triglyceride
AUC rank of candidate lipid predictors determined by ROC curve
| Rank* | Species | Cutoff value | AUC (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Cer(d18:0_24:0) | 521,665.875 | 0.85 (0.673–1.000) |
| 5 | PC(18:2_18:2) | 81,938,569.45 | 0.84 (0.654–1.000) |
| 6 | ChE(24:1) | 52,345.314 | 0.83 (0.650–1.000) |
| 7 | PC(41:2) | 33,392.237 | 0.83 (0.645–1.000) |
| 8 | BiotinylPE(30:3) | 6,185,556.894 | 0.83 (0.602–1.000) |
| 9 | LPC(12:0) | 379,006.021 | 0.79 (0.577–1.000) |
| 10 | Hex1Cer(t42:1 + O) | 854,682.452 | 0.79 (0.562–1.000) |
| 11 | MePC(40:8e) | 7,939,029.972 | 0.78 (0.531–1.000) |
| 12 | ChE(20:1) | 66,948.94 | 0.77 (0.549–0.991) |
| 13 | MePC(34:6e) | 1,029,943.584 | 0.77 (0.536–1.000) |
*Lipids with top three AUC were selected as final candidate predictors (boldfaced notations)
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the ROC curve; CI; confidential interval; ROC, receiver operating characteristic
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy among the three final candidate predictors and conventional histopathological prognostic factors
| Predictors for recurrence | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate lipid predictors | |||
| SM(d35:1)* | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.90 |
| Cer(d42:0) | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.80 |
| TG(15:0_14:0_14:0) | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.85 |
| Pathological prognostic factors | |||
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| Blood vessel invasion | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.85 |
*SM(d35:1) showed the most excellent prediction ability
Abbreviations: Cer, ceramide; SM, sphingomyelin; TG, triglyceride