Yuyu He1, Jie Li1, Tomoyuki Koga1, Jun Ma1,2, Sanjay Dhawan1, Yuta Suzuki1, Frank Furnari3, Varun V Prabhu4, Joshua E Allen4, Clark C Chen1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 3. Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA. 4. Oncoceutics Inc, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are ongoing clinical trials exploring the efficacy of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) inhibition against glioblastomas, the most common primary brain tumor. Here we examine potential molecular determinants of this efficacy. METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas glioblastoma database and other published mRNA profiles were used to analyze the DRD2 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression pattern. In vitro and in vivo responses to DRD2 inhibitors were determined using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) glioblastoma models. Immunohistochemical studies were performed on clinically annotated glioblastoma samples derived from patients treated with ONC201. RESULTS: Analysis of clinical glioblastoma specimens derived from independent patient cohorts revealed an inverse correlation between EGFR and DRD2 mRNA expression, with implication that signaling mediated by these proteins shares overlapping functions. In independent panels of PDX glioblastoma lines, high EGFR expression was associated with poor in vitro and in vivo response to DRD2 inhibitors, including haloperidol and ONC201. Moreover, ectopic expression of a constitutively active EGFR, variant (v)III, suppressed glioblastoma sensitivity to ONC201. DRD2 expression positively correlated with expression of rate-limiting enzymes for dopamine synthesis as well as dopamine secretion, suggesting contribution of autocrine DRD2 signaling. Analysis of specimens from patients treated with ONC201 (n = 15) showed an inverse correlation between the intensity of EGFR staining and clinical response. The median overall survival for patients with high and low EGFR staining was 162 and 373 days, respectively (0.037). CONCLUSIONS: High EGFR expression is a determinant of poor glioblastoma response to DRD2. This finding should inform future clinical trial designs.
BACKGROUND: There are ongoing clinical trials exploring the efficacy of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) inhibition against glioblastomas, the most common primary brain tumor. Here we examine potential molecular determinants of this efficacy. METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas glioblastoma database and other published mRNA profiles were used to analyze the DRD2 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression pattern. In vitro and in vivo responses to DRD2 inhibitors were determined using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) glioblastoma models. Immunohistochemical studies were performed on clinically annotated glioblastoma samples derived from patients treated with ONC201. RESULTS: Analysis of clinical glioblastoma specimens derived from independent patient cohorts revealed an inverse correlation between EGFR and DRD2 mRNA expression, with implication that signaling mediated by these proteins shares overlapping functions. In independent panels of PDX glioblastoma lines, high EGFR expression was associated with poor in vitro and in vivo response to DRD2 inhibitors, including haloperidol and ONC201. Moreover, ectopic expression of a constitutively active EGFR, variant (v)III, suppressed glioblastoma sensitivity to ONC201. DRD2 expression positively correlated with expression of rate-limiting enzymes for dopamine synthesis as well as dopamine secretion, suggesting contribution of autocrine DRD2 signaling. Analysis of specimens from patients treated with ONC201 (n = 15) showed an inverse correlation between the intensity of EGFR staining and clinical response. The median overall survival for patients with high and low EGFR staining was 162 and 373 days, respectively (0.037). CONCLUSIONS: High EGFR expression is a determinant of poor glioblastoma response to DRD2. This finding should inform future clinical trial designs.
Authors: Alexander Grinshpoon; Micha Barchana; Alexander Ponizovsky; Irena Lipshitz; Daniella Nahon; Orna Tal; Abraham Weizman; Itzhak Levav Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Varun V Prabhu; Neel S Madhukar; Coryandar Gilvary; C Leah B Kline; Sophie Oster; Wafik S El-Deiry; Olivier Elemento; Faye Doherty; Alexander VanEngelenburg; Jessica Durrant; Rohinton S Tarapore; Sean Deacon; Neil Charter; Jinkyu Jung; Deric M Park; Mark R Gilbert; Jessica Rusert; Robert Wechsler-Reya; Isabel Arrillaga-Romany; Tracy T Batchelor; Patrick Y Wen; Wolfgang Oster; Joshua E Allen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jean-Martin Beaulieu; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Sébastien Marion; Robert J Lefkowitz; Raul R Gainetdinov; Marc G Caron Journal: Cell Date: 2005-07-29 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas R Slaney; Omar S Mabrouk; Kirsten A Porter-Stransky; Brandon J Aragona; Robert T Kennedy Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Frank B Furnari; Tim Fenton; Robert M Bachoo; Akitake Mukasa; Jayne M Stommel; Alexander Stegh; William C Hahn; Keith L Ligon; David N Louis; Cameron Brennan; Lynda Chin; Ronald A DePinho; Webster K Cavenee Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Jie Li; Shan Zhu; David Kozono; Kimberly Ng; Diahnn Futalan; Ying Shen; Johnny C Akers; Tyler Steed; Deepa Kushwaha; Michael Schlabach; Bob S Carter; Chang-Hyuk Kwon; Frank Furnari; Webster Cavenee; Stephen Elledge; Clark C Chen Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2014-02-28
Authors: Erin R Bonner; Sebastian M Waszak; Michael A Grotzer; Sabine Mueller; Javad Nazarian Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 12.300