Literature DB >> 32830436

Different Surgical Strategy for Patients with Cervical Angina: A Potential Role of Luschka's Joint Osteophyte.

Fan Feng1, Xiu-Yuan Chen1, Long Shen2, Quan Li1, Li-Feng Lao1, Hong-Xing Shen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cervical angina is an underrecognized type of noncardiac chest pain and its mechanism of pain remains obscure. The objective of the current study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of different surgical strategies for patients with cervical angina and to analyze the potential pathogenesis of Luschka's joint osteophyte.
METHODS: From February 2013 to March 2018, a prospective study on cervical angina was performed in our hospital. All patients who were diagnosed with both noncardiac chest pain and cervical pathology were identified. During admission, they consulted with a cardiologist and underwent strict cardiac workups to exclude true angina pectoris. The included 41 patients were randomly divided into two groups according to different surgical strategies of whether or not to remove Luschka's joint osteophyte during anterior cervical decompression surgery: the osteophyte resection (OR group) and the nonresection (NR group).
RESULTS: The OR group consisted of 21 patients (8 men and 13 women) with a mean age of 54.7 years (range, 41-65 years). The NR group was composed of 20 patients (9 men and 11 women) with an average age of 56.3 years (range, 43-68 years). Before surgery, the mean duration of symptoms was 6.1 months (range, 4-20 months). The Luschka's joint osteophytes were located at C6 -C7 (19 cases, 46.3%), C5 -C6 (17 cases, 41.5%), and C4 -C5 (4 cases, 12.2%). Their average area was 34.85 mm2 and the average length were 5.09 mm. No statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics were detected between the two groups (P > 0.05). After operation, there were significant improvements in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score and the Neck Disability Index score in both groups (P < 0.05). However, the visual analogue scale score for chest pain in the OR group was statistically lower than that in the NR group (1.4 ± 1.0 vs 2.1 ± 1.6, P < 0.05). In the OR group, the results of cervical spine surgery were excellent in 18 patients (85.7%), and fair in 3 patients (14.3%). In the NR group, there were 10 patients (50.0%) with excellent results, 9 patients with fair results (45.0%), and 1 patient with poor results (5.0%). Notably, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups (χ2 = 6.265, P = 0.044). The average follow-up was 31 months (24-52 months).
CONCLUSION: Anterior cervical decompression surgery with resection of Luschka's joint osteophyte can effectively reduce cervical angina symptom and improve the patient's quality of life. In addition to nerve root compression, Luschka's joint osteophyte may be another pathogenic factor in cervical angina.
© 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cervical decompression; Cervical angina; Luschka's joint osteophyte

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32830436      PMCID: PMC7767664          DOI: 10.1111/os.12751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  24 in total

1.  Spinal cord infarction mimicking angina pectoris.

Authors:  W P Cheshire
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Cervicothoracic angina identified by case history and palpation findings in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Henrik Wulff Christensen; Werner Vach; Anthony Gichangi; Claus Manniche; Torben Haghfelt; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Respiratory manifestations of dorsal spine radiculitis simulating cardiac asthma.

Authors:  D DAVIS
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1950-05       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Cervical angina: a seemingly still neglected symptom of cervical spine disorder?

Authors:  H Nakajima; K Uchida; S Kobayashi; Y Kokubo; T Yayama; R Sato; T Inukai; T Godfrey; H Baba
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  The diagnosis of nonanginal chest pain.

Authors:  J Constant
Journal:  Keio J Med       Date:  1990-09

6.  Cervical angina: an overlooked source of noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  Walter I Sussman; Steven A Makovitch; Shabbir Hussain I Merchant; Jayant Phadke
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2015-01

Review 7.  Cervical instability presenting as thoracic pain: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Benjamin M Zussman; Nelson S Saldua; James S Harrop
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy.

Authors:  H Baba; N Furusawa; S Imura; N Kawahara; H Tsuchiya; K Tomita
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Two to seventeen-year follow-up.

Authors:  S E Emery; H H Bohlman; M J Bolesta; P K Jones
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1.

Authors:  Mitsuru Fukui; Kazuhiro Chiba; Mamoru Kawakami; Shin-Ichi Kikuchi; Shin-Ichi Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Atsushi Seichi; Tadashi Shimamura; Osamu Shirado; Toshihiko Taguchi; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Katsushi Takeshita; Toshikazu Tani; Yoshiaki Toyama; Eiji Wada; Kazuo Yonenobu; Takashi Tanaka; Yoshio Hirota
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 1.601

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.