Literature DB >> 32830337

Improved Transferability of Data-Driven Damage Models Through Sample Selection Bias Correction.

Dennis Wagenaar1,2, Tiaravanni Hermawan1, Marc J C van den Homberg3, Jeroen C J H Aerts1,2, Heidi Kreibich4, Hans de Moel2, Laurens M Bouwer5.   

Abstract

Damage models for natural hazards are used for decision making on reducing and transferring risk. The damage estimates from these models depend on many variables and their complex sometimes nonlinear relationships with the damage. In recent years, data-driven modeling techniques have been used to capture those relationships. The available data to build such models are often limited. Therefore, in practice it is usually necessary to transfer models to a different context. In this article, we show that this implies the samples used to build the model are often not fully representative for the situation where they need to be applied on, which leads to a "sample selection bias." In this article, we enhance data-driven damage models by applying methods, not previously applied to damage modeling, to correct for this bias before the machine learning (ML) models are trained. We demonstrate this with case studies on flooding in Europe, and typhoon wind damage in the Philippines. Two sample selection bias correction methods from the ML literature are applied and one of these methods is also adjusted to our problem. These three methods are combined with stochastic generation of synthetic damage data. We demonstrate that for both case studies, the sample selection bias correction techniques reduce model errors, especially for the mean bias error this reduction can be larger than 30%. The novel combination with stochastic data generation seems to enhance these techniques. This shows that sample selection bias correction methods are beneficial for damage model transfer.
© 2020 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  damage modeling; disaster risk management; domain adaptation; flood risk management; loss modeling; machine learning; sample selection bias correction

Year:  2020        PMID: 32830337      PMCID: PMC7891600          DOI: 10.1111/risa.13575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  9 in total

1.  Future economic damage from tropical cyclones: sensitivities to societal and climate changes.

Authors:  Roger A Pielke
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Uncertainty and sensitivity of flood risk calculations for a dike ring in the south of the Netherlands.

Authors:  Hans de Moel; Laurens M Bouwer; Jeroen C J H Aerts
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Power outage estimation for tropical cyclones: improved accuracy with simpler models.

Authors:  Roshanak Nateghi; Seth Guikema; Steven M Quiring
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Comparison and validation of statistical methods for predicting power outage durations in the event of hurricanes.

Authors:  Roshanak Nateghi; Seth D Guikema; Steven M Quiring
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  High resolution population distribution maps for Southeast Asia in 2010 and 2015.

Authors:  Andrea E Gaughan; Forrest R Stevens; Catherine Linard; Peng Jia; Andrew J Tatem
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Machine learning methods reveal the temporal pattern of dengue incidence using meteorological factors in metropolitan Manila, Philippines.

Authors:  Thaddeus M Carvajal; Katherine M Viacrusis; Lara Fides T Hernandez; Howell T Ho; Divina M Amalin; Kozo Watanabe
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 7.  A Review of Flood Loss Models as Basis for Harmonization and Benchmarking.

Authors:  Tina Gerl; Heidi Kreibich; Guillermo Franco; David Marechal; Kai Schröter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison between Random Forests, Artificial Neural Networks and Gradient Boosted Machines Methods of On-Line Vis-NIR Spectroscopy Measurements of Soil Total Nitrogen and Total Carbon.

Authors:  Said Nawar; Abdul M Mouazen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Predictive risk mapping of an environmentally-driven infectious disease using spatial Bayesian networks: A case study of leptospirosis in Fiji.

Authors:  Helen J Mayfield; Carl S Smith; John H Lowry; Conall H Watson; Michael G Baker; Mike Kama; Eric J Nilles; Colleen L Lau
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-10-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.