Literature DB >> 32830177

Anti-MuSK Positive Myasthenia Gravis with Anti-Lrp4 and Anti-titin Antibodies.

Rika Yamashita1, Mikito Shimizu1, Kousuke Baba1, Goichi Beck1, Makoto Kinoshita1, Tatsusada Okuno1, Osamu Higuchi2, Hideki Mochizuki1.   

Abstract

In addition to muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK), low-density lipoprotein receptor (Lrp4) has recently been discovered to be a novel target antigen among patients with seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG). We herein report the findings of a 62-year-old patient who showed positivity for anti-MuSK, anti-Lrp4, and anti-titin antibodies. The patient developed MG crisis following a 10-year history of intermittent double vision with ptosis, and a 7-year history of dropped head. Our detailed clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic descriptions highlight its unique characteristics of anti-MuSK-antibody positive MG accompanied by anti-Lrp4 and anti-titin antibodies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-Lrp4 antibody; anti-MuSK antibody; anti-titin antibody; myasthenia gravis; steroid pulse therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32830177      PMCID: PMC7835456          DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4957-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med        ISSN: 0918-2918            Impact factor:   1.271


Introduction

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neurological disorder caused by antibodies directed against the neuromuscular junction. Anti-muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies (Abs) are known to be the most common Abs causing MG. It is detected among approximately 80% of patients with MG (1). In 2001, Hoch et al. reported that 70% of AChR-Abs-negative patients with MG possess IgGs with the capacity to bind with muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) (2). MuSK MG predominantly occurs in women with frequent oculobulbar symptoms and such patients are at higher risk of developing MG crises. Anti-low-density lipoprotein receptor-antigen (Lrp4) Abs is a recently discovered novel autoantibody, and its positivity among patients with MG is reported to be 2-50% (3-7). Although a previous study reported the rare coexistence of MuSK and Lrp4 Abs among AChR-Ab-negative patients with MG, its detailed clinical characteristics remain to be elucidated. Anti-striational antibodies such as anti-titin, anti-ryanodine receptor (RyR), and muscular voltage-gated potassium channel-complex (Kv1.4) are also known to be MG-associated antibodies. Anti-titin Abs most frequently coexist in anti-AChR Abs-positive MG and they have been shown to be associated with myositis or cardiomyopathy (8). We herein report the clinical presentations, laboratory characteristics, and therapeutic response of a patient with MG who was positive for anti-MuSK, anti-Lrp4 and anti-titin Abs.

Case Report

A 62-year-old woman had been suffering from intermittent double vision, ptosis, and dropped head since her fifties without undergoing any regular medical examination. One morning, she noticed unprecedented fatigue and respiratory discomfort. In the evening, she became unconscious and was brought in for emergency care. When she arrived at our hospital, she was completely unconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale 1-1-4). Her respiration was also in a state of arrest, and pulse arterial oxygen saturation was not detectable. Her blood pressure was 105/83 mmHg. An arterial blood gas test showed respiratory acidosis (pH 7.054, PCO2 138 mmHg, PO2 123 mmHg, HCO3 36.7 mEq/L, BE 0.8 mmol/L, and lactate concentration 41 mEq/L). An electrocardiogram showed sinus tachycardia. Brain magnetic resonance imaging and chest and abdominal contrast computed tomography (CT) images were normal. Within a few hours after she was placed under artificial ventilation, her consciousness gradually recovered to a normal state. A neurological examination revealed facial and neck flexion weakness. She was not able to close her eyes completely, she also had puffy cheeks, but she could raise her head up from the bed [manual muscle test (MMT) 2/5]. Her ocular movement was limited, especially in the horizontal direction. Bilateral ptosis was also observed. After being extubated, she also showed severe dysphagia. No signs of limb muscle weakness were observed. Her deep tendon reflexes were preserved without any signs of pyramidal involvement. Nerve conduction studies of the median, ulnar, tibial, and sural nerves showed normal results. Repetitive nerve stimulation of the abductor digiti minimi and trapezius muscles was also normal. An electromyogram (EMG) showed early recruitment. Neither fibrillation nor fasciculation potentials were detected. Her cardiac function was also normal. Therefore, a muscle biopsy was performed and revealed myopathic changes. On Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining, mild to moderate fiber size variation was observed without inflammatory cell infiltration. Atrophied fibers were mainly type 2. Slight fibers with internal nuclei and cytochrome oxidase (COX) negative fibers were observed, and the intermyofibrillar network was disorganized (Fig. 1). Anti-MuSK Ab measured by a radioimmunoassay (RIA) was 28.6 nmol/L (normal, <0.02). Anti-Lrp4 Ab measured by luciferase immunoprecipitation systems was 62,568 relative light units (RLU) (positive control, 58,682 RLU). Anti-titin Ab measured by cytometric cell based assay was 1.18 (normal range <1.0). Anti-AChR evaluated by RIA was negative. anti-Kv1.4 Ab, and myositis-associated Abs, such as anti-mitochondria, anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (ARS), anti-Mi-2, anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), and signal recognition particle antibody, were negative. Based on the clinical presentation and positivity of anti-MuSK Abs, the patient was diagnosed with MuSK MG with anti-Lrp4 and anti-titin Abs [Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Class V]. Her serum creatine kinase level was not elevated. Normal chest CT findings indicated the absence of thymoma. Two weeks after the admission, she was able to maintain her respiratory function without ventilator support during the daytime, although her forced lung capacity (FLC) was 53.8%. Her neck flexor strength also persisted (MMT 2), and she was still unable to even swallow even saliva. High-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (1,000 mg daily for 3 days) and oral tacrolimus (3 mg/day) were initiated at 1 month after admission. Her respiratory function gradually recovered after the first steroid pulse therapy, and ventilator support was thereafter completely removed. Additional high-dose steroid therapy was administered twice at 10-day intervals, followed by 10 mg/day of oral prednisolone. After the last steroid pulse therapy, her neck flexion strength gradually recovered (MMT 4), and her FLC recovered to 95.3%, although dysphagia remained. Maintenance therapy was then changed from tacrolimus to cyclosporine (5 mg/kg), in addition to pyridostigmine. After 60 days of admission, she gradually became able to swallow soft foods and was discharged from the hospital 72 days after admission (Fig. 2).
Figure 1.

Muscle pathology. A muscle biopsy from the biceps brachii. a) On Hematoxylin and Eosin staining, mild to moderate fiber size variation without inflammatory cell infiltration is visible. b) On nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide tetrazolium reductase (NADH-TR) staining, disorganized intermyofibrillar network is observed in some fibers. c) On COX & SDH staining, a COX negative fiber is visible.

Figure 2.

Clinical course. mPSL: methylprednisolone, PSL: prednisolone, TAC: tacrolimus, CyA: Cyclosporine A, TPPV: tracheostomy positive pressure ventilation, NIV: non-invasive ventilation, QMG: quantitive myaethenia gravis score, FVC: forced vital capacity

Muscle pathology. A muscle biopsy from the biceps brachii. a) On Hematoxylin and Eosin staining, mild to moderate fiber size variation without inflammatory cell infiltration is visible. b) On nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide tetrazolium reductase (NADH-TR) staining, disorganized intermyofibrillar network is observed in some fibers. c) On COX & SDH staining, a COX negative fiber is visible. Clinical course. mPSL: methylprednisolone, PSL: prednisolone, TAC: tacrolimus, CyA: Cyclosporine A, TPPV: tracheostomy positive pressure ventilation, NIV: non-invasive ventilation, QMG: quantitive myaethenia gravis score, FVC: forced vital capacity

Discussion

We herein describe the case of a MuSK MG patient accompanied by anti-Lrp4 and anti-titin Abs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first detailed report of a case with triple antibody positive MuSK MG. MuSK and Lrp4 are related to agrin/Lrp4/MuSK signaling. Neural agrin induces AChR clustering necessary for neuromuscular junction (NMJ) formation. Agrin binding to Lrp4 and MuSK triggers this signaling pathway (9,10). Agrin binding to Lrp4 has been reported to form a heterodimer, and two of them generate a tetramer that initiates MuSK activation. Lrp4 and MuSK can interact with each other without agrin; however, the interaction is increased by agrin (9,10). The clinical features of anti-MuSK Abs-positive MG are characterized by a female predominance with frequent oculobulbar weakness and high risk of MG crises (11). Jeffery et al. reviewed 110 patients with anti-MuSK Abs-positive MG, and 85% of them were female. Ocular or bulbar symptoms at the onset were present in 79% of these patients. Approximately 85% of patients were classified to have more severe disease than MGFA Class III. MG crises occurred in 28% among the patient cohort. Lrp4 was initially reported to be a novel target antigen in seronegative MG, while accumulating evidence suggests that anti-Lrp4 Abs also becomes positive in other neuromuscular diseases. For example, in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients, anti-Lrp4 Ab positivity is reported to be 23.4% which is apparently a higher rate than that of MG patients (12). In this regard, the pathogenic significance of anti-Lrp4 Ab remains to be elucidated. According to Zisimopoulou et al. (6), patients with MG with anti-Lrp4 Abs tend to present with either ocular or mild generalized symptoms. Although bulbar symptoms are high (66%), 85% of patients with anti-Lrp4 Abs were classified as MGFA Class I or II, and none belonged to MGFA Class V, whereas only 51% and 52% of anti-AChR and anti-MuSK Abs-positive patients with MG were classified as MGFA Class I or II, respectively. These observations suggest that patients with Lrp4-MG have milder symptoms. Patients with Lrp4-MG are commonly treated with pyridostigmine and corticosteroids (6). Anti- Lrp4-Abs coexists with either anti-AChR or anti-MuSK Abs at various degrees according to previous studies. According to Zisimopoulou et al., 7.5% of AChR-MG patients and 14.6% MuSK MG patients possess coexisting serum anti- Lrp4 Abs. Seven out of 8 patients with AChR/Lrp4 MG and all 8 patients with MuSK/Lrp4 MG presented with MGFA Class III or IV. MG crises were observed in 12.5% of patients with AChR/Lrp4 MG and in 62.5% with MuSK/Lrp4. None of the patients with MuSK/Lrp4 MG were accompanied by thymoma or thymic hyperplasia. All of patients with MuSK/Lrp4 MG showed a good or moderate response to pyridostigmine and prednisone treatment, whereas patients with AChR/Lrp4 MG showed a much better response to pyridostigmine. Taken together, MuSK/Lrp4 MG showed relatively severe clinical symptoms, a frequent rate of MG crises, and a good response to pyridostigmine and prednisone, in comparison to AChR/Lrp4 MG (6). Consistent with the previous cohort study, our patient showed MG crisis with severe bulbar symptoms, which effectively responded to high-dose steroid and oral immunosuppressive therapy. In our case, the patient had a 10-year history of MG symptoms. Her symptoms were mild at onset, and then gradually became aggravated. Whether she possessed all Abs from the onset or only one or two Abs at the beginning could not be clarified in our case. It is noteworthy that anti-titin Ab was also found in this case. Anti-titin Abs is one of the anti-striational Abs that mainly appears in anti-AChR Abs-positive MG (8) and has been shown to be associated with myositis or cardiomyopathy. Consistently, EMG and a muscle biopsy revealed myopathic changes in this case, but no infiltration centered on CD8-positive T cell was found, unlike that of previous studies (13). Although T cell infiltration was not evident in our case, anti-titin Ab might have contributed to augment disease severity of MG by accelerating autoimmune reaction not only against neuromuscular junction, but against muscle fibers. It is reported that 40.9% of AChR-MG, 14.6% of MuSK-MG and 16.4% of Lrp4-MG patients possess anti-titin Ab (14). Thus, our case further supports the previous observation that anti-titin Abs occasionally coexist with anti-AChR negative MG. In conclusion, the clinical features of double- or triple-positive patients would help us reveal the clinical spectrum of the disease. Notably, this case showed that not only neuromuscular junctions, but also muscle cell bodies may have been targeted for autoimmune responses in anti-MuSK-Ab positive MG accompanied by anti-Lrp4 and anti-titin antibodies.

The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).
  14 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic use of autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  M Isabel Leite; Patrick Waters; Angela Vincent
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.815

2.  Anti-LRP4 autoantibodies in AChR- and MuSK-antibody-negative myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  Alexandra Pevzner; Benedikt Schoser; Katja Peters; Nicoleta-Carmen Cosma; Andromachi Karakatsani; Berthold Schalke; Arthur Melms; Stephan Kröger
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Anti-MuSK antibody myasthenia gravis: clinical findings and response to treatment in two large cohorts.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Guptill; Donald B Sanders; Amelia Evoli
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Auto-antibodies to the receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK in patients with myasthenia gravis without acetylcholine receptor antibodies.

Authors:  W Hoch; J McConville; S Helms; J Newsom-Davis; A Melms; A Vincent
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Autoantibodies to lipoprotein-related protein 4 in patients with double-seronegative myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; John S Tzartos; Maria Belimezi; Samia Ragheb; Beverly Bealmear; Richard A Lewis; Wen-Cheng Xiong; Robert P Lisak; Socrates J Tzartos; Lin Mei
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2011-12-12

6.  Autoantibodies to low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 in myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  Osamu Higuchi; Johko Hamuro; Masakatsu Motomura; Yuji Yamanashi
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Autoimmune targets of heart and skeletal muscles in myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  Shigeaki Suzuki; Kimiaki Utsugisawa; Hiroaki Yoshikawa; Masakatsu Motomura; Shiro Matsubara; Kazumasa Yokoyama; Yuriko Nagane; Takahiro Maruta; Takashi Satoh; Hideki Sato; Masataka Kuwana; Norihiro Suzuki
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2009-09-14

8.  Lrp4 is a receptor for Agrin and forms a complex with MuSK.

Authors:  Natalie Kim; Amy L Stiegler; Thomas O Cameron; Peter T Hallock; Andrea M Gomez; Julie H Huang; Stevan R Hubbard; Michael L Dustin; Steven J Burden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  A comprehensive analysis of the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of anti-LRP4 in myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  P Zisimopoulou; P Evangelakou; J Tzartos; K Lazaridis; V Zouvelou; R Mantegazza; C Antozzi; F Andreetta; A Evoli; F Deymeer; G Saruhan-Direskeneli; H Durmus; T Brenner; A Vaknin; S Berrih-Aknin; M Frenkian Cuvelier; T Stojkovic; M DeBaets; M Losen; P Martinez-Martinez; K A Kleopa; E Zamba-Papanicolaou; T Kyriakides; A Kostera-Pruszczyk; P Szczudlik; B Szyluk; D Lavrnic; I Basta; S Peric; C Tallaksen; A Maniaol; S J Tzartos
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 7.094

10.  LRP4 antibodies in serum and CSF from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients.

Authors:  John S Tzartos; Paraskevi Zisimopoulou; Michael Rentzos; Nikos Karandreas; Vasiliki Zouvelou; Panagiota Evangelakou; Anastasios Tsonis; Thomas Thomaidis; Giuseppe Lauria; Francesca Andreetta; Renato Mantegazza; Socrates J Tzartos
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.511

View more
  2 in total

1.  Myopathy or Myasthenia Positive for Antibodies Against MuSK, Lrp4, and Titin.

Authors:  Josef Finsterer; Marlies Frank
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 1.271

2.  Reply to: Myopathy in Myasthenia Positive for Antibodies Against MuSK, Lrp4, and Titin.

Authors:  Rika Yamashita; Tatsusada Okuno; Hideki Mochizuki
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 1.271

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.