Rian M Hasson1, Kayla A Fay2, Joseph D Phillips3, Timothy M Millington4, David J Finley5. 1. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, 1 Medical Center Drive, NH 03756, Lebanon; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 1 Medical Center Drive, NH 03756, Lebanon. Electronic address: rian.m.hasson@hitchcock.org. 2. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 1 Medical Center Drive, NH 03756, Lebanon. Electronic address: kayla.a.fay@hitchcock.org. 3. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, 1 Medical Center Drive, NH 03756, Lebanon. Electronic address: joseph.d.phillips@hitchcock.org. 4. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, 1 Medical Center Drive, NH 03756, Lebanon. Electronic address: timothy.m.millington@hitchcock.org. 5. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, 1 Medical Center Drive, NH 03756, Lebanon. Electronic address: david.j.finley@hitchcock.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rural populations face many health disadvantages compared to urban areas. There is a critical need to better understand the current lung cancer screening landscape in these communities to identify targeted areas to improve the impact of this proven tool. METHODS: Data from the County Health Rankings of New Hampshire and Vermont was reviewed for population density, distribution of adult smokers, and level of education compared to the distribution of Lung Cancer Screening Facilities throughout these two states. RESULTS: Screening programs in southern counties of Vermont with lower levels of education have decreased access. In New Hampshire, there are no programs within 30 miles of the areas with the largest distribution of smokers, and decreased access in some areas with the lowest levels of education. CONCLUSIONS: Improving equitable access to high-quality screening services in rural regions and the creation of targeted interventions to address decreased access in areas of high tobacco use and low education is vital to decreasing the incidence of latestage presentations of lung cancer within these populations.
BACKGROUND: Rural populations face many health disadvantages compared to urban areas. There is a critical need to better understand the current lung cancer screening landscape in these communities to identify targeted areas to improve the impact of this proven tool. METHODS: Data from the County Health Rankings of New Hampshire and Vermont was reviewed for population density, distribution of adult smokers, and level of education compared to the distribution of Lung Cancer Screening Facilities throughout these two states. RESULTS: Screening programs in southern counties of Vermont with lower levels of education have decreased access. In New Hampshire, there are no programs within 30 miles of the areas with the largest distribution of smokers, and decreased access in some areas with the lowest levels of education. CONCLUSIONS: Improving equitable access to high-quality screening services in rural regions and the creation of targeted interventions to address decreased access in areas of high tobacco use and low education is vital to decreasing the incidence of latestage presentations of lung cancer within these populations.
Authors: Tri Le; Stacie Miller; Emily Berry; Sarah Zamarripa; Aurelio Rodriguez; Benjamin Barkley; Asha Kandathil; Cecelia Brewington; Keith E Argenbright; David E Gerber Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 5.532