Gabriele Gallo1, E S van Tuyll van Serooskerken2, S H A J Tytgat2, D C van der Zee2, C M G Keyzer-Dekker3, S Zwaveling4, J B F Hulscher5, H Groen6, M Y A Lindeboom2. 1. Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: g.gallo@umcg.nl. 2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85090, 3508, AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, P. O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, P.O. Box 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Assessing quality of life (QoL) after esophageal replacement (ER) for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). METHODS: All patients after ER for LGEA with gastric pull-up (GPU n = 9) or jejunum interposition (JI n = 14) at the University Medical Center Groningen and Utrecht (1985-2007) were included. QoL was assessed with 1) gastrointestinal-related QoL using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI)), 2) general QoL (Child Health questionnaire CHF87-BREF (children)/World Health Organization questionnaire WHOQOL-BREF (adults)), and 3) health-related QoL (HRQoL) (TNO AZL TACQoL/TAAQoL). Association of morbidity (heartburn, dysphagia, dyspnea on exertion, recurrent cough) and (HR)QoL was evaluated. RESULTS: Six patients after GPU (75%) and eight patients after JI (57%) responded to the questionnaires (mean age 15.7, SD 5.9, 12 male, two female). Mean gastrointestinal, general and health-related QoL total scores of the patients were comparable to healthy controls. However, young adults reported a worse physical functioning (p = 0.02) but better social functioning compared to peers (p = 0.01). Morbidity was not associated with significant differences in (HR)QoL. CONCLUSIONS: With the current validated QoL most patients after ER with GPU and JI for LGEA have normal generic and disease specific QoL scores. Postoperative morbidity does not seem to influence (HR)QoL. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: Assessing quality of life (QoL) after esophageal replacement (ER) for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). METHODS: All patients after ER for LGEA with gastric pull-up (GPU n = 9) or jejunum interposition (JI n = 14) at the University Medical Center Groningen and Utrecht (1985-2007) were included. QoL was assessed with 1) gastrointestinal-related QoL using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI)), 2) general QoL (Child Health questionnaire CHF87-BREF (children)/World Health Organization questionnaire WHOQOL-BREF (adults)), and 3) health-related QoL (HRQoL) (TNO AZL TACQoL/TAAQoL). Association of morbidity (heartburn, dysphagia, dyspnea on exertion, recurrent cough) and (HR)QoL was evaluated. RESULTS: Six patients after GPU (75%) and eight patients after JI (57%) responded to the questionnaires (mean age 15.7, SD 5.9, 12 male, two female). Mean gastrointestinal, general and health-related QoL total scores of the patients were comparable to healthy controls. However, young adults reported a worse physical functioning (p = 0.02) but better social functioning compared to peers (p = 0.01). Morbidity was not associated with significant differences in (HR)QoL. CONCLUSIONS: With the current validated QoL most patients after ER with GPU and JI for LGEA have normal generic and disease specific QoL scores. Postoperative morbidity does not seem to influence (HR)QoL. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.