Literature DB >> 32829660

Microdissection of the Human Renal Nervous System: Implications for Performing Renal Denervation Procedures.

Arturo García-Touchard1,2,3, Eva Maranillo1,2,3, Blanca Mompeo1,2,3, José Ramón Sañudo1,2,3.   

Abstract

Despite the use of renal denervation to treat hypertension, the anatomy of the renal nervous system remains poorly understood. We performed a detailed quantitative analysis of the human renal nervous system anatomy with the goal of optimizing renal denervation procedural safety and efficacy. Sixty kidneys from 30 human cadavers were systematically microdissected to quantify anatomic variations in renal nerve patterns. Contrary to current clinical perception, not all renal innervation followed the main renal artery. A significant portion of the renal nerves (late arriving nerves) frequently reached the kidney (73% of the right kidney and 53% of the left kidney) bypassing the main renal artery. The ratio of the main renal artery length/aorta-renal hilar distance proved to be a useful variable to identify the presence/absence of these late arriving nerves (odds ratio, 0.001 (95% CI, 0.00002-0.0692; P: 0.001) with a cutoff of 0.75 (sensitivity: 0.68, specificity: 0.83, area under ROC curve at threshold: 0.76). When present, polar arteries were also highly associated with the presence of late arriving nerve. Finally, the perivascular space around the proximal main renal artery was frequently occupied by fused ganglia from the solar plexus (right kidney: 53%, left kidney: 83%) and/or by the lumbar sympathetic chain (right kidney: 63%, left kidney: 60%). Both carried innervation to the kidneys but importantly also to other abdominal and pelvic organs, which can be accidentally denervated if the proximal renal artery is targeted for ablation. These novel anatomic insights may help guide future procedural treatment recommendations to increase the likelihood of safely reaching and destroying targeted nerves during renal denervation procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  denervation; hypertension; kidney; renal artery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32829660     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  5 in total

1.  Renal Denervation in Hypertensive Patients: Back to Anatomy?

Authors:  Alexandre Persu; Frédéric Maes; Jean Renkin; Atul Pathak
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Reply.

Authors:  Yahui Liu; Chuanyu Gao
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 3.  Present Evidence of Determinants to Predict the Efficacy of Renal Denervation.

Authors:  Hao Zhou; Yanping Xu; Weijie Chen; Liang Wang; Huaan Du; Hang Liu; Zhiyu Ling; Yuehui Yin
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.434

4.  Histological evidence supporting the durability of successful radiofrequency renal denervation in a normotensive porcine model.

Authors:  Andrew S P Sharp; Stefan Tunev; Markus Schlaich; David P Lee; Aloke V Finn; Julie Trudel; Douglas A Hettrick; Felix Mahfoud; David E Kandzari
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.776

Review 5.  Device-Based Sympathetic Nerve Regulation for Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Le Li; Zhao Hu; Yulong Xiong; Yan Yao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.