Literature DB >> 32829442

Grazing Pressure Is Independent of Prey Size in a Generalist Herbivorous Protist: Insights from Experimental Temperature Gradients.

Marco J Cabrerizo1,2, Emilio Marañón3,4.   

Abstract

Grazing by herbivorous protists contributes to structuring plankton communities through its effect on the growth, biomass, and competitiveness of prey organisms and also impacts the transfer of primary production towards higher trophic levels. Previous evidence shows that heterotrophic processes (grazing rates, g) are more sensitive to temperature than autotrophic ones (phytoplankton growth rates, μ) and also that small cells tend to be more heavily predated than larger ones; however, it remains unresolved how the interplay between changes in temperature and cell size modulates grazing pressure (i.e., g:μ ratio). We addressed this problem by conducting an experiment with four phytoplankton populations, from pico- to microphytoplankton, over a 12 °C gradient and in the presence/absence of a generalist herbivorous protist, Oxyrrhis marina. We found that highest g rates coincided with highest μ rates, which corresponded to intermediate cell sizes. There were no significant differences in either μ or g between the smallest and largest cell sizes considered. The g:μ ratio was largely independent of cell size and C:N ratios, and its thermal dependence was low although species-specific differences were large. We suggest that the similar g:μ found could be the consequence that the energetic demand imposed by rising temperatures would be a more important issue than the mechanical constriction to ingestion derived from prey cell size. Despite the difficulty of quantifying μ and g in natural planktonic communities, we suggest that the g:μ ratio is a key response variable to evaluate thermal sensitivity of food webs because it gives a more integrative view of trophic functioning than both rates separately.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activation energy; Microzooplankton; Oxyrrhis marina; Phytoplankton growth; Predator-prey relationship

Year:  2020        PMID: 32829442     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-020-01578-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  15 in total

1.  Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate.

Authors:  J F Gillooly; J H Brown; G B West; V M Savage; E L Charnov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A global pattern of thermal adaptation in marine phytoplankton.

Authors:  Mridul K Thomas; Colin T Kremer; Christopher A Klausmeier; Elena Litchman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Unimodal size scaling of phytoplankton growth and the size dependence of nutrient uptake and use.

Authors:  Emilio Marañón; Pedro Cermeño; Daffne C López-Sandoval; Tamara Rodríguez-Ramos; Cristina Sobrino; María Huete-Ortega; José María Blanco; Jaime Rodríguez
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Strain-specific functional and numerical responses are required to evaluate impacts on predator-prey dynamics.

Authors:  Zhou Yang; Chris D Lowe; Will Crowther; Andy Fenton; Phillip C Watts; David J S Montagnes
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Do marine phytoplankton follow Bergmann's rule sensu lato?

Authors:  Ulrich Sommer; Kalista H Peter; Savvas Genitsaris; Maria Moustaka-Gouni
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2016-03-30

6.  Why Do Phytoplankton Evolve Large Size in Response to Grazing?

Authors:  Pedro Branco; Martijn Egas; Spencer R Hall; Jef Huisman
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Herbivorous protist growth and grazing rates at in situ and artificially elevated temperatures during an Arctic phytoplankton spring bloom.

Authors:  Susanne Menden-Deuer; Caitlyn Lawrence; Gayantonia Franzè
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Trophic interactions modify the temperature dependence of community biomass and ecosystem function.

Authors:  Jessica Garzke; Stephanie J Connor; Ulrich Sommer; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Phytoplankton growth and stoichiometric responses to warming, nutrient addition and grazing depend on lake productivity and cell size.

Authors:  Marika A Schulhof; Jonathan B Shurin; Steven A J Declerck; Dedmer B Van de Waal
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Marine phytoplankton temperature versus growth responses from polar to tropical waters--outcome of a scientific community-wide study.

Authors:  Philip W Boyd; Tatiana A Rynearson; Evelyn A Armstrong; Feixue Fu; Kendra Hayashi; Zhangxi Hu; David A Hutchins; Raphael M Kudela; Elena Litchman; Margaret R Mulholland; Uta Passow; Robert F Strzepek; Kerry A Whittaker; Elizabeth Yu; Mridul K Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.