Literature DB >> 32829215

Psychosocial consequences of transitioning into informal caregiving in male and female caregivers: Findings from a population-based panel study.

Larissa Zwar1, Hans-Helmut König2, André Hajek2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to investigate the psychosocial consequences of transitioning into informal caregiving, and to investigate this association in male and female caregivers with a longitudinal design. Longitudinal panel data from the population-based German Ageing Survey (wave 2014, 2017) were used. The complete sample included up to 13,333 observations (N = 8658) pooled over waves 2014 and 2017. In total, 2.56% of the complete sample transitioned into informal caregiving (N = 547). Individuals who transitioned into informal caregiving, were on average aged 66 years and 54.48% of these participants were female. Well-established scales were used to assess the psychosocial outcomes of network size, loneliness and social isolation, depressive symptoms, as well as positive and negative affect. Transitioning into informal caregiving was used as the main predictor. Sociodemographic characteristics and physical health were controlled for. Results of fixed effects regression analyses showed that transitioning into informal caregiving was significantly associated with increased network size (b = 0.35, p < 0.05), increased depressive symptoms (b = 0.63, p < 0.05) and increased negative affect (b = 0.08, p < 0.001). When stratifying the sample by gender, the results showed increased network size (b = 0.43, p < 0.05), depressive symptoms (b = 0.93, p < 0.01), and loneliness (b = 0.06, p < 0.05) among male caregivers, while female caregivers reported increased negative affect (b = 0.10, p < 0.001). The study's results extend previous research by showing that transitioning into informal caregiving is mainly associated with negative psychological outcomes. Additional analyses suggest that female and male caregivers experience different psychosocial consequences. Thus, gender should be taken into consideration when investigating informal care and its outcomes, and support should be tailored specifically to the needs of female and male caregivers.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort study; Fixed-effects regression; Gender; Informal caregiving; Loneliness; Longitudinal; Male caregivers; Mental health

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32829215     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  Conspiracy mentality among informal caregivers as a risk factor for caregiver burden, mental health, perceived loneliness and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings of a representative online study from Germany.

Authors:  Larissa Zwar; Hans-Helmut König; André Hajek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.440

2.  Elderly Caregivers' Awareness of Caregiving Health Risks.

Authors:  Shimon Amar; Aya Biderman; Sara Carmel; Yaacov G Bachner
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Associations between occupational balance, subjective health, and well-being of informal caregivers of older persons based on a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anna Röschel; Christina Wagner; Mona Dür
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.070

4.  Informal caregiving for adults, loneliness and social isolation: a study protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  André Hajek; Benedikt Kretzler; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic perceive additional burden: findings from an ad-hoc survey in Germany.

Authors:  Andrea Budnick; Christian Hering; Simon Eggert; Christian Teubner; Ralf Suhr; Adelheid Kuhlmey; Paul Gellert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Informal Caregiving, Loneliness and Social Isolation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  André Hajek; Benedikt Kretzler; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Informal care and the impact on depression and anxiety among Swedish adults: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Marlene Stratmann; Yvonne Forsell; Jette Möller; Yajun Liang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Take a sad song and make it better: Spousal activity limitations, caregiving, and depressive symptoms among couples.

Authors:  Sae Hwang Han; Kyungmin Kim; Jeffrey A Burr
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Examination of validity, reliability, and interpretability of a self-reported questionnaire on Occupational Balance in Informal Caregivers (OBI-Care) - A Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Anna Röschel; Christina Wagner; Mona Dür
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.