Literature DB >> 32828930

Experience-dependent modulation of the visual evoked potential: Testing effect sizes, retention over time, and associations with age in 415 healthy individuals.

Mathias Valstad1, Torgeir Moberget2, Daniël Roelfs3, Nora B Slapø3, Clara M F Timpe2, Dani Beck2, Geneviève Richard3, Linn Sofie Sæther3, Beathe Haatveit3, Knut Andre Skaug4, Jan Egil Nordvik5, Christoffer Hatlestad-Hall6, Gaute T Einevoll7, Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen8, Lars T Westlye2, Erik G Jönsson9, Ole A Andreassen3, Torbjørn Elvsåshagen10.   

Abstract

Experience-dependent modulation of the visual evoked potential (VEP) is a promising proxy measure of synaptic plasticity in the cerebral cortex. However, existing studies are limited by small to moderate sample sizes as well as by considerable variability in how VEP modulation is quantified. In the present study, we used a large sample (n = 415) of healthy volunteers to compare different quantifications of VEP modulation with regards to effect sizes and retention of the modulation effect over time. We observed significant modulation for VEP components C1 (Cohen's d = 0.53), P1 (d = 0.66), N1 (d=-0.27), N1b (d=-0.66), but not P2 (d = 0.08), and in three clusters of total power modulation, 2-4 min after 2 Hz prolonged visual stimulation. For components N1 (d=-0.21) and N1b (d=-0.38), as well for the total power clusters, this effect was retained after 54-56 min, by which time also the P2 component had gained modulation (d = 0.54). Moderate to high correlations (0.39≤ρ≤0.69) between modulation at different postintervention blocks revealed a relatively high temporal stability in the modulation effect for each VEP component. However, different VEP components also showed markedly different temporal retention patterns. Finally, participant age correlated negatively with C1 (χ2=30.4), and positively with P1 modulation (χ2=13.4), whereas P2 modulation was larger for female participants (χ2=15.4). There were no effects of either age or sex on N1 and N1b potentiation. These results provide strong support for VEP modulation, and especially N1b modulation, as a robust measure of synaptic plasticity, but underscore the need to differentiate between components, and to control for demographic confounders.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32828930     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  3 in total

1.  Long-Term Potentiation-Like Visual Synaptic Plasticity Is Negatively Associated With Self-Reported Symptoms of Depression and Stress in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Trine Waage Rygvold; Christoffer Hatlestad-Hall; Torbjørn Elvsåshagen; Torgeir Moberget; Stein Andersson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  Sensory-Induced Human LTP-Like Synaptic Plasticity - Using Visual Evoked Potentials to Explore the Relation Between LTP-Like Synaptic Plasticity and Visual Perceptual Learning.

Authors:  Lilly Lengali; Johannes Hippe; Christoffer Hatlestad-Hall; Trine Waage Rygvold; Markus Handal Sneve; Stein Andersson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Evidence for Reduced Long-Term Potentiation-Like Visual Cortical Plasticity in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Mathias Valstad; Daniël Roelfs; Nora B Slapø; Clara M F Timpe; Ahsan Rai; Anna Maria Matziorinis; Dani Beck; Geneviève Richard; Linn Sofie Sæther; Beathe Haatveit; Jan Egil Nordvik; Christoffer Hatlestad-Hall; Gaute T Einevoll; Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen; Marit Haram; Torill Ueland; Trine V Lagerberg; Nils Eiel Steen; Ingrid Melle; Lars T Westlye; Erik G Jönsson; Ole A Andreassen; Torgeir Moberget; Torbjørn Elvsåshagen
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 9.306

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.