Literature DB >> 32828779

Comprehensive Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Diastolic Dysfunction Grading Shows Very Good Agreement Compared With Echocardiography.

João G Ramos1, Alexander Fyrdahl1, Björn Wieslander1, Simon Thalén1, Gert Reiter2, Ursula Reiter3, Ning Jin4, Eva Maret1, Maria Eriksson1, Kenneth Caidahl5, Peder Sörensson6, Andreas Sigfridsson1, Martin Ugander7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to develop a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) approach to diastolic dysfunction (DD) grading and to evaluate the accuracy of CMR in the diagnosis of DD compared with echocardiography.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular DD is routinely assessed using echocardiography.
METHODS: Consecutive clinically referred patients (n = 46; median age 59 years; interquartile range: 46 to 68 years; 33% women) underwent both conventional echocardiography and CMR. CMR diastolic transmitral velocities (E and A) and myocardial tissue velocity (e') were measured during breath-hold using a validated high-temporal resolution radial sector-wise golden-angle velocity-encoded sequence. CMR pulmonary artery pressure was estimated from 4-dimensional flow analysis of blood flow vortex duration in the pulmonary artery. CMR left atrial volume was measured using the biplane long-axis area-length method. Both CMR and echocardiographic data were used to perform blinded grading of DD according to the 2016 joint American and European recommendations.
RESULTS: Grading of DD by CMR agreed with that by echocardiography in 43 of 46 cases (93%), of which 9% were normal, 2% indeterminate, 63% grade 1 DD, 4% grade 2 DD, and 15% grade 3 DD. There was a very good categorical agreement, with a weighted Cohen kappa coefficient of 0.857 (95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 1.00; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive CMR protocol for grading DD encompassing diastolic blood and myocardial velocities, estimated pulmonary artery pressure, and left atrial volume showed very good agreement with echocardiography.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diastolic dysfunction; echocardiography; magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2020        PMID: 32828779     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  4 in total

1.  The heart as a spring, the measurement of myocardial bounce to assess left ventricular function on cardiac MR.

Authors:  Erica Qiao; Kathan Amin; Daniel S Hippe; Eric V Krieger; Theodore J Dubinsky
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Four-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular diastolic function.

Authors:  Zakariye Ashkir; Saul Myerson; Stefan Neubauer; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Tino Ebbers; Betty Raman
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 3.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Clement Lau; Mohamed M M Elshibly; Prathap Kanagala; Jeffrey P Khoo; Jayanth Ranjit Arnold; Sandeep Singh Hothi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 4.  Ten things to know about ten imaging studies: A preventive cardiology perspective ("ASPC top ten imaging").

Authors:  Harold E Bays; Amit Khera; Michael J Blaha; Matthew J Budoff; Peter P Toth
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.