Literature DB >> 32827750

Ultrasound frequency of sonication applied in microbiological diagnostics has a major impact on viability of bacteria causing PJI.

Piotr Dudek1, Aleksandra Grajek2, Jacek Kowalczewski3, Grzegorz Madycki4, Dariusz Marczak3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sonication of explanted prosthesis constitutes an element of microbiological diagnostics. The aim of performing this procedure is to remove biofilm and to increase sensitivity of diagnostics. Ultrasound used in medical purposes are low-frequency and low-intensity. With this wide range of frequency which can be used in sonication process it is necessary to find the golden mean between biofilm dislodging and planktonic bacteria sparing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to determine the least harming low-intensity ultrasound frequency (35 kHz, 40 kHz or 53 kHz) used during sonication process with other parameters constant. Four bacteria species were examined: S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae. Number of microbiological studies (n) for each group (g) counted 40 specimens (based on scheme 1 bacteria type - 4 groups, 40 studies each).
RESULTS: A detailed analysis of gathered data was conducted. Based on study findings following conclusions were drawn. Sonication has a significant and negative impact on survival of sonicated planktonic bacteria. Part of bacteria in planktonic state are damaged/killed by ultrasound, which is demonstrated by lower CFU count in sonicated samples versus control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimal ultrasound frequencies for sonication of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli are 35 kHz and 40 kHz. Ultrasound frequencies used in sonication process (35 kHz, 40 kHz, 53 kHz) of E. coli showed same impact on bacteria survival. It is crucial to perform further assessment of ultrasound parameters on clinical effects of sonication used in PJI diagnostics.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacteria; periprosthetic joint infection; sonication; ultrasound frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32827750     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1201-9712            Impact factor:   3.623


  4 in total

1.  Tissue sampling is non-inferior in comparison to sonication in orthopedic revision surgery.

Authors:  Theresa Fritsche; Matthias Schnetz; Alexander Klug; Sebastian Fischer; Christian Ruckes; K P Hunfeld; Reinhard Hoffmann; Yves Gramlich
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Ultrasonic pre-treatment of Bacillus velezensis for improved electrogenic response in a single chambered microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Aman Dongre; Rakesh Kumar Sharma; Monika Sogani; Nitesh Kumar Poddar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  Is sonication superior to dithiothreitol in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsikopoulos; Savas Ilias Christofilos; Dimitrios Kitridis; Konstantinos Sidiropoulos; Panagiotis N Stoikos; Christoforos Gravalidis; Panagiotis Givissis; Paraskevi Papaioannidou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Time-dependent behavior of the Staphylococcus aureus biofilm following exposure to cold atmospheric pressure plasma.

Authors:  Foad Fahmide; Parastoo Ehsani; Seyed Mohammad Atyabi
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.699

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.