Literature DB >> 32827304

What Is the Learning Curve for New Technologies in Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Review.

Nana O Sarpong1, Carl L Herndon1, Michael B Held1, Alexander L Neuwirth1, Thomas R Hickernell1, Jeffrey A Geller1, H John Cooper1, Roshan P Shah2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The adaptation of new technology in joint replacement surgery is often associated with a learning curve, as performance tends to improve with experience. The purpose of this review is to define the learning curve and its relevance to joint replacement surgery in the setting of new technological advances, and to draw analogies with the learning curve of basic surgical training. RECENT
FINDINGS: Assessing a surgeon's learning curve for a new technology is complicated and difficult. With every learning curve, the first patients subjected to the novel technology may be at higher risk for adverse events until the learning curve is overcome and a steady state is reached. While measures of performance can be clear and direct in some professions, learning curves with new technology in total joint arthroplasty have been difficult to quantify. Most attempts measure surgical learning curves via an evaluation of the surgical process or patient outcomes. There are published results of both process (i.e., operative time, accuracy of implant position) and outcome measures (i.e., complication rate, revision rate) utilized as proxy for performance during learning curves. We review the concept of the learning curve in joint replacement surgery, highlighting examples of learning curves with adaptation of new technologies, and conclude with a discussion of dilemmas and challenges.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Learning curve; Operating room; Orthopedic devices; Technology; Training

Year:  2020        PMID: 32827304      PMCID: PMC7661627          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-020-09671-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  28 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies. A systematic review.

Authors:  C R Ramsay; A M Grant; S A Wallace; P H Garthwaite; A F Monk; I T Russell
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Richard Noel de Steiger; Michelle Lorimer; Michael Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Anterior-supine minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: defining the learning curve.

Authors:  Brian E Seng; Keith R Berend; Andrew F Ajluni; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  The Learning Curve by Operative Time for Soft Tissue Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Electronic Sensor Technology.

Authors:  Akshay Lakra; Nana O Sarpong; Emma L Jennings; Matthew J Grosso; H John Cooper; Roshan P Shah; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  B Kayani; S Konan; J R T Pietrzak; S S Huq; J Tahmassebi; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 6.  Learning Curves in Arthroplasty in Orthopedic Trainees.

Authors:  Obinna Nzeako; Diane Back
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  The direct anterior minimal invasive approach in total hip replacement: a prospective departmental study on the learning curve.

Authors:  Ole-Christian L Brun; Lukas Månsson; Lars Nordsletten
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Internet Promotion of Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty by Members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.

Authors:  Ademola I Shofoluwe; Neal B Naveen; Avinash Inabathula; Mary Ziemba-Davis; R Michael Meneghini; John J Callaghan; Lucian C Warth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Patricia Katz; Miriam Cisternas; Linda Ono; Michael D Ries; Jonathan Showstack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach.

Authors:  Y M den Hartog; S B W Vehmeijer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of a novel imageless navigation system reduced fluoroscopy exposure and improved acetabular positioning in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Christian B Ong; Yu-Fen Chiu; Ajay Premkumar; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.067

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.