Melvin T Donaldson1, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer2, Joseph E Gaugler3, Erik J Groessl4,5, Shannon M Kehle-Forbes6, Melissa A Polusny6, Erin E Krebs6. 1. Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Minnesota Medical School. 2. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health. 3. Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 4. VA San Diego Healthcare System. 5. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA. 6. Minneapolis VA Healthcare System and University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to examine differences in yoga practice between persons with and without chronic pain. Secondarily, we describe use of the Essential Properties of Yoga Questionnaire, Short Form (EPYQ-SF) for self-report. DESIGN: Participants were members of an existing cohort of veterans who completed a 2015-2016 survey focused on pain and nonpharmacological health practices. Cohort members who reported yoga in the past year [n=174 (9.4%) of 1850] were eligible for the present study, which used multiple-contact mixed-mode survey methodology to collect data on yoga practices. The EPYQ-SF was used to assess properties and context of yoga practice. Practice patterns were compared for participants with and without chronic pain. To explore potential reasons for reported yoga practice patterns, focused semistructured interviews were conducted with a subset of participants. RESULTS: Of 174 participants contacted, 141 (82%) returned the yoga questionnaire and 110 (78% of respondents) were still practicing yoga. Among yoga practitioners, 41 (37%) had chronic pain. Practitioners with chronic pain reported gentler (2.8 vs. 3.1, 5-point scale) and less active (2.9 vs. 3.3) yoga practice than those without. Those with chronic pain attended yoga studios less frequently and reported shorter yoga practices than those without. Most yoga practice was self-directed and at home. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in yoga practice of persons with and without chronic pain have implications for implementation of yoga interventions for chronic pain. Future interventions should focus on alternative individual delivery formats or addressing barriers to group practice among people with chronic pain.
OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to examine differences in yoga practice between persons with and without chronic pain. Secondarily, we describe use of the Essential Properties of Yoga Questionnaire, Short Form (EPYQ-SF) for self-report. DESIGN: Participants were members of an existing cohort of veterans who completed a 2015-2016 survey focused on pain and nonpharmacological health practices. Cohort members who reported yoga in the past year [n=174 (9.4%) of 1850] were eligible for the present study, which used multiple-contact mixed-mode survey methodology to collect data on yoga practices. The EPYQ-SF was used to assess properties and context of yoga practice. Practice patterns were compared for participants with and without chronic pain. To explore potential reasons for reported yoga practice patterns, focused semistructured interviews were conducted with a subset of participants. RESULTS: Of 174 participants contacted, 141 (82%) returned the yoga questionnaire and 110 (78% of respondents) were still practicing yoga. Among yoga practitioners, 41 (37%) had chronic pain. Practitioners with chronic pain reported gentler (2.8 vs. 3.1, 5-point scale) and less active (2.9 vs. 3.3) yoga practice than those without. Those with chronic pain attended yoga studios less frequently and reported shorter yoga practices than those without. Most yoga practice was self-directed and at home. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in yoga practice of persons with and without chronic pain have implications for implementation of yoga interventions for chronic pain. Future interventions should focus on alternative individual delivery formats or addressing barriers to group practice among people with chronic pain.
Authors: Amir Qaseem; Timothy J Wilt; Robert M McLean; Mary Ann Forciea; Thomas D Denberg; Michael J Barry; Cynthia Boyd; R Dobbin Chow; Nick Fitterman; Russell P Harris; Linda L Humphrey; Sandeep Vijan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Julia E Keosaian; Chelsey M Lemaster; Danielle Dresner; Margo E Godersky; Ruth Paris; Karen J Sherman; Robert B Saper Journal: Complement Ther Med Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 2.446
Authors: L E Kazis; D R Miller; J Clark; K Skinner; A Lee; W Rogers; A Spiro; S Payne; G Fincke; A Selim; M Linzer Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 1998-03-23
Authors: Erik J Groessl; Meghan Maiya; A Rani Elwy; Kristen E Riley; Andrew J Sarkin; Susan V Eisen; Tosca Braun; Ian Gutierrez; Luwam Kidane; Crystal L Park Journal: Int J Yoga Therap Date: 2015
Authors: R Jay Schulz-Heik; Hilary Meyer; Louise Mahoney; Michael V Stanton; Rachael H Cho; Danae P Moore-Downing; Timothy J Avery; Laura C Lazzeroni; Joanne M Varni; Linda Martin Collery; Peter J Bayley Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: Melvin T Donaldson; Melissa A Polusny; Rich F MacLehose; Elizabeth S Goldsmith; Emily M Hagel Campbell; Lynsey R Miron; Paul D Thuras; Erin E Krebs Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: Barbara G Bokhour; Justeen Hyde; Benjamin Kligler; Hannah Gelman; Lauren Gaj; Anna M Barker; Jamie Douglas; Rian DeFaccio; Stephanie L Taylor; Steven B Zeliadt Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 3.734