OBJECTIVES: To validate the use of a brief suicide risk screening tool, the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) instrument, in pediatric inpatient medical and surgical settings. METHODS: Pediatric patients (10-21 years) hospitalized on inpatient medical and surgical units were recruited through convenience sampling for participation in a cross-sectional instrument validation study. The Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire was used as a standard criterion to validate the ASQ. Patient opinions about screening and parent consent to enroll in a suicide risk screening study were assessed to determine the feasibility of administering the ASQ in this venue. RESULTS: A total of 600 pediatric medical inpatients were screened. Compared with the gold standard, the ASQ had strong psychometric properties, with a sensitivity of 96.67% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.78 to 99.92), a specificity of 91.05% (95% CI: 88.40 to 93.27), a negative predictive value of 99.81% (95% CI: 98.93 to 99.99), and an area under curve of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97). Only 3 participants (0.5%) had acute positive screen results on the ASQ, endorsing current suicidal ideation, whereas 77 participants (12.8%) screened nonacute positive, and 48 participants (8.0%) reported a past suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: The brief 4-item ASQ is a valid tool to detect elevated suicide risk in pediatric medical and surgical inpatients. Our findings also reveal that screening is feasible in terms of detection of suicidal thoughts and behaviors and is acceptable to parents and patients.
OBJECTIVES: To validate the use of a brief suicide risk screening tool, the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) instrument, in pediatric inpatient medical and surgical settings. METHODS: Pediatric patients (10-21 years) hospitalized on inpatient medical and surgical units were recruited through convenience sampling for participation in a cross-sectional instrument validation study. The Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire was used as a standard criterion to validate the ASQ. Patient opinions about screening and parent consent to enroll in a suicide risk screening study were assessed to determine the feasibility of administering the ASQ in this venue. RESULTS: A total of 600 pediatric medical inpatients were screened. Compared with the gold standard, the ASQ had strong psychometric properties, with a sensitivity of 96.67% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.78 to 99.92), a specificity of 91.05% (95% CI: 88.40 to 93.27), a negative predictive value of 99.81% (95% CI: 98.93 to 99.99), and an area under curve of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97). Only 3 participants (0.5%) had acute positive screen results on the ASQ, endorsing current suicidal ideation, whereas 77 participants (12.8%) screened nonacute positive, and 48 participants (8.0%) reported a past suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: The brief 4-item ASQ is a valid tool to detect elevated suicide risk in pediatric medical and surgical inpatients. Our findings also reveal that screening is feasible in terms of detection of suicidal thoughts and behaviors and is acceptable to parents and patients.
Authors: Lisa M Horowitz; Jeffrey A Bridge; Stephen J Teach; Elizabeth Ballard; Jennifer Klima; Donald L Rosenstein; Elizabeth A Wharff; Katherine Ginnis; Elizabeth Cannon; Paramjit Joshi; Maryland Pao Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2012-12
Authors: Charles W Mathias; R Michael Furr; Arielle H Sheftall; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Paige Crum; Donald M Dougherty Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2012-04-30
Authors: Laura Kann; Tim McManus; William A Harris; Shari L Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Barbara Queen; Richard Lowry; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Jemekia Thornton; Connie Lim; Denise Bradford; Yoshimi Yamakawa; Michelle Leon; Nancy Brener; Kathleen A Ethier Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2018-06-15
Authors: Elizabeth D Ballard; Mary Cwik; Kathryn Van Eck; Mitchell Goldstein; Clarissa Alfes; Mary Ellen Wilson; Jane M Virden; Lisa M Horowitz; Holly C Wilcox Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2017-02
Authors: Anne E Rhodes; Saba Khan; Michael H Boyle; Lil Tonmyr; Christine Wekerle; Deborah Goodman; Jennifer Bethell; Bruce Leslie; Hong Lu; Ian Manion Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Jordan E DeVylder; Taylor C Ryan; Mary Cwik; Mary Ellen Wilson; Samantha Jay; Paul S Nestadt; Mitchell Goldstein; Holly C Wilcox Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-10-02
Authors: Lisa M Horowitz; Jeffrey A Bridge; Mary V Tipton; Ted Abernathy; Annabelle M Mournet; Deborah J Snyder; Elizabeth C Lanzillo; Daniel Powell; Michael Schoenbaum; Khyati Brahmbhatt; Maryland Pao Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2022-03 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Lynsay Ayer; Lisa M Horowitz; Lisa Colpe; Nathan J Lowry; Patrick C Ryan; Edwin Boudreaux; Virna Little; Stephen Erban; Soett Ramirez-Estrada; Michael Schoenbaum Journal: J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry Date: 2022-05-23
Authors: Jananee Rasiah; Stephen Freedman; Lee Macdonald; Kassi Prisnie; Mohamed Eltorki; Yaron Finkelstein; Gareth Hopkin; Maria-Jose Santana; Jennifer Thull-Freedman; Antonia Stang; Matthew Prebeg; Isabelle J Gagnon; Margaret Steele; Ahmed Mater; Laurence Katz; Brian Greenfield; Laurie Plotnick; Suneeta Monga; Ellen Louise Lipman; Bruce Wright; Gina Dimitropoulos; Robert Porter; Katrina Hurley; Yazid N Al Hamarneh; Amanda Newton Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Laika D Aguinaldo; Shayla Sullivant; Elizabeth C Lanzillo; Abigail Ross; Jian-Ping He; Andrea Bradley-Ewing; Jeffrey A Bridge; Lisa M Horowitz; Elizabeth A Wharff Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Lisa M Horowitz; Annabelle M Mournet; Elizabeth Lanzillo; Jian-Ping He; Daniel S Powell; Abigail M Ross; Elizabeth A Wharff; Jeffrey A Bridge; Maryland Pao Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 7.830
Authors: Margaret Ngai; Kathleen Delaney; Barbara Limandri; Kristin Dreves; Mary V Tipton; Lisa M Horowitz Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs Date: 2021-06-10