| Literature DB >> 32825472 |
Sheng Cheng1, Liqun Liu1,2, Ke Li1,2.
Abstract
Being an interactive process, the success of risk communication needs to ensure the individuals' right to know and influence their attitudes and perceptions of risk. Ubiquitous social media have expanded risk communication channels and innovated ways of risk communication. At the same time, uncertainty also arises with the diversity and variety of social media. Taking the rainstorm disaster in China as an example, this study focuses on factors affecting the individuals' continuance intention of information seeking on Weibo (a social media platform similar to Twitter). Based on 377 valid respondents, this study applied an extended expectation-confirmation model (ECM), from which the results of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) suggested that continuance intention is positively influenced by factors including effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and satisfaction. Among them, satisfaction contributes the most, which helps maintain a balance between performance expectancy and continuance intention. Taking the individuals' continuance intention to seek information on Weibo as the clue, this research provides government agencies with practical advice on how to use social media for more efficient risk communication during disasters and establish emergency preplans to respond to natural disasters.Entities:
Keywords: Weibo; continuance intention; expectation–confirmation model; rainstorms; risk communication; risk management; satisfaction
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32825472 PMCID: PMC7503377 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Theoretical model and hypotheses.
Demographic profile of the respondents.
| Characteristic | Frequency | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 153 | 40.6 |
| Female | 224 | 59.4 | |
| Age | Under 18 | 0 | 0 |
| 18–25 | 185 | 49.1 | |
| 26–30 | 94 | 24.9 | |
| 31–40 | 68 | 18.0 | |
| 41–50 | 25 | 6.6 | |
| 51–60 | 4 | 1.1 | |
| Over 60 | 1 | 0.3 | |
| Education level | Below high school | 10 | 2.7 |
| College | 35 | 9.3 | |
| Bachelor | 179 | 47.5 | |
| Master | 140 | 37.1 | |
| Doctor | 13 | 3.4 | |
Factor loadings, Cronbach’s α, composite reliability, and average variance extracted (AVE).
| Construct | Items | Outer Loading | Cronbach’s α | Composite Reliability | AVE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Expectancy (PE) | PE1 | 0.845 | 0.788 | 0.876 | 0.702 |
| PE2 | 0.816 | ||||
| PE3 | 0.851 | ||||
| Effort Expectancy (EE) | EE1 | 0.791 | 0.780 | 0.858 | 0.602 |
| EE2 | 0.765 | ||||
| EE3 | 0.798 | ||||
| EE4 | 0.749 | ||||
| Social Influence (SI) | SI1 | 0.886 | 0.833 | 0.900 | 0.822 |
| SI2 | 0.826 | ||||
| SI3 | 0.884 | ||||
| Facilitating Conditions (FC) | FC1 | 0.844 | 0.803 | 0.883 | 0.715 |
| FC2 | 0.839 | ||||
| FC3 | 0.854 | ||||
| Confirmation (CON) | CON1 | 0.845 | 0.805 | 0.885 | 0.720 |
| CON2 | 0.826 | ||||
| CON3 | 0.874 | ||||
| Satisfaction (SAT) | SAT1 | 0.905 | 0.783 | 0.902 | 0.822 |
| SAT2 | 0.908 | ||||
| Continuance Intention (CI) | CI1 | 0.844 | 0.816 | 0.891 | 0.731 |
| CI2 | 0.854 | ||||
| CI3 | 0.868 |
Discriminant validity through the heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT).
| Constructs | PE | EE | SI | FC | CON | SAT | CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 0.838 | ||||||
| EE | 0.704 | 0.776 | |||||
| SI | 0.537 | 0.486 | 0.866 | ||||
| FC | 0.602 | 0.648 | 0.392 | 0.846 | |||
| CON | 0.623 | 0.664 | 0.611 | 0.628 | 0.849 | ||
| SAT | 0.640 | 0.606 | 0.535 | 0.563 | 0.710 | 0.906 | |
| CI | 0.646 | 0.648 | 0.604 | 0.592 | 0.737 | 0.747 | 0.855 |
Figure 2Results of the structural model analysis.
Path coefficients (direct effect).
| Relationship | Beta | Standard Deviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1: PE → CI | 0.081 | 0.062 | 1.298 ns | 0.194 |
| H2: EE → CI | 0.153 | 0.062 | 2.481 ** | 0.013 |
| H3: SI → CI | 0.213 | 0.042 | 5.083 *** | 0.000 |
| H4: FC → CI | 0.124 | 0.058 | 2.159 ** | 0.031 |
| H5: SAT → CI | 0.418 | 0.063 | 6.695 *** | 0.000 |
| H6: PE → SAT | 0.278 | 0.068 | 4.121 *** | 0.000 |
| H7: EE → SAT | 0.096 | 0.069 | 1.397 ns | 0.162 |
| H8: CON → SAT | 0.472 | 0.062 | 7.636 *** | 0.000 |
| H9: CON → PE | 0.623 | 0.042 | 14.913 *** | 0.000 |
Note: ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01, ns = not significant (p > 0.10) (two-tail).
Path coefficients (specific indirect effects).
| Paths | Beta | Standard Deviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON → PE → CI | 0.051 | 0.040 | 1.284 ns | 0.199 |
| EE → SAT → CI | 0.042 | 0.027 | 1.592 ns | 0.112 |
| PE → SAT → CI | 0.113 | 0.030 | 3.779 *** | 0.000 |
Note: *** p < 0.01, ns = not significant (p > 0.10) (two-tail).