| Literature DB >> 32824103 |
Tetiana Ilina1, Weronika Skowrońska2, Natalia Kashpur3, Sebastian Granica2, Agnieszka Bazylko2, Alla Kovalyova1, Olga Goryacha1, Oleh Koshovyi1.
Abstract
Extracts from aerial parts of G. aparine (cleavers) constitute a herbal remedy with monography in British Herbal Pharmacopeia. On the European market, there are several drugs and food supplements consisting of Galium extracts. In folk medicine, cleavers was used topically in Europe, Asia, and the Americas to treat skin diseases. In several remedies, cleavers is also listed as an immunomodulatory active herb influencing the defense response of the human body. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunostimulatory activity and antioxidant potential in vitro of a raw infusion of cleavers and bioactive fractions. The functional activity of lymphocytes in the reaction of the lymphocyte blast transformation (RLBT) method was used for immunomodulatory activity assays and direct scavenging of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), nitric oxide (NO), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was chosen for the examination of antioxidant activity. It was shown that both the raw extract and fractions show significant immunostimulatory and scavenging activities. The obtained data partially justify the traditional use of cleavers as topical remedy for skin infections and for wounds.Entities:
Keywords: Galium aparine; antioxidant activity; cleavers; immunomodulatory activity; polyphenols; skin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32824103 PMCID: PMC7464609 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25163721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
The content of main groups of phytochemicals in G. aparine herb aqueous extract.
| Substances | Extraction Yield (mg/g) | Content (μg/mg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polysaccharides | Hydroxycinnamic Derivates | Flavonoids | Polyphenols | ||
| Aqueous extract | 283.9 ± 14.1 | 96.3 ± 4.8 | 18.7 ± 0.9 a | 2.6 ± 0.1 a | 13.3 ± 0.6 a |
| PPC | 187.6 ± 14.1 | - | 28.6 ± 0.6 b | 3.6 ± 0.1 b | 19.2 ± 0.5 b |
Note: PPC = polyphenolic complex, different letters a, b—show statistical significance p < 0.05.
Figure 1Representative UHPLC-DAD-MS3 chromatogram at 350, 325 and 240 nm.
UHPLC-DAD-MS and quantification data of aqueous extract and PPC fraction.
| No | Identification | Retention Time (min) | UV-Vis Maxima (nm) | MS− Ions | MS2− Ions | MS3− Ions | Content in RAW Extract (µg/mg) | Content in PCC Fraction (µg/mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | monotropein t | 4.8 | 238 | 389 | 183, 165, 153b, 137 | 5.270 ± 0.160 | 8.120 ± 0.112 | |
| 2 | desacetyloasperulosidic acid t | 11.0 | 239 | 389 | 371, | 183b, 165 | 1.960 ± 0.030 | 3.064 ± 0.064 |
| 3 | 3- | 16.3 | 300sh, 324 | 353 | 191b, 179, 173, 135 | - | 0.966 ± 0.016 | 1.384 ± 0.098 |
| 4 | asperulosidic acid t | 20.9 | 237 | 431 | 371, | 225, 165b | 0.524 ± 0.006 | 0.806 ± 0.021 |
| 5 | 3- | 22.4 | 300sh, 324 | 353 | 191b, 179, 173 | - | 0.080 ± 0.001 | 0.121 ± 0.004 |
| 6 | 5- | 23.0 | 301sh, 324 | 353 | 179b, 164 | 4.680 ± 0.080 | 7.124 ± 0.112 | |
| 7 | 4- | 24.8 | 300sh, 325 | 353 | 179, 173b | 1.140 ± 0.020 | 1.754 ± 0.062 | |
| 8 | 5- | 27.4 | 299sh, 324 | 353 | 191b | - | 0.191 ± 0.019 | 0.289 ± 0.011 |
| 9 | quercetin 3- | 29.1 | 260, 352 | 771 | 343, 301b, 271, 255, 179 | 0.096 ± 0.003 | 0.140 ± 0.002 | |
| 10 | kaempferol | 32.5 | 261, 342 | 755 | 533, 285b, 267, 257, 240 | n.q. | n.q. | |
| 11 | quercetin 3- | 41.4 | 261, 353 | 609 | 465, 343, 301b | 343, 301b, 255 | 0.064 ± 0.002 | 0.098 ± 0.007 |
| 12 | 3,4- | 46.4 | 301sh, 325 | 515 | 191, 179, 173b, 135 | 0.095 ± 0.004 | 0.143 ± 0.009 | |
| 13 | 3,5- | 47.4 | 300sh, 324 | 515 | 353b | 191b, 179, 173 | 0.092 ± 0.006 | 0.150 ± 0.011 |
t—tentative assignment based on literature reports on Galium species, c—assignment according to Clifford et al. [22,23], s—comparison with chemical standard was made, n.q.—not quantified, in bold—ion subjected to MS3 fragmentation.
The effect of aqueous extract and other substances from G. aparine on the indices of lymphocyte blast transformation (X ± m), n = 5.
| Extract | Extract Concentration (μg/mL) | RLBT, % |
|---|---|---|
| Aqueous extract | 150 | 60.8 ± 3.2 * |
| 250 | 65.5 ± 3.3 * | |
| 500 | 61.6 ± 3.5 * | |
| PPC | 150 | 37.6 ± 2.6 * |
| 250 | 39.8 ± 2.6 * | |
| 500 | 36.3 ± 2.3 * | |
| PSC | 150 | 48.7 ± 3.5 # |
| 250 | 58.6 ± 3.2 * | |
| 500 | 55.7 ± 3.3 * | |
| PC | 150 | 39.0 ± 3.2 * |
| 250 | 52.7 ± 4.1 * | |
| 500 | 59.3 ± 3.1 * | |
| PHA | 250 | 48.1 ± 2.1 # |
| Spontaneous RLBT | - | 8.5 ± 0.7 |
Note: PPC = polyphenolic complex; PSC = polysaccharide complex; PC = pectin; PHA = phytohemagglutinin; RLBT = the reaction of lymphocyte blast transformation; *, #—p < 0.05 in comparison with PHA, different markers indicate statistically significant differences.
Figure 2Scavenging activity of raw extract and BAFs against DPPH (A), H2O2 (B) and NO (C) species, AA—ascorbic acid (positive control). *, **—significant stronger activity in comparison to the control at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively, a—not significant difference between the tested extracts activity at p < 0.05.