Literature DB >> 32823229

Retrospective analysis of real-world data to determine clinical outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer following cell-free circulating tumor DNA genomic profiling.

Russell Madison1, Alexa B Schrock2, Emily Castellanos3, Jeffrey P Gregg2, Jeremy Snider3, Siraj M Ali2, Vincent A Miller2, Gaurav Singal2, Brian M Alexander2, Jeffrey M Venstrom2, Jon H Chung2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Liquid biopsy and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are increasingly used for detection of targetable genomic alterations (GA) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To examine the clinical outcomes for patients following CGP using liquid biopsy versus tissue biopsy, receipt of matched targeted therapy post-CGP and associated outcomes were evaluated in the real-world setting.
METHODS: 6491 patients with NSCLC and liquid biopsy (N = 937 tests) and/or tissue (N = 5582 tests) CGP were included in a de-identified commercial clinico-genomic database. Targetable GAs included National Comprehensive Cancer Network NSCLC guideline biomarkers. Clinical characteristics, real-world progression, and real-world response (rwR) were obtained via technology-enabled abstraction of clinician notes and radiology/pathology reports.
RESULTS: At the time of liquid biopsy CGP, 53% (496/937) of patients were documented to have received ≥1 line of prior therapy (tissue CGP: 13%, 735/5582). 90% (832/928) of liquid biopsy cases had evidence of ctDNA. A targetable GA was detected in 20% (188/937) of liquid biopsy and 22% (1215/5582) of tissue CGP cases. Use of matched targeted therapy overall was similar post-liquid biopsy or post-tissue CGP but varied considerably across emerging (25%, 79/317) versus standard of care (SOC) (74%, 475/640) GA. Real-world-progression free survival for patients receiving SOC first line matched targeted therapy administered following liquid biopsy (n = 33) and tissue (n = 229) CGP were similar (13.8 vs 10.6 months; aHR = 0.68 [0.36-1.26]). Among patients evaluated for rwR, overall response rate (partial/complete response) to matched targeted therapy post-liquid biopsy CGP was 75% (39/52) versus 66% post-tissue CGP (254/385, P = 0.51).
CONCLUSION: Retrospective analysis of real-world clinico-genomic data demonstrated that clinical outcomes on matched targeted therapy were similar following liquid biopsy and tissue CGP in NSCLC, which suggests routine clinical use of liquid biopsy CGP can reliably guide therapy selection.
Copyright © 2020 Foundation Medicine, Inc. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liquid biopsy; Real-world data; Targeted therapy; ctDNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32823229     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  9 in total

1.  Clinical and analytical validation of FoundationOne®CDx, a comprehensive genomic profiling assay for solid tumors.

Authors:  Coren A Milbury; James Creeden; Wai-Ki Yip; David L Smith; Varun Pattani; Kristi Maxwell; Bethany Sawchyn; Ole Gjoerup; Wei Meng; Joel Skoletsky; Alvin D Concepcion; Yanhua Tang; Xiaobo Bai; Ninad Dewal; Pei Ma; Shannon T Bailey; James Thornton; Dean C Pavlick; Garrett M Frampton; Daniel Lieber; Jared White; Christine Burns; Christine Vietz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Genomic Profiling Assays in Adult Solid Tumors for Precision Oncology: Recent Advancements and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Hiu Ting Chan; Yoon Ming Chin; Siew-Kee Low
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review.

Authors:  Diego Cortinovis; Umberto Malapelle; Fabio Pagni; Alessandro Russo; Giuseppe Luigi Banna; Elisa Sala; Christian Rolfo
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07

4.  Clinical Outcomes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Other Targeted Therapies Based on Tumor Versus Plasma Genomic Profiling.

Authors:  Hai T Tran; Vincent K Lam; Yasir Y Elamin; Lingzhi Hong; Rivka Colen; Nabil A Elshafeey; Islam S A Hassan; Mehmet Altan; George R Blumenschein; Waree Rinsurongkawong; Melvin J Rivera; Mayra E Vasquez; Brett W Carter; Lauren E Byers; Anne S Tsao; Don L Gibbons; Frank Fossella; Bonnie S Glisson; Jianjun Zhang; John V Heymach
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-08-05

5.  Identifying subtypes of depression in clinician-annotated text: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Benson Kung; Maurice Chiang; Gayan Perera; Megan Pritchard; Robert Stewart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Real-World Clinical Outcomes after Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Steven Olsen; Jiemin Liao; Hidetoshi Hayashi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Earlier extracranial progression and shorter survival in ALK-rearranged lung cancer with positive liquid rebiopsies.

Authors:  Petros Christopoulos; Steffen Dietz; Arlou K Angeles; Stephan Rheinheimer; Daniel Kazdal; Anna-Lena Volckmar; Florian Janke; Volker Endris; Michael Meister; Mark Kriegsmann; Thomasz Zemojtel; Martin Reck; Albrecht Stenzinger; Michael Thomas; Holger Sültmann
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05

Review 8.  Liquid Profiling for Cancer Patient Stratification in Precision Medicine-Current Status and Challenges for Successful Implementation in Standard Care.

Authors:  Verena Haselmann; Maren Hedtke; Michael Neumaier
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-19

9.  Liquid profiling of circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer: steps needed to achieve its full clinical value as standard care.

Authors:  Maren Hedtke; Rodrigo Pessoa Rejas; Matthias F Froelich; Volker Ast; Angelika Duda; Laura Mirbach; Victor Costina; Uwe M Martens; Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz; Michael Neumaier; Verena Haselmann
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.449

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.