Literature DB >> 32822930

Comparison of adsorption and desorption of triclosan between microplastics and soil particles.

Xian Chen1, Xuanning Gu2, Lijing Bao3, Shanshan Ma4, Yinghui Mu5.   

Abstract

Microplastic (MP) pollution in soil has been becoming an emerging environmental hot spot, but little is known about the interaction between MPs and chemical contaminants in soil. In this study, batch experiments were performed to study adsorption-desorption behavior and mechanism of triclosan (TCS) on MPs, polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS), and soil particles. PE showed the highest adsorption rate (29.3 mg μg-1 h-1) and equilibrium capacity (1248 μg g-1), while the similar profiles between PS (0.27 mg μg-1 h-1 and 1033 μg g-1, respectively) and soil (0.60 mg μg-1 h-1 and 961 μg g-1, respectively). Two adsorption stages, representing liquid-film and intra-particle diffusion were observed obviously for PE. Adsorption isotherm results revealed that the interaction between MPs and TCS was relatively weak. The sorption potential of soil was lower than that of MPs especially at high concentrations. PE addition induced TCS sorption increase in soil, while PS had no significant (P > 0.05) influence. For MP-soil systems, TCS preferred to adsorb on MPs, which was more pronounced for PE than PS. The desorption rate of TCS was the highest for soil, followed by PE and PS, while equilibrium release amount ranked: PE > PS > soil. Moreover, soil solution better facilitated the desorption, with the amount increasing by 38% for PE compared with 0.01 M CaCl2 solution. Therefore, MPs, especially PE with high adsorption and desorption potentials may serve as a source and carrier to TCS, and its amendment can change TCS environmental behavior and further risk in soil.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorption; Desorption; Microplastics; Soil; Triclosan

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32822930     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  5 in total

Review 1.  Microplastic Pollution Focused on Sources, Distribution, Contaminant Interactions, Analytical Methods, and Wastewater Removal Strategies: A Review.

Authors:  Sílvia D Martinho; Virgínia Cruz Fernandes; Sónia A Figueiredo; Cristina Delerue-Matos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  Organic Contaminants and Interactions with Micro- and Nano-Plastics in the Aqueous Environment: Review of Analytical Methods.

Authors:  Julia Reichel; Johanna Graßmann; Oliver Knoop; Jörg E Drewes; Thomas Letzel
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Post COVID-19 pandemic: Disposable face masks as a potential vector of antibiotics in freshwater and seawater.

Authors:  Lujian Lin; Bo Yuan; Hualong Hong; Hanyi Li; Le He; Haoliang Lu; Jingchun Liu; Chongling Yan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 4.  Major contaminants of emerging concern in soils: a perspective on potential health risks.

Authors:  Naga Raju Maddela; Balasubramanian Ramakrishnan; Dhatri Kakarla; Kadiyala Venkateswarlu; Mallavarapu Megharaj
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Synergistic Adsorption of Organic Pollutants on Weathered Polyethylene Microplastics.

Authors:  Vaibhav Budhiraja; Anja Urh; Petra Horvat; Andrej Krzan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.967

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.