| Literature DB >> 32822832 |
N N Bennani1, I M Bennani-Baiti2.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32822832 PMCID: PMC7434419 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Oncol ISSN: 0923-7534 Impact factor: 32.976
Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes between prostate cancer patients undergoing (+ADT) or not (−ADT) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
| Outcome | +ADT | −ADT |
|---|---|---|
| Hospitalizations | 2 out of 4 ( | 76 out of 114 ( |
| Mild disease | 3 out of 4 ( | 83 out of 114 ( |
| Severe disease | 1 out of 4 ( | 31 out of 114 ( |
| Admission to ICU | 1 out of 4 ( | 13 out of 114 ( |
| Deaths | 0 out of 4 ( | 18 out of 114 ( |
The current thinking posits that under ADT, expression of TMPRSS2 (a co-factor for SARS-CoV-2 activation and virulence) would be reduced in the lungs, leading to less severe disease, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths. Data in this table from the Italian Veneto region contradict this widely accepted supposition: ADT imparts no major positive effects on hospitalization, disease severity, or ICU admissions.
ICU, intensive care unit.
A definitive analysis of mortality rates is rendered difficult owing to the very small size of the cohort of SARS-CoV-2-positive prostate cancer patients undergoing ADT (4 patients only). Nevertheless, if one were to assume that the fatality rates of the control group without ADT (∼16%) are similar to those of the ADT group, one would predict less than one death in the latter, a finding consistent with the lack of fatalities in this group.