| Literature DB >> 32821521 |
Tatsuo Nagata1, Yukinori Harada1, Mikki Arai2,3, Tatsuo Hirose3, Hiroyuki Kondo1.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based synthetic sealant for closing bleb leaks after glaucoma filtration surgery.Entities:
Keywords: FocalSeal; PEG sealant; hydrogel sealant; management of bleb leak; post-glaucoma surgery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32821521 PMCID: PMC7409081 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.6.24
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Figure 1.Photograph and sketch of the eye after the completion of the surgery. A fornix-based conjunctival flap is created in the left eye of the rabbit. Tube shunt surgery using a 22-gauge indwelling catheter with one suture and a partial-thickness scleral flap is performed in the sclera in the posterior upper limbus. The conjunctival incision is closed with six to eight end-to-end sutures.
Figure 2.(A, B) Diagram of the process for sealing bleb holes with the PEG sealant. PEG sealant was applied to the subconjunctival space under the hole. Then the hole was covered with the sealant. (C) The PEG sealant is polymerized by 60-second application of xenon light.
The Mean IOP (mm Hg) in Each Eye Group Before and 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 Days After the Tube Shunt Surgery
|
|
Figure 3.(A) Ultrasound biomicroscopy before bleb perforation. (B) Fourteen days after the PEG sealant is applied to the hole showing that the shape and function of the bleb are maintained after the PEG sealant is applied. (C) Fourteen days after perforation as control of B showing narrow anterior chamber and shriveled filtration bleb.
Figure 4.Histologic analysis. (A) HE staining shows that the hole is closed by conjunctival epithelial cells after the PEG sealant application. The arrow indicates the perforation sites. No evidence is seen of excessive inflammatory cells, foreign-body reaction, or toxic effects resulting from application of the PEG sealant. (B) The open hole in the control eye in which the sealant was not applied.
Figure 5.Histologic analysis. Arrows indicate the site of perforation. (A) Masson trichrome staining is very localized. A few fibroblasts and collagen fiber are stained blue in the eye in which the PEG sealant was applied. (B) The fibroblasts and collagen fibers seen extensively in the control group at the perforation site.
Figure 6.Histologic analysis, α-SMA immunostaining. (A) Few myofibroblasts in the eye in the area where the PEG sealant was applied (arrow). (B) Myofibroblasts developing in the control eye.