Elizabeth S Levin1, Jacob C Mandell2, Stacy E Smith2,3. 1. Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. elizsl.24@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 3. The Neil and Elise Wallace STRATUS Center for Medical Simulation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: While weight-bearing radiographs are considered the optimal method for evaluation of joint spaces in osteoarthritis, non-weight-bearing radiographs are often performed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of follow-up radiographs in patients receiving non-weight-bearing radiographs for chronic knee pain in the outpatient setting, compared with patients receiving weight-bearing radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who received non-weight-bearing knee radiographs for chronic knee pain between January 1, 2018, and June 15, 2019, were included. Exclusion criteria included trauma, concern for infection or tumor, and post-surgical radiographs. An age- and sex-matched control group of 100 patients who received weight-bearing knee radiographs was compiled. The proportion of follow-up radiographs within 1 year was compared between the study and control groups with chi-squared tests. RESULTS: Four hundred non-weight-bearing knee radiographic examinations were included. There were 74/400 (18.5%) follow-up radiographs within 12 months. All follow-up radiographs were weight-bearing. In the control group, 4/100 (4%) had follow-up weight-bearing radiographs within 1 year (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Outpatients who underwent non-weight-bearing knee radiographs for chronic pain had a higher frequency of repeat imaging than those who initially underwent weight-bearing knee radiographs. These results suggest that non-weight-bearing knee radiographs are of lower clinical utility compared with weight-bearing radiographs.
OBJECTIVE: While weight-bearing radiographs are considered the optimal method for evaluation of joint spaces in osteoarthritis, non-weight-bearing radiographs are often performed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of follow-up radiographs in patients receiving non-weight-bearing radiographs for chronic knee pain in the outpatient setting, compared with patients receiving weight-bearing radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who received non-weight-bearing knee radiographs for chronic knee pain between January 1, 2018, and June 15, 2019, were included. Exclusion criteria included trauma, concern for infection or tumor, and post-surgical radiographs. An age- and sex-matched control group of 100 patients who received weight-bearing knee radiographs was compiled. The proportion of follow-up radiographs within 1 year was compared between the study and control groups with chi-squared tests. RESULTS: Four hundred non-weight-bearing knee radiographic examinations were included. There were 74/400 (18.5%) follow-up radiographs within 12 months. All follow-up radiographs were weight-bearing. In the control group, 4/100 (4%) had follow-up weight-bearing radiographs within 1 year (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Outpatients who underwent non-weight-bearing knee radiographs for chronic pain had a higher frequency of repeat imaging than those who initially underwent weight-bearing knee radiographs. These results suggest that non-weight-bearing knee radiographs are of lower clinical utility compared with weight-bearing radiographs.
Authors: Susanna C Spence; Wade McAlister; Brian Reed; Mohammad Zare; Brigid Bingham; Jason Low; Marc Willis Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 5.532