| Literature DB >> 32820195 |
Isabela Ferreira Soares1, César López-Camacho2, Rodrigo Nunes Rodrigues-da-Silva3, Ada da Silva Matos1, Barbara de Oliveira Baptista4, Paulo Renato Rivas Totino4, Rodrigo Medeiros de Souza5, Kate Harrison2, Alba Marina Gimenez2, Elisângela Oliveira de Freitas2, Young Chan Kim2, Joseli Oliveira-Ferreira1, Cláudio Tadeu Daniel-Ribeiro4,6, Arturo Reyes-Sandoval2, Lilian Rose Pratt-Riccio4, Josué da Costa Lima-Junior7.
Abstract
Circumsporozoite protein (CSP) variants of P. vivax, besides having variations in the protein repetitive portion, can differ from each other in aspects such as geographical distribution, intensity of transmission, vectorial competence and immune response. Such aspects must be considered to P. vivax vaccine development. Therefore, we evaluated the immunogenicity of novel recombinant proteins corresponding to each of the three P. vivax allelic variants (VK210, VK247 and P. vivax-like) and of the C-terminal region (shared by all PvCSP variants) in naturally malaria-exposed populations of Brazilian Amazon. Our results demonstrated that PvCSP-VK210 was the major target of humoral immune response in studied population, presenting higher frequency and magnitude of IgG response. The IgG subclass profile showed a prevalence of cytophilic antibodies (IgG1 and IgG3), that seem to have an essential role in protective immune response. Differently of PvCSP allelic variants, antibodies elicited against C-terminal region of protein did not correlate with epidemiological parameters, bringing additional evidence that humoral response against this protein region is not essential to protective immunity. Taken together, these findings increase the knowledge on serological response to distinct PvCSP allelic variants and may contribute to the development of a global and effective P. vivax vaccine.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32820195 PMCID: PMC7441389 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70893-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Epidemiological features of the study population.
| Epidemiological features | CZSa | GJb | MLc | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 124) | (n = 87) | (n = 88) | (n = 299) | |
| Male | 65 (52.4%) | 45 (51.7%) | 44 (50%) | 154 (51.5%) |
| Female | 59 (47.6%) | 42 (48.3%) | 44 (50%) | 145 (48.5%) |
| A.P.I | 55,5 | 42,5 | 107,2 | 61,4 |
| Age (years) | 29.5 (20–45) | 33 (22–50) | 33.5 (23–42.5) | 32 (22–47) |
| Years of residence on endemic area | 29 (19.5–44) | 33.5 (23–50) | 32.5 (21–43) | 31 (21–47) |
| Years of residence in the present address | 20 (6–36) | 18 (3–29)c* | 27.5 (12.5–38.5)b* | 20 (5–36) |
| Months since the last malaria episode | 2.5 (0–60)b** | 12 (4–48)a**/c*** | 3.5 (0–22)b*** | 5 (0–36) |
| Number of malaria episodes on the last year | 1 (0–1) | 0 (0–1) | 1 (0–1.5) | 0.5 (0–1) |
| Number of previous malaria episodes | 6 (2–12) | 5 (2–10) | 10 (5–20) | 7 (3–15) |
| 23 (19%) | 16 (18%) | 17 (19%) | 56 (19%) | |
| 10 (8%) | 6 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 16 (5%) | |
| 68 (55%) | 51 (59%) | 67 (76%) | 186 (62%) | |
| Never infected | 1 (0.8%) | 6 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (2%) |
| Not reported | 21 (17%) | 8 (9%) | 5 (6%) | 34 (11%) |
| 39 (31.5%) | 10 (11.5%) | 24 (27.3%) | 73 (24.4%) | |
| 25 (20.2%) | 6 (6.9%) | 10 (11.4%) | 41 (13.7%) | |
| Mixed | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.1%) | 3 (3.4%) | 4 (1.3%) |
| Negative | 60 (48.4%)b** | 70 (80.5%)a**/c** | 51 (58%)b** | 181 (60.5%) |
Values of A.P.I. (annual parasitic index), Age, Years of residence in endemic areas, Years of residence in the present address, Months since the last malaria, Number of malaria episodes on the last year and number of previous malaria episodes represent the median (interquartile range). Frequencies were compared by Fisher’s test, and other epidemiological parameters were compared by Mann–Whitney test. Upper scripted letters (a,b,c) indicate the studied populations (CZS = Cruzeiro do Sul; ML = GJ = Guajará and Mâncio Lima, respectively) and statistical differences were represented by * (*)p < 0.05; (**)p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005.
Figure 1Expression of vCSP malarial antigens for protein production. (a) Schematic representation of the vivax CSP protein. The C-term portion (yellow) without its transmembrane domain, as well as the 3 different allelic variants from the central repeat region (VK217, VK247 and V-like) were fused to the c-tag epitope (EPEA) to allow purification using a c-tag affinity column (red). Black color represents the exogenous signal sequence contained in the expression plasmid construct. (b) Synthetic DNA sequences carrying such malarial antigens were extracted by double enzymatic digestion (AgeI and KpnI), red asterisk represents the specific size for each construct that were cut from the agarose gel, followed by ligation to the backbone plasmid pHLsec. (c) Enzymatic restriction from the PhLsec plasmids after ligation with the malarial antigens. Red asterisk represents the specific size of the coding regions and black asterisk represents the PhLSec backbone. PhLSec plasmid were transfected into HEK293 cells and supernatant was recovered 4 days after transfection. 10 ml of each of the supernatants was subjected to SDS-PAGE and western blot against the anti-C-Tag (d), the anti-210 (e), and the anti-247 (f) antibodies.
Figure 2Humoral response against PvCSP recombinant proteins. Frequencies of IgG responders in each studied locality (a); reactivity indexes of responders in the three studied localities (b); overall frequencies of IgG responders (c) and overall reactivity indexes of IgG antibodies of responders (d) to each recombinant protein derived from PvCSP. In (a) and (c), each bar represents the frequency of responders to one of the recombinant proteins (PvCSP-VK210: orange bar; PvCSP-VK247: green bar; PvCSP-P.vivax-like: gray bar and PvCSP-Ct: purple bar). Figure 1b,d, each point represents an individual RI against PvCSP recombinant proteins (PvCSP-VK210: orange points; PvCSP-VK247: green points; PvCSP-P.vivax-like: gray points and PvCSP-CT: purple points). Black bars on (b) and (d) represent values of median and interquartile range. RIs higher than 1 are considered responders to the recombinant protein. Frequencies of responders were compared by Fisher´s exact test and RIs were compared by Mann–Whitney test. Significant differences were indicated by *. (*) p < 0.05; (**) p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005.
Figure 3Venn diagram of responders to at least one of the recombinant proteins. In this diagram, values of N and the percentage of responders are demonstrated. Values marked with colors represent individuals that respond exclusively to the indicated protein (orange PvCSP-VK210, green PvCSP-VK247 and gray PvCSP-P. vivax-like). Values in black represent individuals that respond to two or three of the recombinant proteins according to the circles in which values are inserted.
Figure 4Frequency of IgG subclass responders (a) and their reactivity indexes (b) against the recombinant PvCSP proteins in the studied population. Points represent an individual RI against PvCSP recombinant proteins (PvCSP-VK210: orange points; PvCSP-VK247: green points; PvCSP-P. vivax-like: gray points and PvCSP-CT: purple points). The red traced line represents the cutoff, RIs higher than 1 are considered responders to the recombinant protein. Frequencies of responders were compared by Fisher´s exact test and RIs were compared by Mann–Whitney test. Significant differences among subclasses were indicated by * and significant differences among responsiveness to each protein were indicated by + ; (*) p < 0.05; (**) p < 0.01; (***; + + +) p < 0.001. In this figure # means that the subclass is different from all the others against the same protein.
Figure 5Comparison of epidemiological parameters between responders and non-responders to each PvCSP recombinant protein. TREA = Time of residence in endemic area (years), NPME = Number of previous malaria episodes, MSLM = Months since last malaria and TRPA = Time of residence in the present address (years). Epidemiological data of responders and non-responders to each one of the recombinant proteins were compared by Mann–Whitney test.
Figure 6Correlation of RIs of cytophilic IgG subclasses with months since the last malaria (MSLM). (a) Correlation of IgG1 RIs against PvCSP-VK210 with MSLM. (b) Correlation of IgG1 RIs against PvCSP-VK247 with MSLM. (c) Correlation of IgG1 RIs against PvCSP-P. vivax-like with MSLM. (d) Correlation of IgG3 RIs against PvCSP-P. vivax-like with MSLM.