Debra L Roter1, Steven E Gregorich2, Lisa Diamond3, Jennifer Livaudais-Toman2, Celia Kaplan2, Sarita Pathak2, Leah Karliner2. 1. Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. Electronic address: droter1@jhu.edu. 2. Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA. 3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore consequences of interpreter mediation of visit communication on patient centered dialogue and patient satisfaction with interpreter listening. METHODS: Fifty-five professionally interpreted primary care visits were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Two corresponding quantitative measures of patient-centered dialogue were calculated as ratios of psycho-emotional to biomedical statements based on (1) patient and clinician expressed codes and (2) interpreter conveyed codes. Multilevel models examined consequences of interpreter mediation on patient-centered dialogue and patient ratings of interpreter listening. RESULTS: Study participants included 27 Cantonese, 17 Mandarin and 11 Spanish-speaking primary care patients and 31 of their clinicians. Overall, clinicians expressed 2.26 times more statements and patients expressed 1.74 times more statements than interpreters conveyed. Interpreters conveyed significantly less patient-centered dialogue than expressed by patients and clinicians. All differences were evident within each study language. Interpreter conveyed patient centered dialogue positively predicted patient ratings of interpreter listening (B = 0.817; p < .007). CONCLUSIONS: The level of interpreter-conveyed patient-centered dialogue was both substantially lower than that expressed by patients and clinicians and a positive predictor of patient satisfaction with interpreter listening. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Fuller interpretation of patient-centered dialogue may enhance patient experience with interpreters and thereby increase care quality.
OBJECTIVES: To explore consequences of interpreter mediation of visit communication on patient centered dialogue and patient satisfaction with interpreter listening. METHODS: Fifty-five professionally interpreted primary care visits were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Two corresponding quantitative measures of patient-centered dialogue were calculated as ratios of psycho-emotional to biomedical statements based on (1) patient and clinician expressed codes and (2) interpreter conveyed codes. Multilevel models examined consequences of interpreter mediation on patient-centered dialogue and patient ratings of interpreter listening. RESULTS: Study participants included 27 Cantonese, 17 Mandarin and 11 Spanish-speaking primary care patients and 31 of their clinicians. Overall, clinicians expressed 2.26 times more statements and patients expressed 1.74 times more statements than interpreters conveyed. Interpreters conveyed significantly less patient-centered dialogue than expressed by patients and clinicians. All differences were evident within each study language. Interpreter conveyed patient centered dialogue positively predicted patient ratings of interpreter listening (B = 0.817; p < .007). CONCLUSIONS: The level of interpreter-conveyed patient-centered dialogue was both substantially lower than that expressed by patients and clinicians and a positive predictor of patient satisfaction with interpreter listening. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Fuller interpretation of patient-centered dialogue may enhance patient experience with interpreters and thereby increase care quality.
Authors: Maria E Garcia; Ladson Hinton; Steven E Gregorich; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Celia P Kaplan; Mitchell Feldman; Leah Karliner Journal: Health Equity Date: 2021-04-26