Literature DB >> 32819463

Survival and Right Ventricular Function After Surgical Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Joshua B Goldberg1, Daniel M Spevack2, Syed Ahsan2, Yogita Rochlani2, Tanya Dutta2, Suguru Ohira3, Masashi Kai3, David Spielvogel3, Steven Lansman3, Ramin Malekan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality because of right ventricular (RV) failure. There is evidence suggesting surgical therapy (surgical embolectomy or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]) is safe and effective.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of surgical management of acute PE.
METHODS: Surgical embolectomy and/or venoarterial ECMO were compared, between 2005 and 2019, for massive PE (MPE) versus high-risk submassive PE (SMPE). RV recovery was defined as improvements in central venous pressure, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, RV/left ventricular ratio, and RV fractional area change.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six patients with PE (92 with SMPE and 44 with MPE) were identified. Patients with MPE more often presented with syncope (59.1% [26 of 44] vs. 25.0% [23 of 92]; p = 0.0003), Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤4 (22.7% [10 of 44] vs. 0% [0 of 92]), and failed thrombolysis (18.2% [8 of 44] vs. 4.3% [3 of 92]; p = 0.008). Pre-operative cardiopulmonary resuscitation occurred in 43.2% of patients with MPE (19 of 44). Most patients with SMPE were treated with embolectomy (98.9% [91 of 92]), while ECMO was used more in those with MPE (ECMO in 40.9% [18 of 44], embolectomy in 59.1% [26 of 44]). RV function improved as measured by central venous pressure (from 23.4 ± 4.9 to 10.5 ± 3.1 mm Hg), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (from 60.6 ± 14.2 to 33.8 ± 10.7 mm Hg), RV/left ventricular ratio (from 1.19 ± 0.33 to 0.87 ± 0.23; p < 0.005), and fractional area change (from 26.8 to 41.0; p < 0.005). Mortality was 4.4% (6 of 136; SMPE, 1.1% [1 of 92]; MPE, 11.6% [5 of 44]). Subgroup analysis showed morbidity and mortality were highly associated with pre-operative cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of patients with MPE and high-risk SMPE is safe and highly effective at achieving RV recovery.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPR; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; outcomes; pulmonary embolism; right ventricular failure

Year:  2020        PMID: 32819463     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  3 in total

1.  Management of Massive Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Eva Polaková; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2022-09-23

Review 2.  Contemporary Catheter-Based Treatment Options for Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Maninder Singh; Irfan Shafi; Parth Rali; Joseph Panaro; Vladimir Lakhter; Riyaz Bashir
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-12

Review 3.  Management of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: What Is the Place of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?

Authors:  Benjamin Assouline; Marie Assouline-Reinmann; Raphaël Giraud; David Levy; Ouriel Saura; Karim Bendjelid; Alain Combes; Matthieu Schmidt
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.