Literature DB >> 32819146

Does the Symmetry of Patellar Morphology Matter When Matching Osteochondral Allografts for Osteochondral Defects Involving the Central Ridge of the Patella?

Karan Patel1, Nabeel S Salka2, Austin Ramme3, Jaron C Scott4, John A Grant5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if differences in Wiberg classification play a role in the ability of donor patellar osteochondral allografts to match the native patellar surface when treating osteochondral defects of the patellar apex.
DESIGN: Twenty (10 Wiberg I and 10 Wiberg II/III) human patellae were designated as the recipient. Each recipient was size-matched to both a Wiberg I and a Wiberg II/III patellar donor. A 16-mm circular osteochondral "defect" was created on the central ridge of the recipient patella. The randomly ordered donor Wiberg I or Wiberg II/III plug was harvested from a homologous location and transplanted into the recipient. The recipient was then nano-CT (computed tomography) scanned, digitally reconstructed, registered to the initial nano-CT scan of the recipient patella, and processed to determine root mean squared circumferential step-off heights as well as surface height deviation. The process was then repeated for the other allograft plug.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean step-off height between matched and unmatched Wiberg plugs; however, there was a statistically significant difference in surface height deviation over the whole surface (0.50 mm and 0.64 mm respectively, P = 0.03). This difference of 0.14 mm is not felt to be clinically significant. Tibial width was correlated to patellar width (r = 0.82) and patellar height (r = 0.68).
CONCLUSIONS: For osteochondral allograft sizes up to 16 mm there appears to be no advantage to match donor and recipient patellar morphology. Further study is warranted to evaluate defects requiring larger graft sizes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cartilage; osteochondral allograft; patella

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32819146      PMCID: PMC8804836          DOI: 10.1177/1947603520951624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   3.117


  35 in total

1.  Topographic Analysis of the Distal Femoral Condyle Articular Cartilage Surface: Adequacy of the Graft from Opposite Condyles of the Same or Different Size for the Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation.

Authors:  Adam B Yanke; Atsushi Urita; Jason J Shin; Greg L Cvetanovich; Erin K Moran; Bernard R Bach; Brian J Cole; Nozomu Inoue; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Operative treatment of osteochondritis dissecans in situ by retrograde drilling and cancellous bone graft: a preliminary report.

Authors:  C K Lee; C Mercurio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation in study of the treatment of articular repair (STAR) patients with osteochondritis dissecans.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; Thomas DeBerardino; Robert Brewster; Jack Farr; David W Levine; Carl Nissen; Prudence Roaf; Kenneth Zaslav
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The results of operative treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the patella.

Authors:  C Schwarz; M E Blazina; D J Sisto; L C Hirsh
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Osteochondral allograft transplant to the medial femoral condyle using a medial or lateral femoral condyle allograft: is there a difference in graft sources?

Authors:  Timothy S Mologne; Esther Cory; Bradley C Hansen; Angela N Naso; Neil Chang; Michael M Murphy; Matthew T Provencher; William D Bugbee; Robert L Sah
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Outcomes following impaction bone grafting for treatment of unstable osteochondritis dissecans.

Authors:  Robert A Gallo; Michael Plakke; Timothy Mosher; Kevin P Black
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The evaluation and management of cartilage lesions affecting the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Eric J Strauss; David K Galos
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

8.  Functional and radiographic outcomes of unstable juvenile osteochondritis dissecans of the knee treated with lesion fixation using bioabsorbable pins.

Authors:  Nobuo Adachi; Masataka Deie; Atsuo Nakamae; Atsushi Okuhara; Goki Kamei; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Relationship between Anatomical Risk Factors, Articular Cartilage Lesions, and Patient Outcomes Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Charles L Holliday; Laurie A Hiemstra; Sarah Kerslake; John A Grant
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Osteochondral grafting: effect of graft alignment, material properties, and articular geometry.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Peter C Chen; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2009-08-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Osteochondral Allograft Transplant of the Patella Using Femoral Condylar Allografts: Letter to the Editor.

Authors:  Adam B Yanke; Hailey P Huddleston; Blake M Bodendorfer
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.