Literature DB >> 32818387

Reward Enhances Pain Discrimination in Humans.

Susanne Becker1,2, Martin Löffler1, Ben Seymour3,4,5.   

Abstract

The notion that reward inhibits pain is a well-supported observation in both humans and animals, allowing suppression of pain reflexes to acquired rewarding stimuli. However, a blanket inhibition of pain by reward would also impair pain discrimination. In contrast, early counterconditioning experiments implied that reward might actually spare pain discrimination. To test this hypothesis, we investigated whether discriminative performance was enhanced or inhibited by reward. We found in adult human volunteers (N = 25) that pain-based discriminative ability is actually enhanced by reward, especially when reward is directly contingent on discriminative performance. Drift-diffusion modeling shows that this relates to an augmentation of the underlying sensory signal strength and is not merely an effect of decision bias. This enhancement of sensory-discriminative pain-information processing suggests that whereas reward can promote reward-acquiring behavior by inhibition of pain in some circumstances, it can also facilitate important discriminative information of the sensory input when necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  discrimination; drift-diffusion model; pain perception; response bias; reward; sensory strength

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32818387      PMCID: PMC7513004          DOI: 10.1177/0956797620939588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  16 in total

Review 1.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Hauke R Heekeren; Sean Marrett; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times.

Authors:  Joachim Vandekerckhove; Francis Tuerlinckx; Michael D Lee
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-03

4.  Quantifying explained variance in multilevel models: An integrative framework for defining R-squared measures.

Authors:  Jason D Rights; Sonya K Sterba
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2018-07-12

Review 5.  Understanding opioid reward.

Authors:  Howard L Fields; Elyssa B Margolis
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 6.  Descending control of nociception: Specificity, recruitment and plasticity.

Authors:  M M Heinricher; I Tavares; J L Leith; B M Lumb
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2008-12-25

7.  Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble and recruit win-related brain circuitry.

Authors:  Luke Clark; Andrew J Lawrence; Frances Astley-Jones; Nicola Gray
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  A common neurobiology for pain and pleasure.

Authors:  Siri Leknes; Irene Tracey
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Orbitofrontal cortex mediates pain inhibition by monetary reward.

Authors:  Susanne Becker; Wiebke Gandhi; Florence Pomares; Tor D Wager; Petra Schweinhardt
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python.

Authors:  Thomas V Wiecki; Imri Sofer; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.