BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Evaluating the time taken at each step in a patient office visit is important for physicians and clinical staff for clinic workflow improvements. Very little data exists on efficiency that is not self-reported by physicians. Employees often have perceptions of the efficiency of a clinic without supporting data. This study examined whether employee perceptions of the amount of patient time spent at various points in the visit matched observed times. METHODS: Observational cohort study methods and a cross-sectional survey were used in the fall of 2017 in a family practice residency outpatient clinic. Clinical staff (physicians and support staff) were surveyed for their perceptions of patients' time spent at each checkpoint in an office visit. A total of 885 visits were recorded, with 705 being included after review. Time spent at various steps, appointment type, and clinician years of experience were assessed with t-test for statistical significance. RESULTS: The anonymous clinic survey had a 75.5% response rate (37/49) and showed "rooming patients" and "waiting in the exam room to be seen" were the two areas that took longer than expected. The observed data confirmed this perception, showing that rooming and waiting in the exam room each took longer than the staff expected. These values were also greater than available national average times. There was a significant correlation between physician training year and visit length. There was no correlation for nursing experience and patient visit times. CONCLUSIONS: The staff-perceived inefficiencies correlated with observed inefficiencies. Addressing these problems would improve patient care and overall clinic workflow.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Evaluating the time taken at each step in a patient office visit is important for physicians and clinical staff for clinic workflow improvements. Very little data exists on efficiency that is not self-reported by physicians. Employees often have perceptions of the efficiency of a clinic without supporting data. This study examined whether employee perceptions of the amount of patient time spent at various points in the visit matched observed times. METHODS: Observational cohort study methods and a cross-sectional survey were used in the fall of 2017 in a family practice residency outpatient clinic. Clinical staff (physicians and support staff) were surveyed for their perceptions of patients' time spent at each checkpoint in an office visit. A total of 885 visits were recorded, with 705 being included after review. Time spent at various steps, appointment type, and clinician years of experience were assessed with t-test for statistical significance. RESULTS: The anonymous clinic survey had a 75.5% response rate (37/49) and showed "rooming patients" and "waiting in the exam room to be seen" were the two areas that took longer than expected. The observed data confirmed this perception, showing that rooming and waiting in the exam room each took longer than the staff expected. These values were also greater than available national average times. There was a significant correlation between physician training year and visit length. There was no correlation for nursing experience and patient visit times. CONCLUSIONS: The staff-perceived inefficiencies correlated with observed inefficiencies. Addressing these problems would improve patient care and overall clinic workflow.
Authors: Stefan Priebe; Walid K H Fakhoury; Karin Hoffmann; Richard A Powell Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Diane Lorenzetti; Sharon E Straus; Lindsay Sykes; Hude Quan Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Mark Linzer; Sara Poplau; Ellie Grossman; Anita Varkey; Steven Yale; Eric Williams; Lanis Hicks; Roger L Brown; Jill Wallock; Diane Kohnhorst; Michael Barbouche Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 5.128