Karen Willoughby1, Charo Rodríguez2, Miriam Boillat3, Marion Dove4, Peter Nugus3, Yvonne Steinert5, Leonora Lalla4. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, Canada. 2. McGill University Department of Family Medicine. 3. Department of Family Medicine and Center for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Canada. 4. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Canada. 5. Center for Medical Education and Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite the increasing popularity of longitudinal primary care experiences in North America and beyond, there is a paucity of work assessing these medical undergraduate experiences using reliable and valid questionnaires. Our objective in this study was to evaluate a new preclerkship longitudinal family medicine experience (LFME) course at McGill University by assessing family physician preceptors' self-reported ratings of the perceived effects of this course, and to compare their responses with ratings provided by medical students who completed the course. METHODS: This study is part of a larger evaluative research project assessing the first edition of the LFME. Students (N=187) and preceptors (N=173) of the 2013-2014 cohort were invited to complete separate online questionnaires in the spring through summer of 2014. The preceptor survey contained 53 items, 14 of which were nearly identical to items in the student survey (published elsewhere) and served as the basis for comparing preceptor and student ratings of the LFME. RESULTS: Ninety-nine preceptors (57% response rate; 55% female) and 120 students (64% response rate; 58% female) completed the surveys. Preceptors and students did not significantly differ in their overall ratings of the course, as both groups were satisfied with the quality of the LFME and felt it was an appropriate and valuable educational experience. However, preceptors had more positive ratings regarding their role and the benefits of the course than did medical students. CONCLUSION: This study corroborates prior work showing extensive perceived benefits of longitudinal preclerkship exposure to primary care; however, preceptors were found to report more positive reviews of the course than students. This study also provides new innovative tools to assess students' and preceptors' perceptions of longitudinal, preclerkship family medicine courses available for use over time and in different educational contexts.
INTRODUCTION: Despite the increasing popularity of longitudinal primary care experiences in North America and beyond, there is a paucity of work assessing these medical undergraduate experiences using reliable and valid questionnaires. Our objective in this study was to evaluate a new preclerkship longitudinal family medicine experience (LFME) course at McGill University by assessing family physician preceptors' self-reported ratings of the perceived effects of this course, and to compare their responses with ratings provided by medical students who completed the course. METHODS: This study is part of a larger evaluative research project assessing the first edition of the LFME. Students (N=187) and preceptors (N=173) of the 2013-2014 cohort were invited to complete separate online questionnaires in the spring through summer of 2014. The preceptor survey contained 53 items, 14 of which were nearly identical to items in the student survey (published elsewhere) and served as the basis for comparing preceptor and student ratings of the LFME. RESULTS: Ninety-nine preceptors (57% response rate; 55% female) and 120 students (64% response rate; 58% female) completed the surveys. Preceptors and students did not significantly differ in their overall ratings of the course, as both groups were satisfied with the quality of the LFME and felt it was an appropriate and valuable educational experience. However, preceptors had more positive ratings regarding their role and the benefits of the course than did medical students. CONCLUSION: This study corroborates prior work showing extensive perceived benefits of longitudinal preclerkship exposure to primary care; however, preceptors were found to report more positive reviews of the course than students. This study also provides new innovative tools to assess students' and preceptors' perceptions of longitudinal, preclerkship family medicine courses available for use over time and in different educational contexts.
Authors: D H Fernald; A C Staudenmaier; C J Tressler; D S Main; A O'Brien-Gonzales; G E Barley Journal: Teach Learn Med Date: 2001 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: Karen A Willoughby; Charo Rodríguez; Miriam Boillat; Marion Dove; Peter Nugus; Yvonne Steinert; Leonora Lalla Journal: Educ Prim Care Date: 2016-04-28
Authors: David Hirsh; Elizabeth Gaufberg; Barbara Ogur; Pieter Cohen; Edward Krupat; Malcolm Cox; Stephen Pelletier; David Bor Journal: Acad Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Otto Pichlhöfer; Hans Tönies; Wolfgang Spiegel; Andree Wilhelm-Mitteräcker; Manfred Maier Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 2.463