| Literature DB >> 32818111 |
Jie Zhang1, Daryl Crimmins2, James M Faed2, Peter Flanagan2, Charles N J McGhee1, Dipika V Patel1.
Abstract
Purpose: Platelet lysate produced from platelet apheresis components has been proposed as an alternative to serum eye drops in the treatment of ocular surface disease. This study compared the effects of platelet lysate and serum on growth factor, cytokine and nanoparticle concentrations, and corneal epithelial cell proliferation.Entities:
Keywords: cornea; epithelium; growth factors; platelet lysate; serum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32818111 PMCID: PMC7396199 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.4.24
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Characteristics of Serum Eye Drops and Platelet Lysates
| Trima (70% PAS-E:30% Plasma) | Haemonetics LDP (100% Plasma) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth Factor and Nanoparticles | Serum Autologous | Serum Allogeneic | D2 (Fresh) | D8 (Expired) | D2 (Fresh) | D8 (Expired) |
|
| EGF (pg/mL) | 656.3 ± 175.8 | 884.3 ± 303.6 | 1531 ± 334.3 | 2373 ± 1017 | 1206 ± 259 | 2451 ± 370.5 | <0.0001 |
| PDGF-AB (pg/mL) | 12,432 ± 6398 | 11,236 ± 3207 | 22,404 ± 5518 | 17,532 ± 5868 | 25,590 ± 11,072 | 26,403 ± 6540 | 0.0028 |
| PDGF-BB (pg/mL) | 2814 ± 610.8 | 2880 ± 1188 | 5209 ± 1147 | 5719 ± 1599 | 5819 ± 1141 | 10,809 ± 1702 | <0.0001 |
| bFGF (pg/mL) | 7.79 ± 5.233 | 4.911 ± 4.024 | 164.9 ± 62.06 | 126.2 ± 53.94 | 92.58 ± 58.61 | 65.35 ± 48.03 | <0.0001 |
| TGF-β1 (pg/mL) | 27,802 ± 6538 | 32,719 ± 13,980 | 49,280 ± 7186 | 169,271 ± 51,345 | 129,626 ± 73,952 | 158,932 ± 63,517 | <0.0001 |
| IGF-1 (ng/mL) | 55.01 ± 41.92 | 71.52 ± 31.71 | 23.68 ± 3.33 | 24.7 ± 11.87 | 70.23 ± 25.58 | 55.16 ± 7.66 | 0.0036 |
| Fibronectin (ng/mL) | 261,147 ± 80,868 | 211,908 ± 45,066 | 24,498 ± 40,468 | 14,468 ± 8028 | 88,150 ± 61,267 | 193,703 ± 145,800 | <0.0001 |
| HGF (pg/mL) | 1003 ± 198.3 | 922.5 ± 215.4 | 492.8 ± 225.9 | 623.2 ± 240.1 | 533.5 ± 131 | 738.9 ± 83.65 | 0.0002 |
| VEGF (pg/mL) | 254.5 ± 115.8 | 304.3 ± 202.1 | 269.2 ± 140 | 404.4 ± 167 | 303.6 ± 228.2 | 304.4 ± 119.2 | 0.7095 |
| ThromboLUX nanoparticle radius (nm) | 138 ± 31.06 | 186.3 ± 31.87 | 129 ± 39.94 | 199.3 ± 111.2 | 207.2 ± 50.78 | 186.7 ± 44.58 | 0.1262 |
| ThromboLUX nanoparticles × 1012/L | 3.217 ± 3.998 | 2.317 ± 2.156 | 0.65 ± 0.1871 | 0.8333 ± 0.8017 | 1.8 ± 1.293 | 2.15 ± 1.522 | 0.2811 |
Values shown as mean ± SD; n = 6 for all groups.
Obtained using one-way ANOVA indicating an overall difference between the serum eye drops and platelet lysate formulations.
P < 0.05 between serum autologous eye drops and platelet lysate, determined using one-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak multiple comparison test.
P < 0.05 between serum allogeneic eye drops and platelet lysate, determined using one-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak multiple comparison test.
Figure 1.Proliferation of corneal epithelial cells supplemented with 10% of serum, platelet lysate, or fetal calf serum. There was no significant difference between groups (one-way ANOVA, P = 0.363). n = 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 2.
Figure 2.Representative images showing migration of corneal epithelial cells to close a scratch wound, taken at different time points. The area of the wound at each time point is outlined. The dots were permanent marker pen marks on the outside of the wells to ensure the same location was imaged. Scale bar = 1000 µm. Serum Auto, serum autologous; Serum Allo, serum allogeneic; Trima D2, Trima day 2 (fresh) platelet lysate; Trima D8, Trima day 8 (expired) platelet lysate; Haemo D8, Haemonetics day 8 (expired) platelet lysate; FCS, fetal calf serum.
Figure 3.The speed with which corneal epithelial cells migrated to close a scratch wound in culture medium supplemented with 10% of serum, platelet lysates, and fetal calf serum. One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference between groups at 0 to 6 hours. Tukey's comparison showed significant differences between serum autologous and fetal calf serum (*) and between serum allogeneic and fetal calf serum. There was no significant difference in other pairwise comparisons at 0 to 6 hours. There was no significant difference between groups in corneal epithelial cell wound-healing speed by one-way ANOVA at 6 to 12 hours and at 12 to 24 hours.