| Literature DB >> 32817377 |
Franziska Gerwien1, Christine Dunker2, Philipp Brandt1, Enrico Garbe1, Ilse D Jacobsen2, Slavena Vylkova3.
Abstract
Typically, established lab strains are widely used to study host-pathogen interactions. However, to better reflect the infection process, the experimental use of clinical isolates has come more into focus. Here, we analyzed the interaction of multiple vaginal isolates of the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans, the most common cause of vulvovaginal candidiasis in women, with key players of the host immune system: macrophages. We tested several strains isolated from asymptomatic or symptomatic women with acute and recurrent infections. While all clinical strains showed a response similar to the commonly used lab strain SC5314 in various in vitro assays, they displayed remarkable differences during interaction with macrophages. This coincided with significantly reduced β-glucan exposure on the cell surface, which appeared to be a shared property among the tested vaginal strains for yeast extract/peptone/dextrose-grown cells, which is partly lost when the isolates faced vaginal niche-like nutrient conditions. However, macrophage damage, survival of phagocytosis, and filamentation capacities were highly strain-specific. These results highlight the high heterogeneity of C. albicans strains in host-pathogen interactions, which have to be taken into account to bridge the gap between laboratory-gained data and disease-related outcomes in an actual patient.IMPORTANCE Vulvovaginal candidiasis is one of the most common fungal infections in humans with Candida albicans as the major causative agent. This study is the first to compare clinical vaginal isolates of defined patient groups in their interaction with macrophages, highlighting the vastly different outcomes in comparison to a laboratory strain using commonly applied virulence-determining assays.Entities:
Keywords: Candida albicanszzm321990; cell wall; macrophages; vulvovaginal candidiasis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32817377 PMCID: PMC7407065 DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00393-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSphere ISSN: 2379-5042 Impact factor: 4.389
FIG 1J774.1 macrophage interaction with C. albicans vaginal isolates. Color coding indicates Isolate type. (A) Macrophage killing (measured via LDH release) following infection with the selected strains. Damage is displayed as the percentage of Triton-X-treated high control (100% macrophage lysis) at 24 h postinfection. Uninfected macrophage control results were subtracted beforehand. Five biological replicates in technical triplicates were conducted. The degree of hyphal formation (DMEM with macrophages, 24 h, 37°C) is indicated by the pattern of the bar: +++, SC5314-like hypha length with branching; ++, moderate hyphae length with marginal branching; +, short hyphae; −, no hyphae or sporadic germ tubes. (B) Fungal killing was assessed for SC5314 and all tested isolates after 24 h by calculating the ratio of Candida microcolonies using the following formula: (colonies in the presence of macrophages/colonies in DMEM) × 100. Three biological replicates were conducted. The degree of hyphal formation (DMEM with macrophages, 24 h, 37°C) is indicated by pattern of the bar: +++, SC5314-like hypha length with branching; ++, moderate hyphae length with marginal branching; +, short hyphae; –, no hyphae or sporadic germ tubes. (C) Intraphagosomal filamentation was assessed for SC5314, JS14, and JS16 by measuring the hyphal lengths of 100 phagocytosed yeasts at 1 h postinfection by fluorescence microscopy and differential staining (phagocytosed Candida cells: ConA negative and CFW positive). The presented data are from three biological replicates. (D) Recognition by macrophages was assessed 30 min postinfection for SC5314, JS14, or JS16 strains and presented as the percentage of macrophages nonassociated with fungal cells (w/o Ca), with attached fungal cells (w/attached Ca), or with ingested fungal cells (w/ingested Ca). Heat-killed Candida cells (HK Ctrl) were included as control with known diminished recognition due to induced cell wall aberrations. Three biological replicates were conducted. For statistical analysis, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; #, P < 0.0001 [compared to SC5314]).
FIG 2Cell wall architecture of SC5314 and C. albicans vaginal isolates. The levels of chitin, mannan, and β-glucan were measured as the x-fold increase of median fluorescence intensity (MFI) over an unstained control via differential staining and flow cytometry. Values are shown as means ± the standard deviations (n = 3). For statistical analysis, a one-way ANOVA was performed, followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; #, P < 0.0001 [compared to SC5314]). (A) Fungal cells were grown as an ON culture in YPD. A sublethal concentration of caspofungin (CAS; 0.625 ng/ml = 1/4 MIC50) was added to SC5314 as a positive control for β-glucan exposure. (B) Fungal cells were grown for 2 days in VSM.