Literature DB >> 32817345

Follow-up outcomes of intracranial aneurysms treated using braided or laser-cut stents with closed-cell design: a propensity score-matched case-controlled comparison.

JeongWook Lim1, Young Dae Cho2, Noah Hong3, Jeongjun Lee4, Dong Hyun Yoo5, Hyun-Seung Kang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of various stents on patients with intracranial aneurysms who undergo stent-assisted coiling has been debated. We conducted this study to compare follow-up outcomes of coiling procedures involving braided or laser-cut stents with closed-cell design. A propensity score-matched case-controlled analysis was applied.
METHODS: A total of 413 intracranial aneurysms consecutively coiled using laser-cut (n=245) or braided stents (n=168) in procedures performed between September 2012 and June 2017 were eligible for study. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, catheter angiography, or both were used to gauge occlusive status after coiling. Recanalization was determined by Raymond classification (complete occlusion vs recanalization). A propensity score-matched analysis was conducted, based on probability of stent type in use.
RESULTS: Ultimately, 93 coiled aneurysms (22.5%) showed some recanalization (minor, 51; major, 42) during the follow-up period (mean 21.7±14.5 months). Patient gender (P=0.042), hyperlipidemia (P=0.015), size of aneurysm (P=0.004), neck size (P<0.001), type of aneurysm (P<0.001), and packing density (P=0.024) differed significantly by group. Midterm and cumulative recanalization incidence rates in the braided-stent group were initially lower than those of the laser-cut stent group (P=0.009 and P=0.037, respectively) but they did not differ significantly after 1:1 propensity score matching (midterm OR=0.88, P=0.724; cumulative HR=0.91, P=0.758).
CONCLUSION: In stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms, laser-cut and braided stent groups produced similar outcomes in follow-up. Consequently, product selection may hinge on suitability for deployment rather than anticipated results. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneurysm; coil; stent

Year:  2020        PMID: 32817345     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  2 in total

1.  Y-stent assisted coiling of ruptured wide neck intracranial aneurysm in the acute phase.

Authors:  İsmail Okan Yıldırım; Mehmet Kolu; Mehmet Akif Durak; Bora Tetik; Ramazan Paşahan; Şükrü Gürbüz; Kaya Saraç
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 1.764

2.  Is a small coil more effective as a finishing coil for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms? Outcomes using GALAXY G3™ MINI micro-coils as finishing coils in a single center.

Authors:  Sang-Uk Kim; Joon Huh; Hyun-Goo Lee; Won-Joo Jeong; Dal-Soo Kim; Choon-Woong Huh; Han-Zo Choi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.610

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.