Literature DB >> 32816897

Quality improvement initiative for improved patient communication in an ED rapid assessment zone.

Ahmed Taher1,2, Federico Webster Magcalas2, Victoria Woolner2,3,4, Stephen Casey2, Debra Davies2, Lucas B Chartier5,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient-clinician communication in the Emergency Department (ED) faces challenges of time and interruptions, resulting in negative effects on patient satisfaction with communication and failure to relieve anxiety. Our aim was to improve patient satisfaction with communication and to decrease related patient anxiety.
METHODS: A multistage quality improvement (QI) initiative was conducted in the ED of Toronto General Hospital, a quaternary care centre in Ontario, Canada, from January to May 2018. We engaged stakeholders widely including clinicians, allied health and patients. We developed a 5-point Likert scale survey to measure patient and clinician rating of their communication experience, along with open-ended questions, and a patient focus group. Inductive analyses yielded interventions that were introduced through three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles: (1) a clinician communication tool called Acknowledge-Empathize-Inform; (2) patient information pamphlets; and (3) a multimedia solution displaying patient-directed material. Our primary outcome was to improve patient satisfaction with communication and decrease anxiety by at least one Likert scale point over 6 months. Our secondary outcome was clinician-perceived interruptions by patients. We used statistical process control (SPC) charts to identify special cause variation and two-tailed Mann-Whitney U tests to compare means (statistical significance p<0.05).
RESULTS: A total of 232 patients and 104 clinicians were surveyed over baseline and three PDSA cycles. Communication about wait times, ED process, timing of next steps and directions to patient areas were the most frequently identified gaps, which informed our interventions. Measurements at baseline and during PDSA 3 showed: patient satisfaction increased from 3.28 (5 being best; n=65) to 4.15 (n=59, p<0.0001). Patient anxiety decreased from 2.96 (1 being best; n=65) to 2.31 (n=59, p<0.001). Clinician-perceived interruptions by patients changed from 4.33 (5 being highest; n=30) to 4.18 (n=11, p=0.98) and did not meet significance. SPC charts showed special cause variation temporally associated with our interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our pragmatic low-cost QI initiative led to statistically significant improvement in patient satisfaction with communication and decreased patient anxiety while narrowly missing our a priori improvement aim of one full Likert scale point. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emergency department; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32816897     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction, needs, and preferences concerning information dispensation at the emergency department: a cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Marank de Steenwinkel; Juanita A Haagsma; Esther C M van Berkel; Lotte Rozema; Pleunie P M Rood; Marna G Bouwhuis
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-24

2.  'I knew I'd be taken care of': Exploring patient experiences in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Sharon Latimer; Julia Crilly; David Spain; Brigid M Gillespie
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 3.057

3.  A blueprint for building an emergency department quality improvement and patient safety committee.

Authors:  Lucas B Chartier; Sameer Masood; Joseph Choi; Barb McGovern; Stephen Casey; Steven Marc Friedman; Danielle Porplycia; Sarah Tosoni; Sam Sabbah
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.929

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.