Literature DB >> 32816606

Ctcf haploinsufficiency mediates intron retention in a tissue-specific manner.

Adel B Alharbi1,2,3,4, Ulf Schmitz1,2,3, Amy D Marshall1, Darya Vanichkina1,3,5, Rajini Nagarajah1, Melissa Vellozzi1,2, Justin Jl Wong3,6, Charles G Bailey1,3, John Ej Rasko1,3,7.   

Abstract

CTCF is a master regulator of gene transcription and chromatin organisation with occupancy at thousands of DNA target sites genome-wide. While CTCF is essential for cell survival, CTCF haploinsufficiency is associated with tumour development and hypermethylation. Increasing evidence demonstrates CTCF as a key player in several mechanisms regulating alternative splicing (AS), however, the genome-wide impact of Ctcf dosage on AS has not been investigated. We examined the effect of Ctcf haploinsufficiency on gene expression and AS in five tissues from Ctcf hemizygous (Ctcf +/-) mice. Reduced Ctcf levels caused distinct tissue-specific differences in gene expression and AS in all tissues. An increase in intron retention (IR) was observed in Ctcf +/- liver and kidney. In liver, this specifically impacted genes associated with cytoskeletal organisation, splicing and metabolism. Strikingly, most differentially retained introns were short, with a high GC content and enriched in Ctcf binding sites in their proximal upstream genomic region. This study provides new insights into the effects of CTCF haploinsufficiency on organ transcriptomes and the role of CTCF in AS regulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative splicing; CTCF; exon skipping; gene expression; haploinsufficiency; intron retention

Year:  2020        PMID: 32816606      PMCID: PMC7834090          DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1796052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA Biol        ISSN: 1547-6286            Impact factor:   4.652


Introduction

CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is a highly conserved, multivalent, 11-zinc finger DNA-and RNA-binding protein, which occupies thousands of conserved target sites distributed across vertebrate genomes and co-ordinates topologically associating domain (TAD) formation [1-5]. Numerous studies have shown that CTCF regulates diverse biological functions including transcriptional activation and repression, insulation, high-order chromatin organisation, X-chromosome inactivation, pre-mRNA splicing, and DNA methylation [6,7]. CTCF binding occurs in a tissue-specific manner, and the binding sites themselves are highly conserved among different species [2-5,8,9]. Over 30% and 50% of all CTCF binding sites are located in intronic and intergenic regions, respectively [2,5,9]. The ubiquitously expressed transcription factor CTCF exhibits differential expression in mammalian tissues [8,10,11], which require specific CTCF levels for growth, differentiation and development [12-14]. Homozygous deletion of Ctcf causes early embryonic lethality in mice [15], while mice harbouring a hemizygous deletion of Ctcf (Ctcf+/-) exhibit delayed post-natal growth and development [15,16]. Sustained Ctcf haploinsufficiency in mice has various pathophysiological implications including spontaneous widespread tumour formation in diverse tissues as well as genome-wide aberrant hypermethylation [17]. Consistent with that, we have shown that CTCF acts as a haploinsufficient tumour suppressor [16,18,19]. Nevertheless, the underlying link between Ctcf haploinsufficiency and spontaneous tumour formation remains to be fully elucidated. Compelling evidence has linked CTCF to alternative splicing (AS) regulation due to its direct or indirect role in modulating splicing decisions via complex mechanisms including RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) elongation, transcriptional regulation of splicing factors, DNA methylation and chromatin organisation [20-25]. Despite its potential importance, the impact of altered CTCF dosage on AS has not been investigated at a global scale. More than 90% of human multi-exonic genes undergo AS in a tissue-specific manner [26,27]. While normal AS contributes to transcriptome and proteome diversity, aberrant AS can have deleterious effects leading to the development of several pathological complications including cancer [28-30]. Therefore, identifying potential modulators of AS is critical to fully comprehend the aetiology and molecular pathophysiology of cancer. In this study, we conducted transcriptomic analyses in Ctcf+/- mice to explore the impact of Ctcf haploinsufficiency in AS regulation in brain, kidney, liver, muscle, and spleen. We found that Ctcf haploinsufficiency induces changes to gene expression and AS that are strikingly tissue-specific. Intron retention (IR), for example, is highly upregulated in Ctcf haploinsufficient liver and kidney compared to wildtype (WT) mice. Differential IR could be mediated by Ctcf binding sites located up- and downstream of retained introns.

Results

Ctcf mediates tissue-specific gene expression and alternative splicing

Transcriptomic and proteomic studies have revealed that CTCF is expressed in all mammalian tissues at levels that vary by up to 20-fold [10,11]. To assess the dosage-dependent impact of CTCF on gene regulation and AS, we examined a Ctcf haploinsufficient mouse model harbouring a hemizygous deletion of Ctcf. In this model, the entire coding region of one Ctcf allele is replaced with an expression cassette containing the pgk promoter and neomycin gene (Ctcf+/pgkneo, herein referred to as Ctcf+/- for simplicity) (Fig. 1A, Supplementary Fig. 1). We selected five tissues from different body systems for which the relative CTCF expression between tissues is consistent for human and mouse (Supplementary Fig. 2), including lymphatic (spleen), nervous (brain), urinary (kidney), muscular (quadriceps femoris) and digestive (liver) systems. We isolated all five tissues from 11-week-old female mice comprising Ctcf+/- and WT littermates, and validated the reduction of Ctcf mRNA (by 36–41%) and Ctcf protein (the 130 kDa species by 18–59%) expression in Ctcf+/- mice by RT-qPCR and Western blotting, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3). Interestingly, we observed Ctcf expression compensation at the protein level in all tissues except spleen, in which the Ctcf expression was less than 40% of WT Ctcf protein levels. Apart from the spleen, the increase in Ctcf expression from DNA to RNA and protein suggests that a post-transcriptional dosage compensation of Ctcf may have occurred (Fig. 1B).
Figure 1.

Ctcf haploinsufficiency as a model to study Ctcf-mediated transcriptome changes

Ctcf haploinsufficiency as a model to study Ctcf-mediated transcriptome changes We performed transcriptome analysis in all five tissues to examine differential gene regulation and differential AS between WT and Ctcf+/- mice. Ctcf transcript read counts assessed by RNA-seq in Ctcf+/- mice were significantly decreased in all tissues (33–39%) compared to WT mice (Fig. 2A). Differential gene expression analysis revealed that Ctcf haploinsufficiency exerts distinct tissue-specific effects. We detected at least 400 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) per tissue (a total of 3,746 DEGs in all tissues) (Supplementary Table 1). In all tissues other than liver, we detected an overall increase in gene expression (Fig. 2B), supporting Ctcf’s role as a transcriptional repressor [6].
Figure 2.

Differential gene expression and alternative splicing in Ctcf+/- mice

Differential gene expression and alternative splicing in Ctcf+/- mice Apart from Ctcf, only six genes (Carmil2, Gm38250, Gsto2, H2-Q7, Thap12 and Zcwpw1) were consistently differentially expressed in all five tissues (Fig. 2C). Carmil2, located adjacent to Ctcf at 8qD3, was upregulated in Ctcf+/- mice, which was also observed in a similar hemizygous Ctcf+/- mouse model [31]. ZCWPW1 in humans is located within a CTCF-mediated TAD and contains a CTCF-bound intronic enhancer. A polymorphism (rs1476679) in this enhancer has been associated with increased disease risk in late onset-Alzheimer’s disease by affecting CTCF binding and chromatin topology [32,33]. A relationship between Ctcf and the other four genes has not been established yet. Gene Ontology (GO)-based annotation enrichment analysis of all the significant DEGs revealed a strong enrichment of tissue-specific biological processes (Supplementary Fig. 4). GO terms related to metabolism, immune response, and cellular component organisation were commonly affected by Ctcf haploinsufficiency (Fig. 2D). These data confirm that a decrease in Ctcf dosage through haploinsufficiency can impact gene expression in a tissue-specific manner. To examine the effect of Ctcf haploinsufficiency on the AS landscape, we analysed differential AS events in Ctcf+/- using rMATS [34]. We found that exon skipping (ES) is the most abundant form of differential AS detected in all tissues (Supplementary Table 2). Notably, we observed a significant increase in IR events in the liver and kidney of Ctcf+/- mice (Fig. 2E), which is in contrast to all other forms of AS. However, a decrease in Ctcf-mediated IR events was only detected in Ctcf+/- muscle. Overall, our analysis shows that Ctcf haploinsufficiency not only affects gene expression but also perturbs the AS landscape in a tissue-specific manner.

Characterisation of intron retention in Ctcf

To confirm that Ctcf haploinsufficiency modulates IR in a tissue-specific manner, we used IRFinder, a software package specifically developed for the detection and quantification of IR [35-37]. We confirmed that IR is increased in Ctcf+/- liver and kidney with a total of 60 and 43 upregulated IR events, respectively. Only 1 and 5 IR events were downregulated in Ctcf+/- liver and kidney, respectively (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Table 3). Moreover, we detected that in some mRNA transcripts (5 in liver and 1 in kidney) multiple introns were differentially retained in the same transcript. There were no differential IR events common to all tissues.
Figure 3.

Validation and features of differentially retained introns in liver

Validation and features of differentially retained introns in liver As Ctcf haploinsufficient liver exhibited the most dramatic upregulation of IR, we explored these IR events for further validation and characterisation. First, we calculated the IR-ratio for all IR events (Supplementary Fig. 5A). The IR-ratio is the proportion of intron-retaining mRNA transcripts compared to all mRNA transcripts from the same gene. Consistent with previous studies, we considered IR events with an IR-ratio ≥0.1 as biologically significant [35,38]. Since we previously showed that IR can reduce the expression of the host gene via nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) [36], we examined the intronic expression as well as expression of host mRNA. We observed that 65% of differential intron-retaining genes, whether up- or downregulated, exhibited increased gene expression (Supplementary Fig. 5B). This suggests that Ctcf haploinsufficiency triggers both the upregulation of expression and IR-ratios of intron-retaining genes in liver. Next, we selected five candidates exhibiting increased IR, including Gadd45g, Plk3, Rfx5, Ppox and Setd4 (Fig. 3B), for validation by RT-qPCR. We confirmed a significant increase in retained introns in all five genes (Fig. 3C); however, the impact on host mRNA expression varied (Fig. 3D). We have recently summarised all possible fates of intron-retaining transcripts [39,40]. Apart from their degradation via NMD, fates include the nuclear detention of intron-retaining transcripts, the synthesis of novel protein isoforms, or their cellular translocation. To characterise the liver-specific intron-retaining genes, we performed annotation enrichment analysis and found that the affected genes are associated with biological processes and pathways related to metabolism, cytoskeletal organisation, RNA splicing and mRNA processing (Fig. 3E). These findings show that Ctcf haploinsufficiency mediates IR of specific introns in liver genes involved in splicing- and metabolism-related processes. In addition, we found a significant association between Ctcf+/–-regulated DEGs and IR (p-value = 0.01, Fisher’s exact test). We next examined the molecular features of significantly differential IR events (n = 60) identified in Ctcf+/- liver compared to expressed non-retained introns (n = 1,160) and found that differentially retained introns are shorter (p-value = 3.3e-6, Fig. 3F) and have a higher GC content than non-retained introns (p-value = 7.7e-12, Fig. 3G), which is consistent with our previous reports [36,38,41]. To examine whether there is a correlation between these features and Ctcf+/– -mediated IR, we divided differentially retained introns and expressed non-retained introns, based on cut-off values of the median length (431 nt) and the mean GC content (45%) of all introns, into four groups: (i) short/GC-rich, (ii) short/GC-poor, (iii) long/GC-rich, (iv), and long/GC-poor (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Table 4). Interestingly, we found that 35 out of 60 (58.3%) differentially retained introns fall into the ‘short/GC-rich’ category, which constitutes 9% of all expressed short/GC-rich introns (p-value 2.5e-5, Fisher’s exact test).

Enrichment of Ctcf binding sites proximal to differentially retained introns

CTCF ChIP-seq studies have found that approximately 30% and 50% of CTCF binding sites are located in intronic and intergenic regions, respectively [2,5,9]. It has been shown that the intragenic localisation of CTCF binding sites influences pre-mRNA splicing decisions leading to alternative exon inclusion [20,21,25]. To determine whether Ctcf binding sites are enriched in the proximity of differentially retained introns in liver, we analysed a publicly available ChIP-seq dataset from C57BL/6 normal mouse liver (E-MTAB-5769) [42]. Knowing that regions containing CTCF binding sites are mostly characterised by high GC content [5,43], we propose that GC-rich introns proximal to these regions are predisposed to IR particularly if they are short. Since short/GC-rich introns constitute more than half of the Ctcf-mediated differentially retained introns (35 out of 60), we merged the other classes (i.e. short/GC-poor, long/GC-rich, and long/GC-poor) of differentially retained introns into one group (named: other). We examined Ctcf binding sites within the intron bodies as well as 200–50,000 nt upstream/downstream of differentially retained and expressed non-retained introns. The highest fold increase in Ctcf binding sites was observed upstream of differentially retained short/GC-rich introns (Fig. 4A). However, all differentially retained introns have a 2-fold increase in Ctcf binding sites in their ≤3,000 nt upstream region. These binding sites (n = 32) are primarily located in introns (50%), followed by intergenic regions (31.25%), and exons (18.75%, Fig. 4A). In the intron bodies, we observed a significantly higher percentage of the differentially retained short/GC-rich introns harbouring Ctcf binding sites compared to non-retained introns (11% vs. 4%, respectively, p-value = 0.02, Fisher’s exact test). However, the total number of introns harbouring Ctcf binding sites (retained: 9 short/GC-rich and 0 others; non-retained: 23 short/GC-rich and 107 others) was low. Overall, these findings suggest that the Ctcf haploinsufficiency-induced IR changes in liver mostly affect short, GC-rich introns with proximal Ctcf binding sites. We then compared our results from liver to ChIP-seq data from brain, kidney and spleen (GSE36027) but found no enrichment of IR-associated Ctcf binding sites in these data, suggesting that IR in Ctcf+/- liver is indeed regulated by Ctcf (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Figure 4.

Enrichment of Ctcf binding sites proximal to differentially retained introns

Enrichment of Ctcf binding sites proximal to differentially retained introns Since CTCF is known for its global role in transcriptional regulation and insulation [6], we wanted to determine whether manipulating Ctcf expression in vivo perturbs splicing factor expression. By assessing 371 splicing factors (i.e. genes annotated with the GO term ‘RNA splicing’; GO:0008380), we detected only minor changes in the expression of splicing factors (Supplementary Fig. 8A). Interestingly, we found that in Ctcf+/- liver a larger number of splicing factors, including Srsf1, Prpf40b, Thoc1, Khsrp and Zpr1, exhibit retained introns (Supplementary Fig. 8B). Given the fact that IR coupled with NMD can reduce protein synthesis [36], our data suggest that Ctcf haploinsufficiency may drive IR-mediated regulation of splicing factor expression. While the fate and role of these dysregulated splicing factors remain to be determined, it would be reasonable to assume that they may contribute to increased IR in liver.

Discussion

IR is a widespread and conserved mechanism of post-transcriptional gene expression regulation affecting over 80% of all protein coding genes [35]. For instance, we have previously shown that IR regulates differentiation across diverse haematopoietic lineages [36,38,41,44]. Moreover, the majority of cancer types have abundant IR events that affect their transcriptomes, including genes involved in RNA splicing [45,46]. Therefore, identifying the potential modulators of AS, particularly IR, is essential to fully comprehend the aetiology and molecular pathophysiology of cancer. Here, we demonstrate that Ctcf haploinsufficiency, which has previously been shown to induce spontaneous tumour formation in mice and genome-wide hypermethylation [17], also perturbs the AS landscape. Upon examining a number of tissues, we observed a specific increase of IR in Ctcf+/- liver and kidney. Moreover, we observed a similar tissue-specific effect of Ctcf haploinsufficiency on gene expression. Given that CTCF expression and DNA occupancy are variables between tissues [2-5,8,9], these differences may govern how CTCF specifically regulates the transcriptome and AS in tissues. While the impact of CTCF haploinsufficiency on the global AS landscape has not been previously investigated, we utilised this model to examine in vivo the global effect of Ctcf dose-dependent regulation on AS in specific tissues. Although we used Ctcf hemizygous mice, we and others have shown that any sustained decrease in CTCF expression is partially compensated at the protein levels [17,31]. However, with a less than 50% reduction (except spleen) of Ctcf mRNA and protein expression, we observed tissue-specific differences in gene expression and AS. These data suggest that more prominent effects might be observed with loss-of-function mutations or the inactivation of CTCF, which are commonly observed in cancer [7,47], or at an even lower CTCF dosage. However, we have previously shown that the enforced genetic ablation of CTCF has a negative impact on somatic cell viability [16]. Although the exact mechanism underlying Ctcf haploinsufficiency-mediated IR regulation remains to be characterised, several possibilities can be proposed based on our data and previous studies. An optimal RNA Pol II elongation rate is essential for constitutive splicing [48]; therefore, both slow and fast RNA Pol II elongation rates were observed to promote IR [49]. Slowing RNA Pol II elongation mediated by CTCF promoted exon inclusion in B-lymphoma cell lines, providing the first evidence for a role of CTCF in AS. Binding of CTCF downstream of CD45 exon 5 leads to decelerating RNA Pol II elongation, thus permitting exon 5 inclusion [20]. This mechanism is tightly regulated by cytosine methylation at CTCF binding sites in the DNA by the methylcytosine dioxygenases TET1 and TET2 [21]. In another example, CTCF binding to the BDNF2a locus was shown to be essential for its splicing by inhibiting TET1-induced DNA methylation and the subsequent interaction between TET1, MeCP2 and the splicing factor YB1 [22]. In contrast, DNA methylation at CTCF binding sites located upstream or downstream of alternatively spliced exons was associated with inclusion of exons [24]. Knowing that CTCF regulates DNA methylation and preserves methylation-free regions throughout the genome [50-52], we propose that CTCF regulates AS in a locus-dependent and tissue-specific manner. CTCF has been recognised as a coordinator of chromatin looping and architecture [53-55]. Of immediate relevance is the observation that the RNA Pol II elongation rate can be controlled by chromatin organisation and influence AS decisions [56,57]. A recent study showed that CTCF-mediated chromatin loops formed between promoters and intragenic regions, particularly at upstream sites of alternatively spliced exons, lead to exon inclusion [25]. However, this mechanism still requires further validation. Overall, these studies suggest a role for CTCF as a key modulator of splicing decisions at individual loci via different molecular and epigenetic mechanisms. Given its global transcriptional regulation and insulation functions [6], altering CTCF expression could perturb various transcriptional signalling pathways and subsequently AS. In this context, reduced CTCF expression was found to be associated with increased exon exclusion, particularly in those exons located 1 kb upstream of CTCF binding sites in BL41 and BJAB B-lymphoma cells [20]. This suggests that reduction of CTCF expression and the distribution of CTCF binding sites can influence pre-mRNA processing decisions. Consistent with that, we showed that enrichment of Ctcf binding sites upstream and downstream of differentially retained introns in liver is associated with increased IR. From these results, we speculate that CTCF may regulate IR through modulating the RNA Pol II elongation rate and methylation status at CTCF target binding sites located proximal to differentially retained introns (Fig. 4B). Our data support previous observations from our group and others that IR mostly affects introns which are short and GC-rich [36,38,58]. During granulocytic differentiation, some intron-retaining transcripts undergo NMD, triggered by premature termination codons located within the retained introns [36]. This process can lead to an overall reduction of gene expression consequent to IR. Here, we observed a net increase in gene expression in the liver of Ctcf+/- mice, suggesting an alternative predominant fate of intron-retaining transcripts. We observed that there was an enrichment of genes related to RNA splicing and metabolism among the intron-retaining genes. Splicing factors affected by IR particularly in Ctcf+/- liver and kidney such as Srsf1, Esrp2 and Prpf40b have been previously reported to be associated with the regulation of AS including IR [35,59,60]. In addition to splicing, genes involved in metabolic processes were affected by IR in Ctcf haploinsufficient liver. We previously reported that Ctcf haploinsufficient mice exhibit ~14% reduction in body weight during post-natal development [16]. Given that the liver plays an essential role in organismal metabolism, we propose that Ctcf-regulated IR in liver may affect metabolic genes and pathways that contribute to this body weight phenotype. Ctcf is a haploinsufficient tumour suppressor that induces spontaneous tumour formation in various mouse tissues including liver [17]. The liver exhibited the most abundant IR events observed in our study. Given the fact that IR is upregulated in most human cancers including liver cancer [45], a new link between CTCF haploinsufficiency and hepatocellular carcinoma causation via IR may be possible. In this study, we have further defined the role of Ctcf in AS regulation and found Ctcf dosage-dependent effects on tissue-specific gene expression. Our analysis of Ctcf binding sites around retained introns in normal liver confirmed their relevance especially in short and GC-rich introns. To gain a mechanistic understanding of tissue-specific IR in Ctcf haploinsufficiency, additional studies are required that focus on Ctcf DNA occupancy and the interplay with the epigenetic regulation of AS. Moreover, causal links between Ctcf haploinsufficiency, IR, and increased tumour formation should be further investigated.

Materials and methods

Mouse model, genotyping and organ collection

All mouse experiments were conducted in accordance with the New South Wales Animal Research Act 1985, and the Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes (8th edition 2013). Animal ethics approval for all mouse experiments was obtained from the Sydney Local Health District Animal Welfare Committee (Protocol number 2016/020). C57BL/6J female mice from Australian BioResources, Australia were used as breeding stock. Ctcf+/− mice were originally obtained on a mixed C57BL/6:129SvJ background from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre (Seattle, WA, USA) as a kind gift from Galina Filippova. These mice were previously backcrossed onto C57Bl/6J mice for at least 10 generations. Ctcf+/- mice contain a hemizygous deletion of the entire Ctcf coding region and substituted with an expression cassette containing the 3-phosphoglycerate kinase promoter and Neomycin gene flanked by two loxP sites (Pgk-Neo) [15,16]. Genotyping primers used to distinguish WT and Ctcf+/- alleles were Ctcf-WT-5ʹ (CTCACGCCTGAGATGATCC), Ctcf-WT-3ʹ (CATGCCATCCTACTGGTGTG) and Ctcf-neo-5ʹ (TGGGCTCTATGGCTTCTGAG). The resultant amplicons represent the WT allele (519 bp) and PGK-Neo-containing allele (348 bp). Six healthy female C57BL/6 Ctcf+/+ and Ctcf+/- mice (3 each) were utilised. At 11 weeks of age, two litters, one containing 2xWT and 2xCtcf+/- female mice, the other containing one WT and one Ctcf+/- female mouse each were euthanised by carbon dioxide asphyxiation as recommended by the institutional animal welfare guidelines. Organs of interest (brain, kidney, liver, muscle and spleen) were collected and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C.

Protein extraction and quantitation

To extract protein from mouse organs, a small piece of the organ was minced in ice-cold RIPA protein lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCL (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% (w/v)sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), 0.5% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 1% (v/v) NP-40 and 0.02% (w/v) sodium azide in distilled H2O with the addition of 1X EDTA-free SIGMAFAST protease cocktail tablet (Sigma). To quantify protein in the tissue lysates, the Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Western blot, antibodies and densitometry

For Western blot analysis, protein extracts were prepared as equal aliquots (10 μg) and boiled in 2X protein loading buffer containing NuPAGE LDS Sample Buffer and 100 mM Dithiothreitol (DTT) for 5 minutes. The samples were then resolved by 4–12% SDS-PAGE using NuPAGE Bis-Tris Protein Gel system (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore) in a semi-dry transfer apparatus. Rabbit polyclonal anti-CTCF (1:2,000; #3418, Cell Signalling) or mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH (1:5,000 dilution; ab8245; Abcam) was used as a primary antibody, followed by washing and staining with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (1:5,000 dilution; Merck Millipore), respectively. A Chemidoc Touch (BioRad) was used to visualise the protein bands on these replicate blots, which were subjected to densitometric analysis using ImageJ software.

RNA isolation, purification and quantitation

To isolate RNA from WT and Ctcf+/- tissues of interest, a small piece of tissue (<30 mg weight) was homogenised with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) followed by isopropanol precipitation at −80°C. Next, contaminating DNA was eliminated by using the TURBO DNA-free kit (Invitrogen). The RNA quantitation and quality were assessed by NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Only samples with a 260/280 nm absorbance ratio of 1.9 or above were used. The RNA integrity was evaluated using a 2100 Bioanalyzer with the RNA 6000 Nano kit (Agilent) where samples with an RNA integrity number (RIN) below 7 were excluded.

RT-qPCR

To determine the relative expression level of Ctcf mRNA, cDNA was synthesised using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) followed by RNaseOUT treatment (Invitrogen). Next, qPCR was performed on the cDNA with SYBR Green (Bio-Rad) and Ctcf-specific forward (CCACCTGCCAAGAAGAGAAG) and reverse (CGACCTGAATGATGGCTGTT) primers, and subsequently run on a CFX96 real-time PCR machine (BioRad). Primers detecting Hprt were used to normalise gene expression: forward (AGTGTTGGATACAGGCCAGAC) and reverse (CGTGATTCAAATCCCTGAAGT). The fold-change was calculated using the 2–∆∆Ct method. The Ctcf mRNA expression levels in Ctcf+/- mouse tissues were normalised to WT to obtain the relative mRNA expression.

RNA sequencing

A total of 30 RNA samples (five tissues collected from three biological replicates each of WT and Ctcf+/- mice), which met the quality control parameters described above, were sent to Novogene (Beijing, China) for library preparation (strand-specific, poly-A enriched) and RNA-seq (150 bp paired-end reads, over 100 million reads) using the Illumina HiSeq-PE150 platform.

Bioinformatic analysis

Initial quality control of the RNA-seq raw data was conducted using FastQC (bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) and MultiQC (multiqc.info) to check for sequencing quality prior to analysis [61]. After passing the quality control check, reads were mapped to the mouse reference genome GRCm38/mm10 using STAR software [62]. To examine differential gene expression in WT and Ctcf+/- tissue samples, read counts were determined using featureCounts 1.5.0-p3 [63] and then subjected to differential gene expression analysis using the R Bioconductor package DESeq2 1.25.15 [64]. Genes with low read counts (<5) across all samples were removed. Differential AS was analysed using rMATS 4.0.1 [34], while further analysis of differential IR was performed using IRFinder 1.2.5 [35]. Specific IR features such as intron length and GC content were calculated using BEDTools v2.26.0 [65]. GO analysis of differentially expressed genes and intron-retaining genes were performed using the DAVID 6.8 online tool [66].

Validation of retained-intron candidates

Several candidates from the subset of intron-retaining transcripts in Ctcf+/- liver were selected for validation by RT-qPCR according to stringent filtering parameters from the main IRFinder output file. These filtering parameters included mean IR-ratio ≥0.1, mean intron coverage >75%, mean intron depth ≥5 reads, mean splice junction depth ≥20 reads, and p-value of IR-ratio fold-change between WT and Ctcf+/- samples <0.05. Further details of these parameters are provided in the IRFinder manual (github.com/williamritchie/IRFinder/wiki). Selected differentially retained introns were also visually inspected using the Integrative Genomics Viewer software (software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/). On the other hand, expressed non-retained introns were selected for analyses based on the following criteria: (i) mean IR-ratio = 0 and (ii) mean splice junction depth >50 (as surrogate for expression). Next, the selected candidates were validated by RT-qPCR using a set of three specific primers (Supplementary Table 5). To measure the relative mRNA expression, two primers were used to amplify sequence spanning the exonic region adjacent to the retained intron (Forward) to cross the exon-exon junction flanking the retained intron (Reverse 1). To measure the retained intron in the target spliced isoform, a third primer was designed to anneal within the intronic region of the retained intron (Reverse 2). Finally, the relative mRNA expression was calculated as described above while intron-retaining transcript expression was calculated after normalising its expression to the expression of the intron’s flanking exons.

Enrichment of Ctcf binding sites

To examine enrichment of Ctcf binding sites, we obtained publicly available ChIP-seq datasets from C57BL/6 normal mouse liver (E-MTAB-5769) [42] as well as brain, kidney, and spleen (GSE36027) [4]. We could not find ChIP-seq data from muscle. The Ctcf ChIP-seq peaks were then intersected with differentially retained introns and expressed non-retained introns. To identify Ctcf binding sites, the FASTA sequences of the detected Ctcf peaks in the region located up to 3000 nt upstream of the differentially retained introns were first retrieved using BEDTools v2.26.0 [65]. Next, these sequences were scanned for the CTCF binding motif from JASPAR2020 database [67] using the FIMO program from the MEME suite v.4.12.0 [68,69].

Statistical analysis

The data from this study was analysed using different statistical tests relevant to the type of experiment or analysis. Wald test and unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (as indicated in Figure legends) were used to determine statistical significance. P-values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant. All error bars shown in the figures represent standard error of the mean (SEM) from at least three independent experiments. The GraphPad Prism software version 7 as well as R Bioconductor were used to perform the statistical data analyses. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  69 in total

1.  TET-catalyzed oxidation of intragenic 5-methylcytosine regulates CTCF-dependent alternative splicing.

Authors:  Ryan J Marina; David Sturgill; Marc A Bailly; Morgan Thenoz; Garima Varma; Maria F Prigge; Kyster K Nanan; Sanjeev Shukla; Nazmul Haque; Shalini Oberdoerffer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Developing in 3D: the role of CTCF in cell differentiation.

Authors:  Rodrigo G Arzate-Mejía; Félix Recillas-Targa; Victor G Corces
Journal:  Development       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Intragenic DNA methylation alters chromatin structure and elongation efficiency in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Matthew C Lorincz; David R Dickerson; Mike Schmitt; Mark Groudine
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2004-10-03       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Determination of a Comprehensive Alternative Splicing Regulatory Network and Combinatorial Regulation by Key Factors during the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition.

Authors:  Yueqin Yang; Juw Won Park; Thomas W Bebee; Claude C Warzecha; Yang Guo; Xuequn Shang; Yi Xing; Russ P Carstens
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Comprehensive identification and annotation of cell type-specific and ubiquitous CTCF-binding sites in the human genome.

Authors:  Hebing Chen; Yao Tian; Wenjie Shu; Xiaochen Bo; Shengqi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Loss of maternal CTCF is associated with peri-implantation lethality of Ctcf null embryos.

Authors:  James M Moore; Natalia A Rabaia; Leslie E Smith; Sara Fagerlie; Kay Gurley; Dmitry Loukinov; Christine M Disteche; Steven J Collins; Christopher J Kemp; Victor V Lobanenkov; Galina N Filippova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report.

Authors:  Philip Ewels; Måns Magnusson; Sverker Lundin; Max Käller
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Intron retention is regulated by altered MeCP2-mediated splicing factor recruitment.

Authors:  Justin J-L Wong; Dadi Gao; Trung V Nguyen; Chau-To Kwok; Michelle van Geldermalsen; Rob Middleton; Natalia Pinello; Annora Thoeng; Rajini Nagarajah; Jeff Holst; William Ritchie; John E J Rasko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Repeat associated mechanisms of genome evolution and function revealed by the Mus caroli and Mus pahari genomes.

Authors:  David Thybert; Maša Roller; Fábio C P Navarro; Ian Fiddes; Ian Streeter; Christine Feig; David Martin-Galvez; Mikhail Kolmogorov; Václav Janoušek; Wasiu Akanni; Bronwen Aken; Sarah Aldridge; Varshith Chakrapani; William Chow; Laura Clarke; Carla Cummins; Anthony Doran; Matthew Dunn; Leo Goodstadt; Kerstin Howe; Matthew Howell; Ambre-Aurore Josselin; Robert C Karn; Christina M Laukaitis; Lilue Jingtao; Fergal Martin; Matthieu Muffato; Stefanie Nachtweide; Michael A Quail; Cristina Sisu; Mario Stanke; Klara Stefflova; Cock Van Oosterhout; Frederic Veyrunes; Ben Ward; Fengtang Yang; Golbahar Yazdanifar; Amonida Zadissa; David J Adams; Alvis Brazma; Mark Gerstein; Benedict Paten; Son Pham; Thomas M Keane; Duncan T Odom; Paul Flicek
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  DamC reveals principles of chromatin folding in vivo without crosslinking and ligation.

Authors:  Josef Redolfi; Yinxiu Zhan; Christian Valdes-Quezada; Mariya Kryzhanovska; Isabel Guerreiro; Vytautas Iesmantavicius; Tim Pollex; Ralph S Grand; Eskeatnaf Mulugeta; Jop Kind; Guido Tiana; Sebastien A Smallwood; Wouter de Laat; Luca Giorgetti
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  4 in total

1.  Exosomal CTCF Confers Cisplatin Resistance in Osteosarcoma by Promoting Autophagy via the IGF2-AS/miR-579-3p/MSH6 Axis.

Authors:  Haibo Zhan; Jun Xiao; Po Wang; Fengbo Mo; Kaihuang Li; Fengfen Guo; Xiaolong Yu; Xuqiang Liu; Bin Zhang; Min Dai; Hucheng Liu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.501

Review 2.  CTCF: A misguided jack-of-all-trades in cancer cells.

Authors:  Julie Segueni; Daan Noordermeer
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.155

3.  RNA helicase-dependent gene looping impacts messenger RNA processing.

Authors:  Sophie Terrone; Jessica Valat; Nicolas Fontrodona; Guillaume Giraud; Jean-Baptiste Claude; Emmanuel Combe; Audrey Lapendry; Hélène Polvèche; Lamya Ben Ameur; Arnaud Duvermy; Laurent Modolo; Pascal Bernard; Franck Mortreux; Didier Auboeuf; Cyril F Bourgeois
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 19.160

4.  3D chromatin remodeling potentiates transcriptional programs driving cell invasion.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebeau; Maïka Jangal; Tiejun Zhao; Cheng Kit Wong; Nolan Wong; Eduardo Cepeda Cañedo; Steven Hébert; Adriana Aguilar-Mahecha; Catherine Chabot; Marguerite Buchanan; Rachel Catterall; Luke McCaffrey; Geneviève Deblois; Claudia Kleinman; Morag Park; Mark Basik; Michael Witcher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 12.779

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.