Literature DB >> 32816542

Policy Views and Negative Beliefs About Vaccines in the United States, 2019.

Dominik A Stecula1, Ozan Kuru1, Dolores Albarracin1, Kathleen Hall Jamieson1.   

Abstract

Objectives. To determine whether holding vaccine misconceptions, in the form of negative beliefs about vaccines, correlates with opposing governmental action at all levels designed to increase vaccination (e.g., removing personal belief and religious vaccine exemptions).Methods. Drawing on data from a nationally representative survey of 1938 US adults, we assessed the relation between negative beliefs about vaccines and provaccination policies.Results. Beyond sociodemographic and policy-relevant variables, such as gender and partisan affiliation, questionable negative beliefs about vaccines are the strongest predictor of opposition to policies designed to increase vaccination.Conclusions. Negative beliefs about vaccines in the general population may thwart the passage or implementation of policies designed to increase vaccination. Implementing strategies that reduce these negative beliefs should be a priority of educators and public health officials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32816542      PMCID: PMC7483112          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   11.561


  3 in total

1.  Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies.

Authors:  Richard M Carpiano; Nicholas S Fitz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Vaccine Rejection and Hesitancy: A Review and Call to Action.

Authors:  Tara C Smith
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.835

3.  The state of the antivaccine movement in the United States: A focused examination of nonmedical exemptions in states and counties.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Olive; Peter J Hotez; Ashish Damania; Melissa S Nolan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 11.069

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Religious affiliation and philosophical and moral beliefs about vaccines: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ozan Kuru; Man-Pui Sally Chan; Hang Lu; Dominik Andrzej Stecula; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2022-03-15

2.  Quantifying the effect of Wakefield et al. (1998) on skepticism about MMR vaccine safety in the U.S.

Authors:  Matthew Motta; Dominik Stecula
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Hesitancy in a Sample of US Adults: Role of Perceived Satisfaction With Health, Access to Healthcare, and Attention to COVID-19 News.

Authors:  Sarah Bauerle Bass; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Dina T Garcia; Aderonke A Akinkugbe; Maghboeba Mosavel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-29

4.  Attitudes towards influenza vaccine and a potential COVID-19 vaccine in Italy and differences across occupational groups, September 2020.

Authors:  Carlo La Vecchia; Eva Negri; Gianfranco Alicandro; Vilma Scarpino
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 1.275

5.  The effects of scientific messages and narratives about vaccination.

Authors:  Ozan Kuru; Dominik Stecula; Hang Lu; Yotam Ophir; Man-Pui Sally Chan; Ken Winneg; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A behavioral economics perspective on the COVID-19 vaccine amid public mistrust.

Authors:  Jessica Londeree Saleska; Kristen R Choi
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Vax attacks: How conspiracy theory belief undermines vaccine support.

Authors:  Christina E Farhart; Ella Douglas-Durham; Krissy Lunz Trujillo; Joseph A Vitriol
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.622

8.  Public Preferences for Policies to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: A Discrete Choice Experiment in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Niek Mouter; Sander Boxebeld; Roselinde Kessels; Maarten van Wijhe; Ardine de Wit; Mattijs Lambooij; Job van Exel
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 5.101

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.