INTRODUCTION: Extensive marketing and advertising research has informed a deep understanding of the link between visual design and consumer behaviors, providing a useful framework for assessing associations between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related health posters and viewer responses. METHODS: Crowdsourced posters included finalist submissions from a series of nationwide crowdsourcing contests. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) images were sampled from an online poster database maintained by the National Center for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Once coded according to a set of 27 visual features, posters were shown to an online sample of Chinese men who have sex with men-a group currently experiencing the highest HIV incidence in China-to assess their viewer response. RESULTS: The CDC posters were more likely to use positive facial expressions (65%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 40.9-83.7] vs 12.5%; 95% CI, 2.2-4%) and an educational messaging style (85%; 95% CI, 61.1-96% vs 31.3%; 95% CI, 12.1-58.5). Crowdsourced posters exhibited better craftsmanship than CDC posters (more design simplicity, image diversity, color choice, design quality, and moderate use of text) used more visual metaphors (56.3%; 95% CI, 30.6-79.2 vs 5%; [95% CI, 0.2-26.9%]). Several differences in visual complexity were identified but these lacked statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Crowdsourced posters were of higher craftsmanship, possibly due to their ability to recruit skills of professional designers. The CDC posters' use of positive visual reinforcement (smiling faces) and educational messaging may be a legacy of their role in the early days of the epidemic in disseminating basic HIV/AIDS knowledge and dispelling misinformation. Crowdsourcing posters' used more metaphors, suggesting better ability to leverage in-group codes and language.
INTRODUCTION: Extensive marketing and advertising research has informed a deep understanding of the link between visual design and consumer behaviors, providing a useful framework for assessing associations between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related health posters and viewer responses. METHODS: Crowdsourced posters included finalist submissions from a series of nationwide crowdsourcing contests. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) images were sampled from an online poster database maintained by the National Center for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Once coded according to a set of 27 visual features, posters were shown to an online sample of Chinese men who have sex with men-a group currently experiencing the highest HIV incidence in China-to assess their viewer response. RESULTS: The CDC posters were more likely to use positive facial expressions (65%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 40.9-83.7] vs 12.5%; 95% CI, 2.2-4%) and an educational messaging style (85%; 95% CI, 61.1-96% vs 31.3%; 95% CI, 12.1-58.5). Crowdsourced posters exhibited better craftsmanship than CDC posters (more design simplicity, image diversity, color choice, design quality, and moderate use of text) used more visual metaphors (56.3%; 95% CI, 30.6-79.2 vs 5%; [95% CI, 0.2-26.9%]). Several differences in visual complexity were identified but these lacked statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Crowdsourced posters were of higher craftsmanship, possibly due to their ability to recruit skills of professional designers. The CDC posters' use of positive visual reinforcement (smiling faces) and educational messaging may be a legacy of their role in the early days of the epidemic in disseminating basic HIV/AIDS knowledge and dispelling misinformation. Crowdsourcing posters' used more metaphors, suggesting better ability to leverage in-group codes and language.
Authors: Jennifer L Gardy; James C Johnston; Shannan J Ho Sui; Victoria J Cook; Lena Shah; Elizabeth Brodkin; Shirley Rempel; Richard Moore; Yongjun Zhao; Robert Holt; Richard Varhol; Inanc Birol; Marcus Lem; Meenu K Sharma; Kevin Elwood; Steven J M Jones; Fiona S L Brinkman; Robert C Brunham; Patrick Tang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ye Zhang; Julie A Kim; Fengying Liu; Lai Sze Tso; Weiming Tang; Chongyi Wei; Barry L Bayus; Joseph D Tucker Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Weiming Tang; Larry Han; John Best; Ye Zhang; Katie Mollan; Julie Kim; Fengying Liu; Michael Hudgens; Barry Bayus; Fern Terris-Prestholt; Sam Galler; Ligang Yang; Rosanna Peeling; Paul Volberding; Baoli Ma; Huifang Xu; Bin Yang; Shujie Huang; Kevin Fenton; Chongyi Wei; Joseph D Tucker Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Weiming Tang; Chongyi Wei; Bolin Cao; Dan Wu; Katherine T Li; Haidong Lu; Wei Ma; Dianmin Kang; Haochu Li; Meizhen Liao; Katie R Mollan; Michael G Hudgens; Chuncheng Liu; Wenting Huang; Aifeng Liu; Ye Zhang; M Kumi Smith; Kate M Mitchell; Jason J Ong; Hongyun Fu; Peter Vickerman; Ligang Yang; Cheng Wang; Heping Zheng; Bin Yang; Joseph D Tucker Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Sean J Upshaw; Jakob D Jensen; Elizabeth A Giorgi; Manusheela Pokharel; Helen M Lillie; Dallin R Adams; Kevin K John; Yelena P Wu; Douglas Grossman Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2022-09-20
Authors: William C W Wong; Gifty Marley; Jingjing Li; Weihui Yan; Po-Lin Chan; Joseph D Tucker; Weiming Tang; Yuxin Ni; Dan Dan Cheng; Lou Cong; Wai-Kay Seto Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2022-07-19