Samuel W Hulbert1,2, Xiaoming Wang3, Simisola O Gbadegesin3, Qiong Xu4, Xiu Xu4, Yong-Hui Jiang1,2,3. 1. Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 2. Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 4. The Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
Mutations in CHD8 are among the most common autism-causing genetic defects identified in human genomics studies. Therefore, many labs have attempted to model this disorder by generating mice with mutations in Chd8. Using a gene trap inserted after Exon 31, we created a novel Chd8 mutant mouse (Chd8+/E31T ) and characterized its behavior on several different assays thought to have face validity for the human condition, attempting to model both the core symptoms (repetitive behaviors and social communication impairments) and common comorbidities (motor deficits, anxiety, and intellectual disability). We found that Chd8+/E31T mice showed no difference compared to wild-type mice in amount of self-grooming, reproducing the negative finding most other studies have reported. Unlike some of the other published lines, Chd8+/E31T mice did not show deficits in the three-chamber test for social novelty preference. A few studies have examined ultrasonic vocalizations in Chd8 mutant mice, but we are the first to report an increase in call length for adult mice. Additionally, we found that in contrast to previous published lines, Chd8+/E31T mice displayed no anxiety-like behaviors or learning impairments but showed paradoxically significant improvement in motor function. The inconsistencies in behavioral phenotypes in the Chd8 mutant mice generated by different laboratories poses a challenge for modeling autism spectrum disorder and preclinical studies in mice going forward and warrants further investigation into the molecular consequences of the different mutations in Chd8 and the functional impact on behavior. LAY SUMMARY: Several different mouse models carrying mutations in the Chd8 gene have been created to study the effects of these autism-causing mutations in the laboratory. The current study characterizes a novel Chd8 mutant mouse model as well as summarizes data from previously published Chd8 mutant mice. The inconsistencies between different studies are concerning, but future research into the reasons why these inconsistencies occur may help us understand why patients with various mutations have different degrees of symptom severity. Autism Res 2020, 13: 1685-1697.
Mutations in CHD8 are among the most common autism-causing genetic defects identified in human genomics studies. Therefore, many labs have attempted to model this disorder by generating mice with mutations in Chd8. Using a gene trap inserted after Exon 31, we created a novel Chd8 mutant mouse (Chd8+/E31T ) and characterized its behavior on several different assays thought to have face validity for the human condition, attempting to model both the core symptoms (repetitive behaviors and social communication impairments) and common comorbidities (motor deficits, anxiety, and intellectual disability). We found that Chd8+/E31Tmice showed no difference compared to wild-type mice in amount of self-grooming, reproducing the negative finding most other studies have reported. Unlike some of the other published lines, Chd8+/E31Tmice did not show deficits in the three-chamber test for social novelty preference. A few studies have examined ultrasonic vocalizations in Chd8 mutant mice, but we are the first to report an increase in call length for adult mice. Additionally, we found that in contrast to previous published lines, Chd8+/E31Tmice displayed no anxiety-like behaviors or learning impairments but showed paradoxically significant improvement in motor function. The inconsistencies in behavioral phenotypes in the Chd8 mutant mice generated by different laboratories poses a challenge for modeling autism spectrum disorder and preclinical studies in mice going forward and warrants further investigation into the molecular consequences of the different mutations in Chd8 and the functional impact on behavior. LAY SUMMARY: Several different mouse models carrying mutations in the Chd8 gene have been created to study the effects of these autism-causing mutations in the laboratory. The current study characterizes a novel Chd8 mutant mouse model as well as summarizes data from previously published Chd8 mutant mice. The inconsistencies between different studies are concerning, but future research into the reasons why these inconsistencies occur may help us understand why patients with various mutations have different degrees of symptom severity. Autism Res 2020, 13: 1685-1697.
Authors: Heba Yasin; William T Gibson; Sylvie Langlois; Robert M Stowe; Erica S Tsang; Leora Lee; Jenny Poon; Grant Tran; Christine Tyson; Chi Kin Wong; Marco A Marra; Jan M Friedman; Farah R Zahir Journal: J Hum Genet Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 3.172
Authors: Melissa K Licari; Gail A Alvares; Kandice Varcin; Kiah L Evans; Dominique Cleary; Siobhan L Reid; Emma J Glasson; Keely Bebbington; Jess E Reynolds; John Wray; Andrew J O Whitehouse Journal: Autism Res Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Philipp Suetterlin; Shaun Hurley; Conor Mohan; Kimberley L H Riegman; Marco Pagani; Angela Caruso; Jacob Ellegood; Alberto Galbusera; Ivan Crespo-Enriquez; Caterina Michetti; Yohan Yee; Robert Ellingford; Olivier Brock; Alessio Delogu; Philippa Francis-West; Jason P Lerch; Maria Luisa Scattoni; Alessandro Gozzi; Cathy Fernandes; M Albert Basson Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Raphael Bernier; Christelle Golzio; Bo Xiong; Holly A Stessman; Bradley P Coe; Osnat Penn; Kali Witherspoon; Jennifer Gerdts; Carl Baker; Anneke T Vulto-van Silfhout; Janneke H Schuurs-Hoeijmakers; Marco Fichera; Paolo Bosco; Serafino Buono; Antonino Alberti; Pinella Failla; Hilde Peeters; Jean Steyaert; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Ludmila Francescatto; Heather C Mefford; Jill A Rosenfeld; Trygve Bakken; Brian J O'Roak; Matthew Pawlus; Randall Moon; Jay Shendure; David G Amaral; Ed Lein; Julia Rankin; Corrado Romano; Bert B A de Vries; Nicholas Katsanis; Evan E Eichler Journal: Cell Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 41.582