Timothy P Turkstra1,2, Daniel C Turkstra3, Alexander W Pavlosky4, Philip M Jones1,5. 1. Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital, Room C3-113, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada. 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 4. Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, ON, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Intubation-associated trauma with the GlideScope is rare, but when it occurs, it is likely due to advancing the endotracheal tube (ETT) blindly between the direct view of the oropharynx and the video view of the glottis. It is also occasionally difficult to advance the ETT to the glottic aperture despite a good view of the glottis on the monitor. One technique to potentially address both issues is to introduce the ETT en bloc with the GlideScope, thus visualizing the ETT tip throughout its entire path. We hypothesized that this en bloc technique could be faster and potentially easier than the standard technique. METHODS:Fifty patients with normal-appearing airways who required orotracheal intubation for elective surgery were randomly allocated to intubation with either the en bloc or the standard (GlideScope-first-then-ETT) technique. A three-dimensional printed clip was utilized to secure the ETT to the GlideScope during en bloc insertion. The primary outcome was time to intubation, defined from mask removal to first end-tidal carbon dioxide detection, recorded by a blinded observer. Secondary outcomes were subjective ease of intubation (100-mm visual analogue scale [VAS], 0 = easy; 100 = difficult), number of intubation attempts/failures, and incidence of oropharyngeal trauma (bleeding). RESULTS: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] intubation time was 36 [31-42] sec with the en bloc technique vs 41 [37-50] sec with the standard technique (difference in medians, 5 sec; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 11; P = 0.008). The median [IQR] ease of intubationVAS was 11 [9-21] mm with the en bloc technique, and 15 [11-24] mm with the standard technique (difference in medians, 4 mm; 95% CI, -2 to 8; P = 0.19). Laryngoscopic grade and number of intubation attempts were similar between the groups; there was no oropharyngeal trauma noted. CONCLUSION: In this study of video laryngoscopy, intubation was slightly faster with the en bloc technique than with the standard GlideScope intubation technique, although the clinical importance of this difference is unknown. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02787629); registered 1 June 2016.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Intubation-associated trauma with the GlideScope is rare, but when it occurs, it is likely due to advancing the endotracheal tube (ETT) blindly between the direct view of the oropharynx and the video view of the glottis. It is also occasionally difficult to advance the ETT to the glottic aperture despite a good view of the glottis on the monitor. One technique to potentially address both issues is to introduce the ETT en bloc with the GlideScope, thus visualizing the ETT tip throughout its entire path. We hypothesized that this en bloc technique could be faster and potentially easier than the standard technique. METHODS: Fifty patients with normal-appearing airways who required orotracheal intubation for elective surgery were randomly allocated to intubation with either the en bloc or the standard (GlideScope-first-then-ETT) technique. A three-dimensional printed clip was utilized to secure the ETT to the GlideScope during en bloc insertion. The primary outcome was time to intubation, defined from mask removal to first end-tidal carbon dioxide detection, recorded by a blinded observer. Secondary outcomes were subjective ease of intubation (100-mm visual analogue scale [VAS], 0 = easy; 100 = difficult), number of intubation attempts/failures, and incidence of oropharyngeal trauma (bleeding). RESULTS: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] intubation time was 36 [31-42] sec with the en bloc technique vs 41 [37-50] sec with the standard technique (difference in medians, 5 sec; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 11; P = 0.008). The median [IQR] ease of intubation VAS was 11 [9-21] mm with the en bloc technique, and 15 [11-24] mm with the standard technique (difference in medians, 4 mm; 95% CI, -2 to 8; P = 0.19). Laryngoscopic grade and number of intubation attempts were similar between the groups; there was no oropharyngeal trauma noted. CONCLUSION: In this study of video laryngoscopy, intubation was slightly faster with the en bloc technique than with the standard GlideScope intubation technique, although the clinical importance of this difference is unknown. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02787629); registered 1 June 2016.
Authors: J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; George Kovacs Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 5.063