Literature DB >> 32815055

Religiosity and Spirituality of Resident Physicians and Implications for Clinical Practice-the SBRAMER Multicenter Study.

Ana Paula Sena Lomba Vasconcelos1, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti1, Ana Paula Rodrigues Cavalcanti2, Simone Regina Souza da Silva Conde3, Lidia Maria Gonçalves4, Filipe Rodrigues do Nascimento5, Ana Cláudia Santos Chazan6, Rubens Lene Carvalho Tavares7, Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel1, Giancarlo Lucchetti8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the attitudes, knowledge, and experiences of Brazilian resident physicians regarding religiosity/spirituality (R/S), factors associated with addressing this issue, and its influence on clinical practice.
METHODS: We report results of the multicenter "Spirituality in Brazilian Medical Residents" (SBRAMER) study involving 7 Brazilian university centers. The Network for Research Spirituality and Health (NERSH) scale (collecting sociodemographic data, opinions about the R/S-health interface, and respondents' R/S characteristics) and the Duke Religion Index were self-administered. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine those factors associated with residents' opinions on spirituality in clinical practice.
RESULTS: The sample comprised 879 resident physicians (53.5% of total) from all years of residency with 71.6% from clinical specialties. In general, the residents considered themselves spiritual and religious, despite not regularly attending religious services. Most participants believed R/S had an important influence on patient health (75.2%) and that it was appropriate to discuss these beliefs in clinical encounters with patients (77.1%), although this was not done in routine clinical practice (14.4%). The main barriers to discussing R/S were maintaining professional neutrality (31.4%), concern about offending patients (29.1%), and insufficient time (26.2%). Factors including female gender, clinical specialty (e.g., internal medicine, family medicine, psychiatry) as opposed to surgical specialty (e.g., surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, orthopedics), having had formal training on R/S, and higher levels of R/S were associated with greater discussion of and more positive opinions about R/S.
CONCLUSION: Brazilian resident physicians held that religious and spiritual beliefs can influence health, and deemed it appropriate for physicians to discuss this issue. However, lack of training was one of the main obstacles to addressing R/S issues in clinical practice. Educators should draw on these data to conduct interventions and produce content on the subject in residency programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  graduate students; medical education; medical residents; religion and medicine; resident physicians; spirituality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32815055      PMCID: PMC7728988          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06145-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  3 in total

1.  Spirituality and health care education in family medicine residency programs.

Authors:  Dana E King; Jeremy Crisp
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Spirituality and medicine: views and opinions of teachers in a Brazilian medical school.

Authors:  Luís Gustavo Langoni Mariotti; Giancarlo Lucchetti; Marina Ferreira Dantas; Vanessa Burgugi Banin; Fernanda Fumelli; Niura Aparecida De Moura Ribeiro Padula
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Religion index for psychiatric research.

Authors:  H Koenig; G R Parkerson; K G Meador
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 18.112

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Role of Spirituality and Religion in Physician and Trainee Wellness.

Authors:  Kristin M Collier; Cornelius A James; Sanjay Saint; Joel Howell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Physicians' religious/spiritual characteristics and their behavior regarding religiosity and spirituality in clinical practice: A meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Authors:  Alex K Kørup; Jens Søndergaard; Giancarlo Lucchetti; Parameshwaran Ramakrishnan; Klaus Baumann; Eunmi Lee; Eckhard Frick; Arndt Büssing; Nada A Alyousefi; Azimatul Karimah; Esther Schouten; Inga Wermuth; René Hefti; Rocío de Diego-Cordero; Maria Cecilia Menegatti-Chequini; Niels Christian Hvidt
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.