Danny Mou1, Claire E E de Vries2, Nena Pater3, Lotte Poulsen4, Dennis J S Makarawung5, Marinus J Wiezer5, Ruben N van Veen6, Maarten M Hoogbergen7, Jens A Sorensen8, Anne F Klassen9, Andrea L Pusic2, Ali Tavakkoli2. 1. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francs St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA. Dmou2@partners.org. 2. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francs St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 3. Maastricht University Medical School, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 5. Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Surgery, OLVG West, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 9. Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Post-operative changes in eating behavior, eating-related distress and eating-related symptoms play an important role in the lives of bariatric surgery patients. However, there are no studies that assess these outcomes using a specifically designed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. We use our newly developed and validated scales as part of the well-established BODY-Q PROMs to compare laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients (LRYGB). METHODS: We analyzed data from an international multi-center prospective cohort study of patients over 18 who underwent bariatric surgery. We used multivariable linear regression models to assess the difference between LRYGB and LSG for the new BODY-Q scales, which include eating behavior, eating-related distress and eating-related symptoms. All analyses were corrected for significant confounding variables. RESULTS: Out of 1420 patients, 920 underwent LRYGB and 500 underwent LSG. The LRYGB group had a higher percentage total weight loss (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in eating behavior (e.g., stop eating before feeling full, avoiding unhealthy snacks, etc.) or eating-related distress (e.g., feeling ashamed or out of control after eating). Patients who underwent LSG scored significantly better on the post-prandial eating-related symptoms scale (e.g., vomiting, reflux; p < 0.001). Symptoms more prevalent in the LRYGB patients were related to dumping syndrome whereas symptoms more prevalent in LSG patients were related to reflux. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent LRYGB had a significantly better weight loss after surgery, but they scored worse on post-prandial symptoms in comparison to LSG patients. This information may be relevant for patients in the pre-operative counseling setting, as it may influence their decision for surgical procedure selection.
BACKGROUND: Post-operative changes in eating behavior, eating-related distress and eating-related symptoms play an important role in the lives of bariatric surgery patients. However, there are no studies that assess these outcomes using a specifically designed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. We use our newly developed and validated scales as part of the well-established BODY-Q PROMs to compare laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients (LRYGB). METHODS: We analyzed data from an international multi-center prospective cohort study of patients over 18 who underwent bariatric surgery. We used multivariable linear regression models to assess the difference between LRYGB and LSG for the new BODY-Q scales, which include eating behavior, eating-related distress and eating-related symptoms. All analyses were corrected for significant confounding variables. RESULTS: Out of 1420 patients, 920 underwent LRYGB and 500 underwent LSG. The LRYGB group had a higher percentage total weight loss (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in eating behavior (e.g., stop eating before feeling full, avoiding unhealthy snacks, etc.) or eating-related distress (e.g., feeling ashamed or out of control after eating). Patients who underwent LSG scored significantly better on the post-prandial eating-related symptoms scale (e.g., vomiting, reflux; p < 0.001). Symptoms more prevalent in the LRYGB patients were related to dumping syndrome whereas symptoms more prevalent in LSG patients were related to reflux. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent LRYGB had a significantly better weight loss after surgery, but they scored worse on post-prandial symptoms in comparison to LSG patients. This information may be relevant for patients in the pre-operative counseling setting, as it may influence their decision for surgical procedure selection.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bariatric surgery; Eating behavior; Eating symptoms; Patient-reported outcome measures; Quality of life
Authors: Philip R Schauer; Deepak L Bhatt; John P Kirwan; Kathy Wolski; Ali Aminian; Stacy A Brethauer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Rishi P Singh; Claire E Pothier; Steven E Nissen; Sangeeta R Kashyap Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Farima Dalaei; Claire E E de Vries; Lotte Poulsen; Manraj N Kaur; André Pfob; Danny Mou; Amalie L Jacobsen; Jussi P Repo; Rosa Salzillo; Jakub Opyrchal; Anne F Klassen; Jens Ahm Sørensen; Andrea L Pusic Journal: Clin Obes Date: 2022-05-25