M Fellmann1, L Balssa2, E Clément3, P Frey4, A Frontczak3, S Bernardini2, É Chabannes2, G Guichard2, H Bittard3, F Kleinclauss3. 1. Service d'urologie, andrologie et transplantation rénale, CHRU de Besançon, 3, boulevard Fleming, 25000 Besançon cedex, France; Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France. Electronic address: mariefellmann@hotmail.fr. 2. Service d'urologie, andrologie et transplantation rénale, CHRU de Besançon, 3, boulevard Fleming, 25000 Besançon cedex, France. 3. Service d'urologie, andrologie et transplantation rénale, CHRU de Besançon, 3, boulevard Fleming, 25000 Besançon cedex, France; Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France. 4. Service de cardiologie, CHR de Annecy, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze early, late complications and outcomes following expended criteria donors (ECD) kidney transplantation compared to standard donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including 470 patients who received a kidney transplant between 2005 and 2016. Expended criteria donors were defined following the United Network of Organ Sharing criteria. In each group, length of stay, delayed graft function, surgical site infection, acute rejection, surgical complications by type and according to Clavien and Dindo classification were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analysis. The impact of ECD transplant on transplant and patient survival was assessed using a Cox proportional regression model. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety seven (41.9%) patients received ECD kidney. The mean follow-up was 61,4 months (22.4-93.89). Patients with ECD transplant presented more delayed graft function (HR=2.1 (1.1-3.68), P=0.008) but the rate of complications including surgical complications was not different. Patients and transplant survival were decreased in ECD transplant group (P=0.005 et 0.001 respectively). In multivariate analysis ECD kidney was an independent factor only associated with decreased transplant survival (HR=1.81 (1.1-2.98), P=0.029) but not with patient survival. CONCLUSION: ECD kidney transplantation was not associated with increased postoperative complications but a higher rate of delayed graft function. Nevertheless, it was associated with a decreased transplant survival. The use of pulsatile perfusion machine for explanted criteria transplant should be evaluated to improve these results.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze early, late complications and outcomes following expended criteria donors (ECD) kidney transplantation compared to standard donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including 470 patients who received a kidney transplant between 2005 and 2016. Expended criteria donors were defined following the United Network of Organ Sharing criteria. In each group, length of stay, delayed graft function, surgical site infection, acute rejection, surgical complications by type and according to Clavien and Dindo classification were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analysis. The impact of ECD transplant on transplant and patient survival was assessed using a Cox proportional regression model. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety seven (41.9%) patients received ECD kidney. The mean follow-up was 61,4 months (22.4-93.89). Patients with ECD transplant presented more delayed graft function (HR=2.1 (1.1-3.68), P=0.008) but the rate of complications including surgical complications was not different. Patients and transplant survival were decreased in ECD transplant group (P=0.005 et 0.001 respectively). In multivariate analysis ECD kidney was an independent factor only associated with decreased transplant survival (HR=1.81 (1.1-2.98), P=0.029) but not with patient survival. CONCLUSION: ECD kidney transplantation was not associated with increased postoperative complications but a higher rate of delayed graft function. Nevertheless, it was associated with a decreased transplant survival. The use of pulsatile perfusion machine for explanted criteria transplant should be evaluated to improve these results.