| Literature DB >> 32814567 |
Tania García-Maceira1, Fé I García-Maceira2, José A González-Reyes3, Elier Paz-Rojas2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), is the most widely used and reliable clinical routine method for the detection of important protein markers in healthcare. Improving ELISAs is crucial for detecting biomolecules relates to health disorders and facilitating diagnosis at the early diseases stages. Several methods have been developed to improve the ELISA sensitivity through immobilization of antibodies on the microtiter plates. We have developed a highly sensitive ELISA strategy based on the preparation of acetylated chitosan surfaces in order to improve the antibodies orientation.Entities:
Keywords: Antibody orientation; Chitin binding domain; Chitosan surface; ELISA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32814567 PMCID: PMC7437170 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-020-00640-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Fig. 1Analysis of His6-c-myc-GST-IL8h recombinant protein obtained in E. coli. In panel a we show 10% acrylamide gel electrophoresis and Coomassie blue staining. Lanes: 1. Molecular weight pattern (Gene On); 2. His6-c-myc-GST-human IL8 (1 μg). The arrow indicates the analyzed protein with the expected MW. In panel b we show the 4PL sigmoidal curve of the ELISA developed using anti-human IL8 or anti-c-myc 9E10 as capture antibody and both revealed using anti- human IL8 biotin. The error bars correspond to three replicates of each concentration of His6-c-myc GST IL8h protein. EC50 represents the analyte concentration capable of generating half of the maximum signal obtained in the test in the linear range of the curve. LOD is the minimum amount of analyte detected and LOQ represents the minimum amount of analyte that can be quantified by the test
Fig. 2Analysis of the anti c-myc-ChBD antibody expressed in mammalian cells. Panel a shows 10% acrylamide gel electrophoresis and Coomassie blue staining. Lanes: 1. anti c-myc- ChBD with β Mercaptoethanol (2 μg); 2. Molecular weight pattern. Panel b shows the ELISA detection of anti-c-myc-ChBD antibody activity compared to the antibody purified from hybridoma 9E10. In panel c cytometry of chitin-coated magnetic particles using the specific anti-c-myc-ChBD antibody is depicted. The negative cytometry control for which we used the anti-c-myc antibody is represented in black; particles tagged with the recombinant anti-c-myc-ChBD antibody are represented in red
Fig. 3ELISA conditions establishment in acetylated chitosan surfaces. Panel a: Comparison of acetylated chitosan surfaces: anti-c-myc-ChBD antibody binding ELISA on surfaces prepared with chitosan at different degrees of deacetylation. Panel b: anti-c-myc-ChBD binding curve to chitin modified surfaces as a negative control anti c-myc 9E10. Panel c: Binding curves of anti-c-myc-ChBD to chitin surface in different buffers. Panel d: anti-c-myc-ChBD binding curve to chitin at 37 °C and using different incubation times. All charts show error bars of 3 replicas for each concentration
Fig. 4Comparative ELISA of human c-myc-GST-IL8 in standard and chitin-treated plates. Panel a: 4PL sigmoidal curves on two different surfaces developed ELISAs. Concentration range used was 0.39–200 ng/mL. The results correspond to three replicates for each concentration. The negative control included 10 replicas. Panel b: bar diagram of LOD and the resulting LOQ of five ELISAs on each surface. The value of p was determined using the GraphPad Prism software
Comparison of the obtained results for standard and acetylated chitosan surfaces
| High binding surfaces | Chitosan acetylated surfaces | |
|---|---|---|
| LOD (ng/ml) | 10.38 ± 1.58 | 1.74 ± 0.23 |
| LOQ (ng/ml) | 12.50 ± 1.41 | 2.40 ± 0.34 |
| %CV Intra-assay | 0.27–6.05 | 0.17–4.90 |
| %CV Inter-assay | 0.77–8.35 | 1.37–6.59 |
Fig. 5Detection of His6-c-myc-GST-IL8h protein in plates prepared with chitin and using different concentrations of a biological sample. Panel a: Bar graph of the resulting ELISA concentration when the protein to be analyzed was added at final concentrations of 10 ng/mL b: Bar graph of the resulting ELISA concentration when the protein to be analyzed was added at final concentrations of 100 ng/mL
ELISA analyte recovery in different media compared to the control
| Sample | Spiked level (ng/ml) | ELISA results (ng/ml) | %Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human Plasma | 10 | 9.54 | 92.54 |
| 100 | 112.11 | 109.73 | |
| Human Serum | 10 | 7.59 | 73.69 |
| 100 | 108.00 | 105.70 | |
| RPMI medium (10% FBS Supplemented) | 10 | 11.66 | 113.15 |
| 100 | 95.53 | 93.50 |
Fig. 6Schematic illustration of a comparative ELISA developed in standard or chitosan acetylated microplates