Literature DB >> 32814443

Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction in Patients with Radiation-Induced Ureteral Strictures: Experience from the Collaborative of Reconstructive Robotic Ureteral Surgery.

Aeen M Asghar1, Ziho Lee1, Randall A Lee1, Jeremy Slawin2, Nathan Cheng3, Helaine Koster3, David M Strauss1, Matthew Lee1, Rohit Reddy1, Alice Drain2, Tenzin Lama-Tamang3, Min S Jun2, Michael J Metro1, Mutahar Ahmed3, Michael Stifelman3, Lee Zhao2, Daniel D Eun1.   

Abstract

Objectives: Management of radiation-induced ureteral stricture (RIUS) is complex, requiring chronic drainage or morbid definitive open reconstruction. Herein, we report our multi-institutional comprehensive experience with robotic ureteral reconstruction (RUR) in patients with RIUSs. Patients and
Methods: In a retrospective review of our multi-institutional RUR database between January 2013 and January 2020, we identified patients with RIUSs. Five major reconstruction techniques were utilized: end-to-end (anastomosing the bladder to the transected ureter) and side-to-side (anastomosing the bladder to an anterior ureterotomy proximal to the stricture without ureteral transection) ureteral reimplantation, buccal or appendiceal mucosa graft ureteroplasty, appendiceal bypass graft, and ileal ureter interposition. When necessary, adjunctive procedures were performed for mobility (i.e., psoas hitch) and improved vascularity (i.e., omental wrap). Outcomes of surgery were determined by the absence of flank pain (clinical success) and absence of obstruction on imaging (radiological success).
Results: A total of 32 patients with 35 ureteral units underwent RUR with a median stricture length of 2.5 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 2-5.5). End-to-end and side-to-side reimplantation techniques were performed in 21 (60.0%) and 8 (22.9%) RUR cases, respectively, while 4 (11.4%) underwent an appendiceal procedure. One patient (2.9%) required buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty, while another needed an ileal ureter interposition. The median operative time was 215 minutes (IQR 177-281), estimated blood loss was 100 mL (IQR 50-150), and length of stay was 2 days (IQR 1-3). One patient required repair of a small bowel leak. Another patient died from a major cardiac event and was excluded from follow-up calculations. At a median follow-up of 13 months (IQR 9-22), 30 ureteral units (88.2%) were clinically and radiologically effective.
Conclusion: RUR can be performed in patients with RIUSs with excellent outcomes. Surgeons must be prepared to perform adjunctive procedures for mobility and improved vascularity due to poor tissue quality. Repeat procedures for RIUSs heighten the risk of necrosis and failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  radiation; radiation induced ureteral stricture; robotic surgery; robotic ureteral reconstruction; ureter; ureteral stricture

Year:  2020        PMID: 32814443     DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  2 in total

1.  A systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries.

Authors:  Matthew D Grimes; Morgan E Schubbe; Bradley A Erickson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-01

2.  Robotic ureteroplasty with appendiceal onlay flap: an update on the outcomes of 18-month follow-up.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Zhihua Li; Shubo Fan; Shengwei Xiong; Changwei Yuan; Chang Meng; Jun Zhang; Xiaowei Zhang; Peng Zhang; Mingfei Ji; Jie Chen; Kunlin Yang; Xuesong Li
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.