Heather Lyu1,2, Caitlin Manca2, Casey McGrath2, Jennifer Beloff2, Nina Plaks3, Anatoly Postilnik3, Amanda Borchers3, Nicasio Diaz3, Sean McGovern3, Joaquim Havens1,2, Allen Kachalia4, Adam Landman1,3,5. 1. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 2. Department of Quality and Safety, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 3. Partners HealthCare, Somerville, Massachusetts, United States. 4. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 5. Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: An electronic pathway for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) was built and implemented on top of the electronic health record. The aims of this study are to describe the development of the electronic pathway and to report early outcomes. METHODS: The electronic SBO pathway was designed and implemented at a single institution. All patients admitted to a surgical service with a diagnosis of adhesive SBO were enrolled. Outcomes were compared across three time periods: (1) patients not placed on either pathway from September 2013 through December 2014, (2) patients enrolled in the paper pathway from January 2017 through January 2018, and (3) patients enrolled in the electronic pathway from March through October 2018. The electronic SBO pathway pulls real-time data from the electronic health record to prepopulate the evidence-based algorithm. Outcomes measured included length of stay (LOS), time to surgery, readmission, surgery, and need for bowel resection. Comparative analyses were completed with Pearson's chi-squared, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: There were 46 patients enrolled in the electronic pathway compared with 93 patients on the paper pathway, and 101 nonpathway patients. Median LOS was lower in both pathway cohorts compared with those not on either pathway (3 days [range 1-11] vs. 3 days [range 1-27] vs. 4 days [range 1-13], p = 0.04). Rates of readmission, surgery, time to surgery, and bowel resection were not significantly different across the three groups. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to implement and utilize an electronic, evidence-based clinical pathway for adhesive SBOs. Use of the electronic and paper pathways was associated with decreased hospital LOS for patients with adhesive SBOs. Thieme. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: An electronic pathway for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) was built and implemented on top of the electronic health record. The aims of this study are to describe the development of the electronic pathway and to report early outcomes. METHODS: The electronic SBO pathway was designed and implemented at a single institution. All patients admitted to a surgical service with a diagnosis of adhesive SBO were enrolled. Outcomes were compared across three time periods: (1) patients not placed on either pathway from September 2013 through December 2014, (2) patients enrolled in the paper pathway from January 2017 through January 2018, and (3) patients enrolled in the electronic pathway from March through October 2018. The electronic SBO pathway pulls real-time data from the electronic health record to prepopulate the evidence-based algorithm. Outcomes measured included length of stay (LOS), time to surgery, readmission, surgery, and need for bowel resection. Comparative analyses were completed with Pearson's chi-squared, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: There were 46 patients enrolled in the electronic pathway compared with 93 patients on the paper pathway, and 101 nonpathway patients. Median LOS was lower in both pathway cohorts compared with those not on either pathway (3 days [range 1-11] vs. 3 days [range 1-27] vs. 4 days [range 1-13], p = 0.04). Rates of readmission, surgery, time to surgery, and bowel resection were not significantly different across the three groups. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to implement and utilize an electronic, evidence-based clinical pathway for adhesive SBOs. Use of the electronic and paper pathways was associated with decreased hospital LOS for patients with adhesive SBOs. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Authors: Richard T Griffey; Helen G Lo; Elisabeth Burdick; Carol Keohane; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jonathan S Austrian; Frank Volpicelli; Simon Jones; Mitchell A Bernstein; Jane Padikkala; Ashley Bagheri; Saul Blecker Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Heather G Lyu; Manuel Castillo-Angeles; Melanie Bruno; Zara Cooper; Deepika Nehra; Stephanie L Nitzschke; Reza Askari; Edward Kelly; Naomi Shimizu; Robert Riviello; Ali Salim; Joaquim M Havens Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Navdeep Sahota; Rob Lloyd; Anita Ramakrishna; Jean A Mackay; Jeanette C Prorok; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Brian J Hemens; Anne Holbrook; Marita Tonkin; Jean A Mackay; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 7.327