Joyce E P Brouns1, Patricia Y W Dankers1. 1. Eindhoven University of Technology, Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Het Kranenveld 14, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Much effort has been made in the development of biomaterials that synthetically mimic the dynamics of the natural extracellular matrix in tissues. Most of these biomaterials specifically interact with cells, but lack the ability to adapt and truly communicate with the cellular environment. Communication between biomaterials and cells is achieved by the development of various materials with enzyme-responsive moieties in order to respond to cellular cues. In this perspective, we discuss different enzyme-responsive systems, from surfaces to supramolecular assemblies. Additionally, we highlight their further prospects in order to create, inspired by nature, fully autonomous adaptive biomaterials that display dynamic reciprocal behavior. This Perspective shows new strategies for the development of biomaterials that may find broad utility in regenerative medicine applications, from scaffolds for tissue engineering to systems for controlled drug delivery.
Much effort has been made in the development of biomaterials that synthetically mimic the dynamics of the natural extracellular matrix in tissues. Most of these biomaterials specifically interact with cells, but lack the ability to adapt and truly communicate with the cellular environment. Communication between biomaterials and cells is achieved by the development of various materials with enzyme-responsive moieties in order to respond to cellular cues. In this perspective, we discuss different enzyme-responsive systems, from surfaces to supramolecular assemblies. Additionally, we highlight their further prospects in order to create, inspired by nature, fully autonomous adaptive biomaterials that display dynamic reciprocal behavior. This Perspective shows new strategies for the development of biomaterials that may find broad utility in regenerative medicine applications, from scaffolds for tissue engineering to systems for controlled drug delivery.
In the regenerative medicine
field, synthetic biomaterials are
being developed that interface with biology, that is, with cells and
tissue. These biomaterials are mostly static, providing support to
the cellular environment but not exposing dynamic interactions with
the cells.[1−4] In order to regenerate the body, research has shifted to biomaterials
that provide more than only architectural structure by incorporating
functional groups, such as bioactive molecules that can be delivered
to the cells to provoke cellular reactions.[5−11] A source of inspiration is the extracellular matrix (ECM), which
is the material that surrounds the cells in our tissues.[12−14] This specialized biological material is composed of thousands of
different molecules held together via noncovalent, supramolecular
interactions and displays a life-like behavior by using dynamic reciprocity
(DR).[15−17] DR refers to the bidirectional interaction between
cells and their ECM.[18]
Dynamic
Reciprocity in the Natural ECM
DR between the ECM and the
cell is very important in many processes,
such as tissue morphogenesis, angiogenesis, cancer, and wound healing.[19,20] During tissue development, the tissue is continuously being remodeled
by changes in the degradation and structural organization of the ECM,
regulating the mechanical properties of the tissue.[21] These changes in the ECM in its turn controls the survival,
migration, proliferation, and differentiation of cells.[22] During these tissue remodeling processes, ECM-degrading
enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are very important
and their activity is highly regulated both temporally and spatially.[23] Normally, the activity of MMPs is low. However,
when the tissue is diseased or inflamed, they become highly active.[24] During homeostasis, the activity between MMPs
and their inhibitors, tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs),
is regulated.[25] However, under pathophysiological
conditions, the balance between MMP activity and TIMP activity can
be shifted, and excessive MMP activity can cause maladaptive changes
to the tissue architecture.[26] This can
eventually lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation and growth of the
tissue, and hence, the development of a cancerous microenvironment
and tumor growth. Another process in which DR is very important is
in the wound-healing process. Normally, the wound-healing process
is coordinated with a series of molecular, cellular, and biomechanical
events in order to restore the function of the damaged tissue.[27] During wound healing, DR is very important because
it allows for the intense communication between cells and their microenvironment,
the ECM. Through the interactions with the ECM, the cells differentiate,
proliferate, migrate, or survive. The interaction between the ECM
and the cells is equally important for the regulation of the mechanical
properties of the tissue, such as changes in stiffness (e.g., stress-stiffening)
and regulation of the (visco)elasticity of tissues. Importantly, mechanical
signals from the ECM have shown to regulate the (stem) cell characteristics
and the commitment of cells to a certain lineage.[28] Besides that, DR allows for the cells to reorientate in
the desired architecture needed for proper tissue repair. In some
cases, for example, diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression, wounds
can fail to recover and chronic wounds can appear.[18] During these wound repairing processes, DR ensures the
active synthesis and deposition of ECM molecules, leading to new,
possibly nonfunctional tissue. However, its inability to synthesize
functional tissue can be caused by the disruption of normal interactions
between the cells and their ECM, which can delay the healing of the
tissue and can lead to the formation of chronic wounds. Research has
shown that the mechanical environment at the wound site is important
for the quality of wound healing, and chronic wounds often occur when
there is mechanical stress in the tissue.[29] In order to create biomaterials that control, for example, wound-healing
processes and tissue development, a biomaterial should be created
that exploit DR like the natural ECM, allowing the application of
these biomaterials for in situ tissue engineering.[30−32]
Dynamic Reciprocity in Model Systems
Although many
researchers agree that it is important to mimic the
DR of the natural system, little research has been performed on the
exploration of DR in synthetic systems. There are research groups
that focus on the understanding of DR of natural systems, in order
to understand to process of disease development. For example, Bissell
and co-workers describe the importance to engineer 3D models in order
to understand cancer development and to predict the outcome of some
treatments.[33] Other groups focus on the
development of stimuli-responsive biomaterials, in order to mimic
the DR between cells and the ECM. Stimuli-responsive materials are
smart materials that can change their properties in response to changes
in biological, physical, and chemical conditions such as temperature,
pH, ionic strength, light, redox potential, and small (bio)molecules.[34−37] Nowadays, it is still challenging to control the cellular behavior
on biomaterial scaffolds.[38−42] Cells cultured on a biomaterial can sense the mechanical and chemical
properties of the scaffold and respond to these properties, by adapting
for example their shape or morphology.[43] However, in many biomaterials currently being developed, this is
a one-way response in which the cells adapt to the biomaterial, but
the biomaterial does not adapt to the cellular response. A dynamic
smart biomaterial should be able to adapt to cellular cues; for example
the secretion of growth factors in response to enzyme activity in
order to mimic the DR in the natural tissue (Figure A).[44−48] Smart biomaterials are therefore good candidates to modulate the
complex and dynamic cell-biomaterial interactions. This is proposed
to be done by incorporating functional groups that modulate the surface
and/or bulk properties, thereby controlling the cellular behavior
such as adhesion, growth, and migration and responding to cellular
cues such as secretion of small (bio)molecules, enzymes, and proteins.[46] Besides that, the dynamic interactions within
the biomaterial are also important, as the natural ECM continuously
assembles and disassembles upon environmental cues (Figure B).
Figure 1
Schematic representations
of (A) dynamic reciprocity between a
cell and a biomaterial and (B) dynamic reciprocity in a dynamic, supramolecular
material.
Schematic representations
of (A) dynamic reciprocity between a
cell and a biomaterial and (B) dynamic reciprocity in a dynamic, supramolecular
material.
Cell–Biomaterial
Interactions: One-Way,
Bidirectional, and Continuous Responses
In general, different
kinds of cell–biomaterial interactions can be distinguished.
When the cell excretes bioactive molecules that will not provoke any
changes to the biomaterial architecture (Figure A), then the biomaterial exhibits an one-way
biomaterial response. These biomaterials are often used as a scaffold
material to provide solely mechanical support. Nowadays, more advanced
biomaterials are being developed that can provoke cellular reactions
and stimulate a bidirectional biomaterial response (Figure B). Those biomaterials consist
of bioactive molecules that are released upon a specific cue, which
can be derived from the cell itself. The released cue can either be
up taken by the cell or be released in the environment. Although these
biomaterials are more dynamic, they often consists of one cycle in
which all the bioactivity is consumed. An ideal biomaterial controls
multiple cycles of bioactivity, in which the biomaterial releases
active molecules when a cellular cue is applied. This active molecule
in its turn will provoke a cellular reaction, which can for example
inhibit the release of the cellular cue (Figure C). In this way, the DR of the natural systems
is mimicked.
Figure 2
(A) One-way biomaterial response. The cell binds to the
material
(1) whereby cellular molecules are released (2). Released molecules
have no effect on the biomaterial; however, the cell can, for example,
differentiate upon binding to the material (3). (B) Bidirectional
biomaterial response. The cell binds to the material (1) and the cell
releases molecules (2) that will create a response to the biomaterial
(3); it will release all its bioactive molecules (4). These molecules
can be internalized in the cell or released into the environment (5).
(C) Continuous biomaterial response. The cell binds to the material
(1) and the cell releases molecules (2) that will create a response
to the biomaterial (3); it will release some of its bioactive molecules
(4). These molecules can be internalized in the cell (5). The bioactive
molecules will in their turn inhibit the released molecules from the
cell (6). This process can be repeated multiple times.
(A) One-way biomaterial response. The cell binds to the
material
(1) whereby cellular molecules are released (2). Released molecules
have no effect on the biomaterial; however, the cell can, for example,
differentiate upon binding to the material (3). (B) Bidirectional
biomaterial response. The cell binds to the material (1) and the cell
releases molecules (2) that will create a response to the biomaterial
(3); it will release all its bioactive molecules (4). These molecules
can be internalized in the cell or released into the environment (5).
(C) Continuous biomaterial response. The cell binds to the material
(1) and the cell releases molecules (2) that will create a response
to the biomaterial (3); it will release some of its bioactive molecules
(4). These molecules can be internalized in the cell (5). The bioactive
molecules will in their turn inhibit the released molecules from the
cell (6). This process can be repeated multiple times.This Perspective aims to highlight recent studies on biomaterial
development, from one-way biomaterial responses to continuous biomaterials.
Although mechanics play an important role in dynamic reciprocity,
this perspective will focus on biochemical processes rather than biomechanical
processes. We focus on biomaterials that are regulated by enzymatic
processes, as enzymes are very important in the DR of healthy tissue
development, and also play a role in impaired tissue homeostasis.
As mentioned above, ECM-degrading enzymes are highly active during
tissue remodeling and the activity of the enzymes is highly regulated.
This is important not only to remain tissue homeostasis, but also
in processes such as angiogenesis, embryogenesis, and morphogenesis.
Smart Biomaterials Based on Enzyme-Responsive
Systems
Enzyme-responsive biomaterials to regulate enzyme
activity in tissue
development are useful for the regenerative medicine and tissue engineering
field. Enzymes are highly selective macromolecular globular proteins
that can catalyze a rate of biochemical reactions.[49,50,35] Enzymes can work under mild conditions,
that is, low temperatures, pH 5–8, and an aqueous environment.[51−53] Due to their high specificity and activity, these are extensively
studied in responsive hydrogel systems.[54−59] Enzyme-responsive biomaterials are developed based on three different
mechanisms: (1) Enzyme-responsive surfaces,[60] in which a small molecule or polymer is cleaved from the surface
upon cellular cues; (2) Hydrogel systems with enzyme-cleavable bonds
or cross-links;[62−64] (3) Enzyme-responsive supramolecular assemblies,[61] in which a non-self-assembling precursor self-assembles
after enzymatic cues.
Enzyme Responsive Surfaces
One-Way Surfaces Responses
Enzyme-responsive
surfaces have been of great interest because of the ability to locally
release a biological molecule or diagnostic agent to a target tissue
or to measure and control the activity of cells on a biomedical surface.[26,65,66] In addition, the surface can
change its chemical or mechanical properties upon enzymatic cues,
for example, changing from adhesive to nonadhesive surfaces or changing
its redox properties.[35] Of the latter,
Mrksich and co-workers designed a strategy in which self-assembled
monolayers could convert enzymatic activities to electrical signals
(Figure A).[67] Self-assembling monolayers (SAM) that consist
out of an alkanethiolate terminated by either tri(ethylene glycol)
or 4-hydroxyphenyl valerate moieties were incubated with the enzyme
cutinase. The cutinase hydrolyzed the redox-inactive 4-hydroxyphenyl
to the redox active hydroquinone (Figure B). When exposed to iron(III) chloride, the
hydroquinone was efficiently converted to benzoquinone groups, which
could produce an electrical signal. This work is a great example of
both a one-way biomaterial response, namely, the hydrolyzation of
the 4-hydroxyphenyl valerate to a hydroquinone and a bidirectional
response, namely, the oxidation and reduction of the hydroquinone
to a benzoquinone and vice versa, and can be used as a system to study
enzymatic activity or develop cell-based sensors. Cell-based sensing
is an alternative to biosensing techniques, in which biomolecular
markers are measured in bodily fluids and tissues.[68] Cell-based sensing has an advantage over biosensing as
it has high sensitivity to a broad range of chemically active substances
and it can identify very low concentrations of environmental cues.[69]
Figure 3
(A) An enzyme-responsive molecule is immobilized to a
self-assembled
monolayer. An enzyme (cutinase) converts the substrate into a redox-active
molecule. The molecule can be oxidized ([O]), and this is reversible
by reduction ([R]). (B) Self-assembled monolayer with 4-hydroxphenyl
valerate as a substrate. When the enzyme cutinase is applied, the
4-hydroxphenyl valerate is hydrolyzed to a hydroquinone. The hydroquinone
can be oxidized ([O]) to yield a benzoquinone and this process can
be reversed by reduction ([R]). Reprinted with permission from ref (67). Copyright 2003 Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
(A) An enzyme-responsive molecule is immobilized to a
self-assembled
monolayer. An enzyme (cutinase) converts the substrate into a redox-active
molecule. The molecule can be oxidized ([O]), and this is reversible
by reduction ([R]). (B) Self-assembled monolayer with 4-hydroxphenyl
valerate as a substrate. When the enzyme cutinase is applied, the
4-hydroxphenyl valerate is hydrolyzed to a hydroquinone. The hydroquinone
can be oxidized ([O]) to yield a benzoquinone and this process can
be reversed by reduction ([R]). Reprinted with permission from ref (67). Copyright 2003 Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Bidirectional Surface Responses
Besides
cell-based sensing, enzyme-responsive surfaces are also used
as local drug delivery systems. These systems are advantageous over
conventional drug administration methods, such as intravenous or oral
administration, because they have less side effects, require little
dosages and less administration of the drug to stimulate a therapeutic
effect.[70] The delivery of drugs in a local
and specific way has been explored by a great amount of research and
has made a seminal impact to the drug delivery field.[71,72] Drug delivery from a scaffold has been used for the regeneration
of cartilage tissue,[73,74] heart tissue,[75,76] and abdominal tissue.[77,78] In the work of Blasi
et al., an enzyme-responsive surface was developed for the use of
biotin–streptavidin binding for the local delivery of chemotherapeutic
drugs (Figure ).[34] An enzyme-cleavable biotinylated peptide was
synthesized and reacted on a biotinylated glass substrate that was
covered with streptavidin. This biotinylated enzyme-cleavable peptide
was then reacted with streptavidin. At the end, the functionalized
glass substrates were incubated with functional molecules such as
FITC-labeled antihumanCD4MAbs and doxorubicin, a chemotherapeutic
drug, to create a reactive surface. When exposed to Cathepsin D, the
enzyme-cleavable peptide is cleaved and the attached biomolecules
are released. In this way, a reactive surface is created which could
release multiple biological cues, which could be applied as a local
drug delivery system. However, this is a clear example of a bidirectional
biomaterial response, in which a cellular cue (enzyme) causes a reaction
to the biomaterial (release of biomolecules), which in its turn has
a biologic effect. However, all the bioactivity is consumed once the
biomaterial is exposed to the enzyme. In the ideal case, the biomolecules
are released in a sustained fashion, so that the biomaterial stays
bioactive for a longer period of time and has a longer therapeutic
effect.
Figure 4
An enzyme-responsive multifunctional surface for the release of
biomolecules was created as follows: (A) A glass substrate (B) was
silanized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES); (C) the biotinylated
substrate is then modified with sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-biotin and further
functionalized with streptavidin; (D) Streptavidin was modified with
enzyme-cleavable biotinylated peptides (H-Lys(biotinyl)-Pro-Ile-Ser-Phe-Phe-Arg-Leu-Gly-Lys(byotinil)-OH);
(E) and a layer of streptavidin was deposited. (F) The layers were
modified with either biotinylated depolymerized chitosan and FITC-labeled
antihuman CD4MAbs or biotinylated depolymerized chitosan and doxorubicin
(DOX). When the enzyme Cathepsin D was applied, the enzyme-cleavable
peptide was cleaved and either the FITC-labeled antihuman CD4MAbs
or the doxorubicin are released. Reprinted with permission from Mortato,
M.; Argentiere, S.; De Gregorio, G.L.; Gigli, G.; Blasi, L. Enzyme-Responsive
Multifunctional Surfaces for Controlled Uptake/Release of (Bio)Molecules. Colloid Surf. B2014, 123,
pp 89–95. Copyright 2014 Elsevier.
An enzyme-responsive multifunctional surface for the release of
biomolecules was created as follows: (A) A glass substrate (B) was
silanized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES); (C) the biotinylated
substrate is then modified with sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-biotin and further
functionalized with streptavidin; (D) Streptavidin was modified with
enzyme-cleavable biotinylated peptides (H-Lys(biotinyl)-Pro-Ile-Ser-Phe-Phe-Arg-Leu-Gly-Lys(byotinil)-OH);
(E) and a layer of streptavidin was deposited. (F) The layers were
modified with either biotinylated depolymerized chitosan and FITC-labeled
antihumanCD4MAbs or biotinylated depolymerized chitosan and doxorubicin
(DOX). When the enzyme Cathepsin D was applied, the enzyme-cleavable
peptide was cleaved and either the FITC-labeled antihumanCD4MAbs
or the doxorubicin are released. Reprinted with permission from Mortato,
M.; Argentiere, S.; De Gregorio, G.L.; Gigli, G.; Blasi, L. Enzyme-Responsive
Multifunctional Surfaces for Controlled Uptake/Release of (Bio)Molecules. Colloid Surf. B2014, 123,
pp 89–95. Copyright 2014 Elsevier.In a study of Roberts et al., a surface was developed that could
change the adhesion of cells and initiate differentiation, by the
immobilization of peptides on the surface (Figure ).[79] These peptides
are susceptible to the enzyme elastase, which cleaves the blocking
group of the RGD-peptide, allowing cells to adhere to the surface.
In this way, a switch is created. Moreover, this study showed mesenchymal
stem cells (MSCs) can differentiate into osteoblast after adherence
on the surface, depending on the adhesion points.
Figure 5
(A) An enzyme-cleavable
surface is developed by salinization of
glass substrates with (3-glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane and reacted
with a diamine-functionalized polyethylene glycol (PEG). Then, SPPS
was used to functionalize the surface with a peptide chain (D- or
E-GRAA). One was modified with a PEG blocking group (PEG-AARGD-) and
the other one with a FMOC-blocking group (FMOC-AARGD-). (B) The surface
was “OFF”, meaning the blocking group was present and
the RGD sequence shielded for the cells. When the enzyme elastase
was added, the peptide sequence was cleaved between the alanine–alanine,
thereby removing the blocking group. (C) Schematic representation
of the concept. When the blocking group (green hexagonal) was present,
the cells could not adhere that well. When the enzyme elastase was
added, the blocking group was removed and the cells adhered and differentiated.
Reprinted with permission from ref (79). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
(A) An enzyme-cleavable
surface is developed by salinization of
glass substrates with (3-glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane and reacted
with a diamine-functionalized polyethylene glycol (PEG). Then, SPPS
was used to functionalize the surface with a peptide chain (D- or
E-GRAA). One was modified with a PEG blocking group (PEG-AARGD-) and
the other one with a FMOC-blocking group (FMOC-AARGD-). (B) The surface
was “OFF”, meaning the blocking group was present and
the RGD sequence shielded for the cells. When the enzyme elastase
was added, the peptide sequence was cleaved between the alanine–alanine,
thereby removing the blocking group. (C) Schematic representation
of the concept. When the blocking group (green hexagonal) was present,
the cells could not adhere that well. When the enzyme elastase was
added, the blocking group was removed and the cells adhered and differentiated.
Reprinted with permission from ref (79). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.Other groups focus on the control of bioinert versus
bioactive
surfaces using enzyme-responsiveness.[80] For example, enzymatic cues can release functional molecules from
the surface that control cell or bacterial growth. Bacterial colonization
on surfaces can cause severe infections and illnesses, and hence,
it is very important to minimize the bacterial growth on a surface.[81−83] Liu and co-workers created an enzyme-responsive substrate that releases
silver (Ag) ions from the surface upon enzyme cleavage for an antibacterial
effect (Figure ).[84] First, they synthesized chitosan-silver nanocomposites
and created an antibacterial coating using a layer-by-layer self-assembling
method with hyaluronic acid (HA). Then, the Ag-ions were rapidly released
from the substrate when exposed to the enzyme hyaluronidase (HAase),
which showed an inhibitory effect on the growth S.
aureus and E. coli.
This study shows the antibacterial potency of enzyme-cleavable substrates,
which, as stated before, is of great clinical importance.
Figure 6
Schematic representation
of an enzyme-responsive substrate. Via
a layer-by-layer assembly method, a substrate was modified with chitosan-silver
nanocomposites (orange) and hyaluronic acid (blue). When bacteria
approach the surface (green), the enzyme hyaluronidase (HAase) (yellow)
will be released from the bacteria, which degrades the hyaluronic
acid and releases the silver ions from the surface (black). Those
silver ions will kill the approaching bacteria (red). Reprinted with
permission from Liu, P.; Hao, Y.; Ding, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Cai,
K. Fabrication of Enzyme-Responsive Composite Coating for the Design
of Antibacterial Surface. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.2018, 29, 160. Copyright 2018 Springer
Nature.
Schematic representation
of an enzyme-responsive substrate. Via
a layer-by-layer assembly method, a substrate was modified with chitosan-silver
nanocomposites (orange) and hyaluronic acid (blue). When bacteria
approach the surface (green), the enzyme hyaluronidase (HAase) (yellow)
will be released from the bacteria, which degrades the hyaluronic
acid and releases the silver ions from the surface (black). Those
silver ions will kill the approaching bacteria (red). Reprinted with
permission from Liu, P.; Hao, Y.; Ding, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Cai,
K. Fabrication of Enzyme-Responsive Composite Coating for the Design
of Antibacterial Surface. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.2018, 29, 160. Copyright 2018 Springer
Nature.Another example of an enzyme-mediated
release of antimicrobial
compounds for the control of bacterial populations is shown in the
work of Komnatnyy et al. In this study, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)
materials were modified with lipase-sensitive linkages.[85] They coupled ciprofloxacin, which is an antimicrobial
agent, to the lipase-labile bonds and mixed this in the system. When
exposed to the bacteria P. aeruginosa, which secretes the two lipases, Lipase A and Lipase C, the lipase-labile
linker is cleaved and the ciprofloxacin is released. In this way,
the bacteria triggers the release of antimicrobial agents, which kills
the bacteria that approaches the surface (Figure ). Those examples, that control bacterial
growth on a biomaterial surface, are both bidirectional biomaterial
responses. This means that, on the first contact with the bacteria,
the bacteria will be killed. However, as all the antimicrobial activity
is consumed there is no second line of defense, meaning over time
the implant can be infected by bacteria.
Figure 7
(A) Schematic representation
of a bacteria-triggered enzyme-responsive
release of antibiotics. PEG polymers are modified with an antibiotic
attached to an enzyme-sensitive linker. When bacteria approach the
surface, the bacteria secrete Lipase A (LipA) and Lipase C (LipC),
which will cleave the enzyme-sensitive linker and release the antibiotic.
(B) Chemical structure of the enzymatic cleavage of azelaic acid by
LipA and LipC, resulting in the release of the antibiotic (ciprofloxacin).
Reprinted with permission from ref (83). Copyright 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &
Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
(A) Schematic representation
of a bacteria-triggered enzyme-responsive
release of antibiotics. PEG polymers are modified with an antibiotic
attached to an enzyme-sensitive linker. When bacteria approach the
surface, the bacteria secrete Lipase A (LipA) and Lipase C (LipC),
which will cleave the enzyme-sensitive linker and release the antibiotic.
(B) Chemical structure of the enzymatic cleavage of azelaic acid by
LipA and LipC, resulting in the release of the antibiotic (ciprofloxacin).
Reprinted with permission from ref (83). Copyright 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &
Co. KGaA, Weinheim.The examples discussed
so far exploit the use of enzymes to control
surface properties and show that enzyme-responsive surfaces can be
used to deliver functional molecules to the local environment. In
this way, drugs can be delivered locally or bacterial growth can be
controlled. However, most of these systems are bidirectional biomaterial
responses, which means that, although the cellular cue gives a biomaterial
response, all the bioactivity is consumed upon first contact with
the enzyme. Therefore, research has shifted to biomaterials that show
continuous responses. In these biomaterials, bioactivity is remained
over multiple cycles of enzyme cleavage.
Enzyme-Responsive
Hydrogels
The systems
described above are 2D biomaterial networks; however, to make the
biomaterials more physiologically relevant and predictive to the natural
systems, 3D biomaterial networks are preferred. Hydrogels are water-swollen
3D networks of cross-linked polymer chains and are used in a variety
of biomedical applications due to their similarity to the natural
tissue.[86] In order to mimic the dynamic
properties of the natural system, it is important for a hydrogel to
respond to biochemical cues.[87] The physical
and mechanical properties of a hydrogel system can be modified by
the incorporation of specific groups within the hydrogel.[88−90] By the incorporation of reversible cross-link methods, the hydrogel
can change its properties when an external trigger is applied, such
as temperature, electric field, or small biomolecules.[41] This concept is often used to create injectable
hydrogels that can be used to deliver drugs.[91] One example is the work of Lutolf et al., who developed MMP-sensitive
hydrogels that form degradable networks for cell invasion. Changing
the physical and mechanical properties of a hydrogel system using
enzymatic cues could also be used to create injectable hydrogels that
gelate on demand.[92] The dynamic character
of the hydrogel and the possibility of modifying the physical, chemical,
and biological properties of the hydrogel makes them great candidates
for stimuli-responsive, continuous biomaterials. In order to show
the variety of systems and the versatility of enzyme-responsive hydrogels,
the following section will describe a few examples of enzyme-responsive
hydrogels, starting from simplistic bidirectional hydrogel systems,
either used as surface coating or as a 3D hydrogel network, followed
by more complicated injectable enzyme-responsive hydrogel systems
that evoke a continuous response to the tissue.
Bidirectional
Hydrogel Systems
In the study of Todd et al., a hydrogel
system was developed that
could control cell attachment on demand.[93] They tethered a well-known cell-adhesive bioactive peptide, arginine-glycine-aspartic
acid (RGD) to a polyethylene glycol acrylamide (PEGA) surface to control
cell attachment (Figure ). The RGDpeptide is capped by a Fmoc-F blocking group, whereby
the F amino acid serves as a recognition motif for different enzymes,
namely, chymotrypsin, thermolysin, and proteinase K. Although proteinase
K showed the highest cleavage of the three enzymes, it was not selective,
whereas the chymotrypsin was highly selective and used for further
studies. Before cleavage of the Fmoc-F by the chymotrypsin, the surface
was non-cell-adhesive for osteoblasts and in the “OFF”
state. When chymotrypsin was added for a couple of hours, the Fmoc-F
blocking group was cleaved off and the surface was in the “ON”
state, allowing cells to attach to the surface. In this study it was
shown that enzymes can be used to direct cell behavior on a hydrogel
system. The downside of this study is that, once the hydrogel is in
the “ON” state, it cannot go back into its “OFF”
state. Therefore, the biomaterial shows one cycle of bidirectional
response and not a continuous response, as desired in this system.
Figure 8
(A) A
surface out of PEGA monomers with a photoinitiator was modified
with RGD peptides. First, the surface was functionalized with PEGA
monomers. Then, the RGD peptide was synthesized by standard Fmoc-based
peptide synthesis. (B) Chemical structure of the “OFF”
(non-cell-adhesive) and “ON” (cell-adhesive) state of
the peptide-modified PEGA surface. Republished with permission from
Todd, S. J.; Farrar, D.; Gough, J. E.; Ulijn, R. V. Enzyme-triggered
cell attachment to hydrogel surfaces. Soft Matter2007, 3 (5), 547–550; permission
conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Copyright 2007 Royal
Society of Chemistry.
(A) A
surface out of PEGA monomers with a photoinitiator was modified
with RGDpeptides. First, the surface was functionalized with PEGA
monomers. Then, the RGDpeptide was synthesized by standard Fmoc-based
peptide synthesis. (B) Chemical structure of the “OFF”
(non-cell-adhesive) and “ON” (cell-adhesive) state of
the peptide-modified PEGA surface. Republished with permission from
Todd, S. J.; Farrar, D.; Gough, J. E.; Ulijn, R. V. Enzyme-triggered
cell attachment to hydrogel surfaces. Soft Matter2007, 3 (5), 547–550; permission
conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Copyright 2007 Royal
Society of Chemistry.A MMP-degradable PEG-based
hydrogel system was developed by Anderson
and co-workers.[94] In their work, a thiol–ene
photopolymerized PEG-peptidehydrogel was developed. The PEG was cross-linked
with different combinations of MMP-degradable or nondegradable monomers
and modified with cell-adhesive peptide ligands in order to create
degradable and nondegradable cell-adhesive networks (Figure ). Human mesenchymal stem cells
(hMSCs) were encapsulated in these MMP-degradable hydrogels, and their
survival, proliferation, and cell spreading were monitored. It was
shown that the hydrogel was degradable by MMPs (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3,
MMP-7, MMP-8, and MMP-9) and that the hMSCs survived in all hydrogels,
despite the presence or absence of the MMP-degradable linkers. However,
when there were fewer MMP-degradable linkers, the cell spreading was
less compared to the completely degradable systems. In conclusion,
the study showed that a hydrogel system could be formed that can be
used for the expansion of hMSCs. The degradable linkers could be used
as a drug-delivery system, providing cues to the hMSCs in situ. A
disadvantage of the study is that the cleavable linkers are not selective,
as they are cleaved by multiple MMPs of the body. Besides that, the
current system is not a continuous biomaterial, where a bioactive
cue is released in multiple cycles of activity, as the hydrogel is
only tested for cell attachment and not for drug delivery purposes.
Figure 9
(A) Chemical
structure of MMP-cleavable peptide linker. (B) Chemical
structure of nondegradable PEG-dithiol linker. (C) Chemical structure
of 4-armed PEG-norbornene cross-linker. (D) CRGDS were incorporated
to enhance cell attachment. (E) Schematic presentation of hydrogels
with different composition. Reprinted with permission from Anderson
S.; Lin C.; Kuntzler D.; Anseth K. The Performance of Human Mesenchymal
Stem Cells Encapsulated in Cell-Degradable Polymer–Peptide
Hydrogels. Biomaterials2011, 32 (14), 3564–3574. Copyright 2011 Elsevier.
(A) Chemical
structure of MMP-cleavable peptide linker. (B) Chemical
structure of nondegradable PEG-dithiol linker. (C) Chemical structure
of 4-armed PEG-norbornene cross-linker. (D) CRGDS were incorporated
to enhance cell attachment. (E) Schematic presentation of hydrogels
with different composition. Reprinted with permission from Anderson
S.; Lin C.; Kuntzler D.; Anseth K. The Performance of Human Mesenchymal
Stem Cells Encapsulated in Cell-Degradable Polymer–PeptideHydrogels. Biomaterials2011, 32 (14), 3564–3574. Copyright 2011 Elsevier.
Continuous Hydrogel Systems
A more
continuous system was designed in a study of Kraehenbuehl et al.[95] They used synthetic injectable hydrogels to
deliver thymosin β4 to an infarcted heart region (Figure ). The synthetic
hydrogel consists of a vinyl sulfone-functionalized branched PEG with
a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-cleavable peptide sequence. They
showed that the hydrogels were formed within a few minutes in situ
due to cross-linking of the vinyl sulfone of the PEGhydrogel. Moreover,
the thymosin β4 was released over time by the degradation of
the gel by MMP-2 and MMP-9, showing a decreased end systolic volume
compared to the control group, which indicates better cardiac infarction
healing. This was emphasized by the improved preservation of the cardiomyocytes
and the collagen deposition in the heart when treated with the thymosin
β4. In addition, the cardiomyocytes were better aligned and
there were more microvessels present for the treated rats compared
to the control. Overall, this hydrogel shows great potential for use
as a stem-cell therapy to improve tissue healing in situ. Due to the
sustained release of the thymosin β4, multiple cycles of bioactivity
can be achieved.
Figure 10
A gel precursor solution, consisting of vinyl sulfone-functionalized
branched poly(ethylene glycol) matrix was cross-linked with a MMP-sensitive
cross-linker, while thymosin β4 and hES cells were encapsulated.
As the gel gelates in a few minutes, the gel could be injected into
infarcted tissue in liquid form, followed by in situ gel formation.
Reprinted with permission from Kraehenbuehl, T. P.; Ferreira, L. S.;
Hayward, A. M.; Nahrendorf, M.; van der Vlies, A. J.; Vasile, E.;
Weissleder, R.; Langer, R.; Hubbell, J. A. Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived
Microvascular Grafts for Cardiac Tissue Preservation after Myocardial
Infarction. Biomaterials2011, 32 (4), 1102–1109. Copyright 2011 Elsevier.
A gel precursor solution, consisting of vinyl sulfone-functionalized
branched poly(ethylene glycol) matrix was cross-linked with a MMP-sensitive
cross-linker, while thymosin β4 and hES cells were encapsulated.
As the gel gelates in a few minutes, the gel could be injected into
infarcted tissue in liquid form, followed by in situ gel formation.
Reprinted with permission from Kraehenbuehl, T. P.; Ferreira, L. S.;
Hayward, A. M.; Nahrendorf, M.; van der Vlies, A. J.; Vasile, E.;
Weissleder, R.; Langer, R.; Hubbell, J. A. Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived
Microvascular Grafts for Cardiac Tissue Preservation after Myocardial
Infarction. Biomaterials2011, 32 (4), 1102–1109. Copyright 2011 Elsevier.The group of Burdick et al. developed an injectable
hydrogel system
that could regulate the MMP-activity at a MI site by adding a recombinant
TIMP-3 in a hydrogel with MMP-cleavable cross-links.[26] The hydrogel was based on a polysaccharide backbone (hyaluronic
acid (HA)) modified with either an aldehyde (ALD) or hydrazide (HYD) functional group.
The MMP-degradable peptide (GGRMSMPV) was functionalized with a HYD group at the N-terminus to react to the ALD and modified with a thiol group at the C-terminus to react to a
maleimide containing HYD group (Figure ). The negatively charged
polymer backbone was used to tether the recombinant TIMP-3 to the
hydrogel. When the hydrogel was injected in the myocardium, the TIMP-3
was released from the hydrogel due to the elevated MMP activity in
the myocardium. As a consequence, the MMP activity was inhibited by
the TIMP-3. This research shows the regulation of enzyme activity
by incorporating inhibiting molecules in the hydrogel and has great
advantages in the regenerative medicine field and demonstrates a way
to a continuous biomaterial response development.
Figure 11
(A) Hyaluronic acid
(HA) was modified with aldehyde
groups (ALD) or hydrazide groups (HYD) with a MMP-cleavable sequence, and dextran sulfate (DS) polymers were modified with aldehyde groups (ALD). (B) A hydrogel was developed by the cross-linking of the ALD and HYD groups. Reprinted with permission
from Purcell, B. P.; Lobb, D.; Charati, M. B.; Dorsey, S. M.; Wade,
R. J.; Zellars, K. N.; Doviak, H.; Pettaway, S.; Logdon, C. B.; Shuman,
J. A.; Freels, P. D.; Gorman, J. H.; Gorman, R. C.; Spinale, F. G.;
Burdick, J. A. Injectable and Bioresponsive Hydrogels for On-Demand
Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibition. Nature Materials2014, 13, 653–661. Copyright
2014 Springer Nature.
(A) Hyaluronic acid
(HA) was modified with aldehyde
groups (ALD) or hydrazide groups (HYD) with a MMP-cleavable sequence, and dextran sulfate (DS) polymers were modified with aldehyde groups (ALD). (B) A hydrogel was developed by the cross-linking of the ALD and HYD groups. Reprinted with permission
from Purcell, B. P.; Lobb, D.; Charati, M. B.; Dorsey, S. M.; Wade,
R. J.; Zellars, K. N.; Doviak, H.; Pettaway, S.; Logdon, C. B.; Shuman,
J. A.; Freels, P. D.; Gorman, J. H.; Gorman, R. C.; Spinale, F. G.;
Burdick, J. A. Injectable and Bioresponsive Hydrogels for On-Demand
Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibition. Nature Materials2014, 13, 653–661. Copyright
2014 Springer Nature.
Smart
Hydrogels (Based on Enzymes)
Smart hydrogels function as
many different functional systems, such
as actuators,[96] sensors,[97] drug delivery systems,[98] smart
surfaces,[52] self-healing hydrogels,[99] and controlled biodegradation in materials.[100] Although these systems are very dynamic, these
lack a continuous interaction between the hydrogel system and the
cell environment, and these systems are mostly bidirectional. In the
field of tissue engineering, biomaterials are required that promote
the novo formation of functional tissues and, thus, mimic the continuality
of the natural system.[101] As discussed
in the Introduction of this Perspective, cells
explore DR to communicate with the ECM in order to keep tissue homeostasis.[102] In order to mimic the dynamic reciprocity of
the natural system, new biomaterials are required that not only can
respond to cell stimuli, but also adapt and communicate to the cells.
One beautiful example of such a system is the work of Werner and co-workers
who developed a blood coagulation-responsive hydrogel.[103,104] They cross-linked a starPEG-heparin material with a thrombin-cleavable
peptide (NH2-Gly-Gly-(D)Phe-Pip-Arg-Ser-Trp-Gly-Cys-Gly-CONH2). When thrombin was presented to the hydrogel, the peptide
was cleaved between the arginine and serine amino acid and releases
heparin (Figure b). The released heparin inactivates the thrombin by complexation
of thrombin with its inhibitor (antithrombin; Figure c). In this way, degradation of the system
was inhibited and a negative feed-back loop is created (Figure d). As a proof
of concept, they incubated the hydrogel with whole blood and compared
the results with clinically applied polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
vascular grafts coated with and without heparin. When whole blood
was incubated on the PTFE grafts, solid blood clots formed on the
gels both without the heparin coating and with the heparin coated,
whereas the blood stayed a liquid on the responsive hydrogels, indicating
that blood-coagulation can be regulated with dynamic synthetic hydrogels.
This work is a great example for a continuous biomaterial, in which
bioactivity remains in multiple cycles of biomaterial response.
Figure 12
(A) Prothrombin
is cleaved, which will generate thrombin. (B) Thrombin
cleaves the peptide (NH2-Gly-Gly-(D)Phe-Pip-Arg-Ser-Trp-Gly-Cys-Gly-CONH2) of the linker unit between the arginine and the serine.
Thereby, heparin is released. (C) The released heparin serves as a
scaffold for the complexation of thrombin with its plasma-based inhibitor,
resulting in the inactivation of thrombin. (D) The inactivation of
thrombin results in the inhibition of heparin release. Reprinted with
permission from Maitz, M. F.; Freudenberg, U.; Tsurkan, M. V.; Fischer,
M.; Beyrich, T.; Werner, C. Bio-Responsive Polymer Hydrogels Homeostatically
Regulate Blood Coagulation. Nature Communications2013, 4, 2168. Copyright 2013 Springer
Nature.
(A) Prothrombin
is cleaved, which will generate thrombin. (B) Thrombin
cleaves the peptide (NH2-Gly-Gly-(D)Phe-Pip-Arg-Ser-Trp-Gly-Cys-Gly-CONH2) of the linker unit between the arginine and the serine.
Thereby, heparin is released. (C) The released heparinserves as a
scaffold for the complexation of thrombin with its plasma-based inhibitor,
resulting in the inactivation of thrombin. (D) The inactivation of
thrombin results in the inhibition of heparin release. Reprinted with
permission from Maitz, M. F.; Freudenberg, U.; Tsurkan, M. V.; Fischer,
M.; Beyrich, T.; Werner, C. Bio-Responsive PolymerHydrogels Homeostatically
Regulate Blood Coagulation. Nature Communications2013, 4, 2168. Copyright 2013 Springer
Nature.Responsive hydrogels have also
been engineered by using logic gates.[59] A recent study showed that Boolean logic operations,
such as YES, OR, and AND could be used to create a hydrogel that is
responsive to multiple stimuli.[105] In this
work, logic-based responsive cross-linkers were synthesized that were
either enzymatically degradable, respond to reducing conditions, or
that were responsive to light. To create the enzyme-degradable cross-linker,
a small peptide was synthesized (GPQGIWGQ) that is cleaved between
the glycine and isoleucine residue in the presence of MMPs. A disulfide
bond was used to create a bond that is responsive to reducing conditions.
Last, ortho-nitrobenzyl ester (oNB) was synthesized,
which undergoes photoscission upon cytocompatible near-ultraviolet
light exposure. With those three components, a library was created
with 17 different cross-linkers, modified with reactive azide moieties
to enable the cross-linkers to react with a four-arm poly(ethylene
glycol) tetrabicyclononyne (PEG-tetraBCN) by means of a strain-promoted
azide–alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC) reaction. They used different
combinations of enzyme, reducing components, and light to degrade
the hydrogel with the different cross-linkers and characterized the
reaction products with MALDI-TOF analysis. It was shown that indeed
the YES gate was working, as it degraded when the programmed cue was
presented to the hydrogel. The OR-gated hydrogels only degraded when
one of the cues was present, where the AND gate only degraded when
both of the cues were present, indicating that all the gates worked.
In their work, multiple gates were coupled to each other to get more
complicated (three-input) hydrogel systems, in which six out of eight
of the systems behaved as expected. The versatility of the system
was tested by adding a doxorubicin (DOX) to the AND gate system with
a target application of the specific and local death of cancer cells
(Figure ). It was
shown that when the cancer cells were incubated in the DOXhydrogel
and the right cues were present, the DNA content decreased, indicating
cell death. This work shows a great example of a next level hydrogel
system, in which multiple cues are needed to provoke a reaction and
can be used to mimic the dynamic reciprocity present in the natural
system.
Figure 13
(A) Chemical structure of a doxorubicin functionalized with BCN
for drug delivery purposes. (B) Schematic overview of a hydrogel with
cross-linkers (redox- and enzyme-responsive). When both the enzyme
is present and redox conditions apply (AND-gate), the gel is degraded,
thereby releasing the doxorubicin. The doxorubicin will induce apoptosis
in cervical cancer-derived HeLa cells. Reprinted with permission from
Badeau, B. A.; Comerford, M. P.; Arakawa, C. K.; Shadish, J. A.; DeForest,
C. A. Engineered Modular Biomaterial Logic Gates for Environmentally
Triggered Therapeutic Delivery. Nature Chemistry2018, 10 (3), 251–258. Copyright 2018
Springer Nature.
(A) Chemical structure of a doxorubicin functionalized with BCN
for drug delivery purposes. (B) Schematic overview of a hydrogel with
cross-linkers (redox- and enzyme-responsive). When both the enzyme
is present and redox conditions apply (AND-gate), the gel is degraded,
thereby releasing the doxorubicin. The doxorubicin will induce apoptosis
in cervical cancer-derived HeLa cells. Reprinted with permission from
Badeau, B. A.; Comerford, M. P.; Arakawa, C. K.; Shadish, J. A.; DeForest,
C. A. Engineered Modular Biomaterial Logic Gates for Environmentally
Triggered Therapeutic Delivery. Nature Chemistry2018, 10 (3), 251–258. Copyright 2018
Springer Nature.
Enzyme-Responsive
Supramolecular Assemblies
Introduction of DR inside a material
(Figure B) is proposed
to be achieved using supramolecular
assemblies. A supramolecular aggregate is an assembly of molecules
held together by directed, specific, noncovalent bonds, such as hydrogen
bonding, van der Waals forces, hydrophobic, π–π,
and electrostatic interactions.[106−108] The dimensions of assembly
range from two molecules on the nanometer scale to large complexes
of the micrometer scale.[109,110] Recent studies focus
on exploration of enzymes in supramolecular assemblies, in which the
enzyme can disrupt the supramolecular interactions or trigger the
supramolecular assembly.[111−115] These methods are of interest because of the ability to make a hydrogel
on demand, for example to trigger in situ gelation. One example in
which a hydrogel can be formed in situ by supramolecular assembly
is by Zhou et al. They developed an enzyme-instructed self-assembly
(EISA) method using phosphoserine-containing small peptides to form
hydrogels (Figure ).[113] In their study a self-assembling
unit, Nap-Phe-Phe sequence, was modified with different phosphorylated
serine precursors. The Nap-Phe-Phe sequence self-assembles upon aromatic–aromatic
interactions. The study showed that when alkaline phosphatase (ALP)
is added, the phosphoserine is dephosphorylated, which resulted in
the self-assembling of the small units into nanofibers, which formed
a hydrogel. They also explored the effect of using d-amino
acids instead of l-amino acids and showed that when d-amino acids are used, the hydrogels are stable against proteolysis.
These hydrogels can be used in different applications, such as drug
delivery systems and in situ hydrogel formation for cell therapy,
showing the versatility of their work.
Figure 14
Schematic illustration
of the enzyme-instructed self-assembly (EISA)
using small molecules that are modified with a phosphate. When the
phosphate is cleaved by phosphatase, the molecules can self-assemble
into nanofibers that results in supramolecular hydrogels. Reprinted
with permission from Zhou, J.; Du, X.; Wang, J.; Yamagata, N.; Xu,
B. Enzyme-Instructed Self-Assembly of Peptides Containing Phosphoserine
to Form Supramolecular Hydrogels as Potential Soft Biomaterials. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.2017, 11, 509–515. Copyright 2017 Springer Nature.
Schematic illustration
of the enzyme-instructed self-assembly (EISA)
using small molecules that are modified with a phosphate. When the
phosphate is cleaved by phosphatase, the molecules can self-assemble
into nanofibers that results in supramolecular hydrogels. Reprinted
with permission from Zhou, J.; Du, X.; Wang, J.; Yamagata, N.; Xu,
B. Enzyme-Instructed Self-Assembly of Peptides Containing Phosphoserine
to Form Supramolecular Hydrogels as Potential Soft Biomaterials. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.2017, 11, 509–515. Copyright 2017 Springer Nature.The group of Gianneschi et al. developed a different method
in
which a hydrogel can be formed in situ.[116] Sterically constrained pro-gelator peptides were developed that
flow freely until cleaved by disease-associated enzymes. The cyclic
peptides form self-assembling peptides which self-assemble into viscoelastic
hydrogels (Figure ). These hydrogels were than tested on their ability to hydrogelate
when injected in the myocardium after myocardial infarction (MI).
The SAPs were therefore modified with recognition sites for MI-associated
proteases. It was shown that hydrogel formation occurred and that
the viscoelastic hydrogels were stable against excess proteolysis.
In this way, tissue can be repaired locally and also drugs can be
loaded in the hydrogel to be released locally. When designed in such
a way that the drugs are released in a sustained fashion, a continuous
biomaterial can be designed.
Figure 15
Schematic representation of enzyme-responsive
self-assembling peptides.
(A) A progelator peptide consisting of a MMP-recognition site (red)
and a gelling sequence (blue). (B) The enzyme cleaves the progelator
peptide, resulting in the linearization of the peptides into self-assembling
peptides (SAPs). (C) At physiologic conditions, the SAPs hydrogelate
into a hydrogel. Reprinted with permission from ref (116), licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this
license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Schematic representation of enzyme-responsive
self-assembling peptides.
(A) A progelator peptide consisting of a MMP-recognition site (red)
and a gelling sequence (blue). (B) The enzyme cleaves the progelator
peptide, resulting in the linearization of the peptides into self-assembling
peptides (SAPs). (C) At physiologic conditions, the SAPshydrogelate
into a hydrogel. Reprinted with permission from ref (116), licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this
license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.One example of such a drug-release hydrogel is by Li et al.,
who
focused on the development of drug-release hydrogels to prevent HIV
transmission.[117] In this study hydrogelators
were used, that self-assemble in water through supramolecular interactions
(Figure ). Three
components were coupled to the hydrogelators; an anti-HIV and anti-inflammatory
drug and a phosphate group, whereby the phosphate group allowed the
hydrogelation to occur at physiological pH. In acidic conditions,
the hydrogelator self-assembles into supramolecular nanofibers. Upon
the presence of the enzyme prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), the cleavage
of the phosphate group is catalyzed which resulted in a stronger network
of nanofibers with enhanced elasticity. At physiological pH (pH 7.4)
the ester bond in the hydrogelator is cleaved and the anti-inflammatory
drug and anti-HIV drug are released from the hydrogel in a sustained
matter. This study shows an approach for the development of enzyme-regulated
drug release hydrogels preventing HIV transmission. As the drug is
released in a sustained matter, the hydrogels come close to continuous
biomaterials which mimic the DR in the natural ECM.
Figure 16
Schematic representation
of the enzyme-responsive hydrogel system.
Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) will cleave the phosphate group of
a small precursor hydrogelator, which allows the precursor to self-assemble
into a hydrogel. Therapeutic drugs can be attached to the hydrogelator
to create a drug-releasing hydrogel. Reprinted with permission from
ref (117). Copyright
2003 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Schematic representation
of the enzyme-responsive hydrogel system.
Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) will cleave the phosphate group of
a small precursor hydrogelator, which allows the precursor to self-assemble
into a hydrogel. Therapeutic drugs can be attached to the hydrogelator
to create a drug-releasing hydrogel. Reprinted with permission from
ref (117). Copyright
2003 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.Another example of the delivery of drugs to a target site
by the
use of supramolecular assemblies is by Kalafatovic and co-workers.[118] In this research, peptide micelles were developed
that formed fibrillar nanostructures upon hydrolysis by MMP-9 (Figure ). The peptide
micelles consisted of short β-sheet forming peptides that are
susceptible to MMP-9 cleavage. They encapsulated a hydrophobic drug
molecule (doxorubicin) in the hydrophobic core of the peptide micelles
and showed that the doxorubicin could be slowly released from the
fibrillar nanostructures both in vitro and in vivo upon cleavage by
MMP-9. In this way, a micelle was formed that could be used as nanocarrier,
which could locally release drugs at the target site for the inhibition
of tumor growth, which is of great clinical importance.
Figure 17
(A) Schematic
representation of the transformation of micelles
to supramolecular fibers in the presence of cancer cells. When the
micelles approaches the cell, where there is an elevated level of
MMP-9, the micelles are hydrolyzed and the doxorubicin will be trapped
in the fibrillar structures. These fibrillar structures will release
doxorubicin in a sustained matter to the cancer cell, which will cause
the cell to die. (B) Chemical structures of the MMP-9 responsive peptide
amphiphile. Reprinted with permission from Kalafatovic, D.; Nobis,
M.; Son, J.; Anderson, K. I.; Ulijn, R. V. MMP-9 Triggered Self-assembly
of Doxorubicin Nanofiber Depots Halts Tumor Growth. Biomaterials2016, 98, 192–202,. Copyright
2016 Elsevier.
(A) Schematic
representation of the transformation of micelles
to supramolecular fibers in the presence of cancer cells. When the
micelles approaches the cell, where there is an elevated level of
MMP-9, the micelles are hydrolyzed and the doxorubicin will be trapped
in the fibrillar structures. These fibrillar structures will release
doxorubicin in a sustained matter to the cancer cell, which will cause
the cell to die. (B) Chemical structures of the MMP-9 responsive peptide
amphiphile. Reprinted with permission from Kalafatovic, D.; Nobis,
M.; Son, J.; Anderson, K. I.; Ulijn, R. V. MMP-9 Triggered Self-assembly
of Doxorubicin Nanofiber Depots Halts Tumor Growth. Biomaterials2016, 98, 192–202,. Copyright
2016 Elsevier.In the work of Pieszka et al.,
control over supramolecular assembly
and disassembly, rather than the formation of in situ hydrogels, was
the focus of study.[119] A boronic acid-carbamate
bond containing depsipeptide sequence was designed which could assemble
into β-sheets upon hydrolysis and disassemble again by oxidation
of the peptide (Figure ). The peptide sequence consisted of the KIKISQINM amino acid
sequence in which the serine allowed for the formation of an ester-bond
oligopeptide, which could undergo O,N-acyl rearrangement (Figure A). This, in combination
with the hydrolysis of the carbamate bond by enzymes, allowed for
the self-assembly of the peptide into β-sheets (Figure B). The self-assembly was
directed by the hydrogen bonds between the amide groups in the backbone
of the peptide and the hydrophobic interactions of the amino-acid
side chains. The methionine in the amino-acid sequence could undergo
oxidation by H2O2, which caused electrostatic
repulsion between the residues and therefore resulted in the disassembly
of the peptide into single strands. This concept of the external control
on assembly and disassembly of oligopeptides could have a great impact
in the biomedical field, for example, as hydrogel systems or drug
delivery vehicles.
Figure 18
(A) Chemical structure of the depsi-oligopeptide (KIKISQINM),
which
was modified with a boronic acid carbamate bond. Hydrolysis of the
carbamate bond and O,N-acyl rearrangement of the serine resulted in
a linear peptide. The methionine of the linear peptide could be oxidized
to form methionine sulfoxide. (B) Schematic representation of the
assembly and disassembly of the depsi-oligopeptides. Sterically constrained
depsi-oligopeptides could self-assemble into β-sheets and fibrils
after hydrolysis. Then, the fibers could disassemble again after oxidation
of the methionine. Reprinted with permission from ref (119). Copyright 2019 Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
(A) Chemical structure of the depsi-oligopeptide (KIKISQINM),
which
was modified with a boronic acidcarbamate bond. Hydrolysis of the
carbamate bond and O,N-acyl rearrangement of the serine resulted in
a linear peptide. The methionine of the linear peptide could be oxidized
to form methionine sulfoxide. (B) Schematic representation of the
assembly and disassembly of the depsi-oligopeptides. Sterically constrained
depsi-oligopeptides could self-assemble into β-sheets and fibrils
after hydrolysis. Then, the fibers could disassemble again after oxidation
of the methionine. Reprinted with permission from ref (119). Copyright 2019 Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.Another study in which control over assembly and disassembly was
obtained was in a study of Webber et al.[120] Protein kinase A (PKA) was used as an enzymatic trigger to control
the assembly of peptide amphiphile (PA) nanostructures (Figure ). PKA is an important
enzyme in the cell, which has been involved in numerous signaling
processes.[121] Besides that, it is also
expressed by tumor cells and is, therefore, a good cancer biomarker.[122] PAs are peptide sequences that can self-assemble
into bioactive nanostructures. The PA consists out of a hydrophobic
tail, a β-sheet forming peptide sequence and a bioactive epitope
(Figure A). The
hydrophobic collapse of the hydrophobic tail and the hydrogen bond
formation within the β-sheet forming peptide sequence causes
the bioactive epitope to become present at the surface of the of the
filamentous nanostructures. This allows for modification of the bioactive
epitope with, for example, enzymes. Upon treatment of the PA with
PKA, phosphorylation of the PA at the serine residue caused the peptide
to disassemble (Figure B). This process could be reversed by adding phosphatase that
cleaved the phosphate group, which resulted in the formation of filamentous
nanostructures again (Figure B). Moreover, in this study a hydrophobic drug (DOX) was loaded
into the core of the PA. It was shown that the drug, loaded in the
PA, could be released upon phosphorylation by PKA, which was excreted
by the cancer cells. The released DOX induced cytotoxicity to the
cells. This study is a great example in which a drug could be specifically
released at the site of interest. The diversity of the peptide sequences
that can be used to design a PA allows for the development of PA-based
enzyme-responsive networks for a wide range of biological applications.
Figure 19
(A)
Chemical structure of the peptide amphiphile (PA). The serine
amino-acid of the PA could be phosphorylated by protein kinase A and
this process could be reversed by the dephosphorylation by alkaline
phosphatase. (B) Schematic representation of the assembly and disassembly
of the PA upon treatment with protein kinase A or treatment with alkaline
phosphatase. Republished with permission from Webber, M. J.; Newcomb,
C. J.; Bitton, R.; Stupp, S. I. Switching of Self-Assembly in a Peptide
Nanostructure with a Specific Enzyme. Soft Matter20117 (20), 9665–9672; permission
conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Copyright 2011 Royal
Society of Chemistry.
(A)
Chemical structure of the peptide amphiphile (PA). The serine
amino-acid of the PA could be phosphorylated by protein kinase A and
this process could be reversed by the dephosphorylation by alkaline
phosphatase. (B) Schematic representation of the assembly and disassembly
of the PA upon treatment with protein kinase A or treatment with alkaline
phosphatase. Republished with permission from Webber, M. J.; Newcomb,
C. J.; Bitton, R.; Stupp, S. I. Switching of Self-Assembly in a Peptide
Nanostructure with a Specific Enzyme. Soft Matter20117 (20), 9665–9672; permission
conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Copyright 2011 Royal
Society of Chemistry.
Epilogue
In the past century, the biomaterials field has enormously evolved.
In the beginning of the 20th century, biomaterials were developed
that provide only static support to the extracellular environment.
At the end of the 20th century, research moved from solely static
materials to more dynamic materials by adding small peptide sequences
to the materials, incorporating bioactivity.[123] These bioactivated biomaterials showed improved interaction with
the tissue environment and could enhance biomaterial performance.[124] The last years, more complex biomaterials are
being developed as highlighted in this perspective. Complex biomaterials
have arisen that have control over cell adhesion, antimicrobial activity
and biomaterial degradation. However, there are still some challenges
that must be addressed. Despite the complexity of the enzyme-responsive
systems, the systems are mostly bidirectional in their response.[2] In the ideal case, the biomaterial should be
more complex and better mimic the ECM, by having a true interaction
with the tissue environment. When we can develop biomaterials that
act autonomous, we can mimic the biological system better. This could
be accomplished by incorporating cues in the biomaterial that are
responsive to multiple biological stimuli. The biomaterial can give
a different response when each of the stimuli is present. In order
to create the ideal autonomous biomaterial that mimic the DR of the
natural ECM, supramolecular systems could be used (Figure ). The advantage of supramolecular
systems over covalent systems is that the molecular building blocks
in supramolecular materials can be mixed-and-matched in order to combine
the different properties of
the building blocks in one material. Another advantage is that supramolecular
materials mimic the natural system better due to their intrinsic dynamics.
Supramolecular materials constantly assemble and disassemble, like
the natural ECM (Figure ). By the use of a modular approach, the intrinsic dynamics
of the supramolecular system can be tuned in order to create responsive
biomaterials.[125] Eventually, an unprecedented,
learning response could be created by mixing in different biofunctional
molecules, like enzyme-responsive cues, bioactive epitopes and drug
molecules. For example, in the work of Putti et al. a multicomponent
supramolecular fiber was developed, by coaxial electrospinning of
a elastomeric ureido-pyrimidinone (UPy)–poly(hexa methylene
carbonate) (UPy-PC) core with a hydrophilic shell of poly(ethylene-glycol)
(UPy-PEG).[126] A hydrophilic and hydrophobic
drug was encapsulated in the hydrogel and it was shown that, depending
on the hydrophilicity of the drug, a burst release was observed (hydrophilic
drugs) or a sustained release (hydrophobic drugs). When these drugs
are modified that they are released upon certain cellular cues, an
autonomous hydrogel could be created, in which a drug is released
when a cellular cue is present. The drug in its turn, will be uptaken
by the cell and provoke a cellular response. This response could be
inhibition of the drug release, or has an effect on cell behavior,
i.e. cell differentiation, cell migration, cell apoptosis (Figure ). By the use of
a modular approach, enzyme-responsive moieties could be mixed into
a mechanically stable biomaterial in order to create a biomaterial
that allows for both the degradation of the material by cells and
the maintenance of the cell commitment by tuning the mechanical properties
of the material.[127] In a study of Lueckgen
et al. an enzyme-degradable peptide-cross-linked hydrogel was developed
using norbornene and cysteine terminating peptides (RGDpeptides and
MMP-cleavable peptides). They were able to decouple the mechanical
and rheological properties of the hydrogel from the degradation behavior,
thereby allowing the cells to migrate through the material. This could
be used for example cell-mediated drug delivery systems or tissue
healing applications.
Figure 20
A continuous supramolecular biomaterial response with
both surface
reactivity and intrinsic dynamics. The cell binds to the material
(1) and the cell releases molecules (2) that will create a response
to the biomaterial (3); it will release some of its bioactive molecules
(4). These molecules can be internalized in the cell (5). The bioactive
molecules will in their turn inhibit the released molecules from the
cell (6). This process can be repeated multiple times. At the same
time, the supramolecular material is constant remodeling by assembly
and disassembly of the supramolecular fibers.
A continuous supramolecular biomaterial response with
both surface
reactivity and intrinsic dynamics. The cell binds to the material
(1) and the cell releases molecules (2) that will create a response
to the biomaterial (3); it will release some of its bioactive molecules
(4). These molecules can be internalized in the cell (5). The bioactive
molecules will in their turn inhibit the released molecules from the
cell (6). This process can be repeated multiple times. At the same
time, the supramolecular material is constant remodeling by assembly
and disassembly of the supramolecular fibers.The challenge remains to overcome aspecific responses and crosstalk
between different pathways. Another challenge is to design a biomaterial
that has the right mechanical properties as well as the desired chemical
and biological properties. Most continuous biomaterials being developed
are hydrogel systems, which is not suitable for all tissue engineering
applications. A challenge remains to develop a solid biomaterial that
is able to show some continuous biomaterial response as described
above (Figure ).
One way to overcome this problem is by mimic the design and complexity
of natural systems by combining multiple natural systems in one, like
done in supramolecular systems. Building blocks could be designed
that are cleavable by enzymes from the body. On the cleavable linker
a functional molecule is placed, that can, for example, induce apoptosis
in tumor cells or inhibit the secretion of enzymes that cleave the
linker. In this way, a multicomponent system is designed that has
biological activity and can inhibit its own process.In the
end, biomaterials should be developed that show true interaction
with the host tissue, being able to adapt and response to cellular
cues, being fully autonomous in order to mimic the natural systems
and thereby treating diseases that are challenging to address.
Authors: Gregory S Schultz; Jeffrey M Davidson; Robert S Kirsner; Paul Bornstein; Ira M Herman Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2011 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Brendan P Purcell; David Lobb; Manoj B Charati; Shauna M Dorsey; Ryan J Wade; Kia N Zellars; Heather Doviak; Sara Pettaway; Christina B Logdon; James A Shuman; Parker D Freels; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Francis G Spinale; Jason A Burdick Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2014-03-30 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Andrea S Carlini; Roberto Gaetani; Rebecca L Braden; Colin Luo; Karen L Christman; Nathan C Gianneschi Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 14.919