Over the last century, the study of mouse behavior has uncovered insights into brain molecular mechanisms while revealing potential causes of many neurological disorders. To this end, researchers have widely exploited the use of mutant strains, including those generated in mutagenesis screens and those produced using increasingly sophisticated genome engineering technologies. It is now relatively easy to access mouse models carrying alleles that faithfully recapitulate changes found in human patients or bearing variants of genes that provide data on those genes' functions. Concurrent with these developments has been an appreciation of the limitations of some current testing platforms, especially those monitoring complex behaviors. Out-of-cage observational testing is useful in describing overt persistent phenotypes but risks missing sporadic or intermittent events. Furthermore, measuring the progression of a phenotype, potentially over many months, can be difficult while relying on assays that may be susceptible to changes in the testing environment. In recent years, there has also been increasing awareness that measurement of behaviors in isolation can be limiting, given that mice attempt to hide behavioral cues of vulnerability. To overcome these limitations, laboratory animal science is capitalizing on progress in data capture and processing expertise. Moreover, as additional recording modes become commonplace, ultrasonic vocalization recording is an appealing focus, as mice use vocalizations in various social contexts. Using video and audio technologies, we record the voluntary, unprovoked behaviors and vocalizations of mice in social groups. Adoption of these approaches is undoubtedly set to increase, as they capture the round-the-clock behavior of mouse strains.
Over the last century, the study of mouse behavior has uncovered insights into brain molecular mechanisms while revealing potential causes of many neurological disorders. To this end, researchers have widely exploited the use of mutant strains, including those generated in mutagenesis screens and those produced using increasingly sophisticated genome engineering technologies. It is now relatively easy to access mouse models carrying alleles that faithfully recapitulate changes found in humanpatients or bearing variants of genes that provide data on those genes' functions. Concurrent with these developments has been an appreciation of the limitations of some current testing platforms, especially those monitoring complex behaviors. Out-of-cage observational testing is useful in describing overt persistent phenotypes but risks missing sporadic or intermittent events. Furthermore, measuring the progression of a phenotype, potentially over many months, can be difficult while relying on assays that may be susceptible to changes in the testing environment. In recent years, there has also been increasing awareness that measurement of behaviors in isolation can be limiting, given that mice attempt to hide behavioral cues of vulnerability. To overcome these limitations, laboratory animal science is capitalizing on progress in data capture and processing expertise. Moreover, as additional recording modes become commonplace, ultrasonic vocalization recording is an appealing focus, as mice use vocalizations in various social contexts. Using video and audio technologies, we record the voluntary, unprovoked behaviors and vocalizations of mice in social groups. Adoption of these approaches is undoubtedly set to increase, as they capture the round-the-clock behavior of mouse strains.
Authors: Miguel A Tejada; Ana I Santos-Llamas; Lesley Escriva; Juan J Tarin; Antonio Cano; Maria J Fernández-Ramírez; Paulina Nunez-Badinez; Bianca De Leo; Philippa T K Saunders; Victor Vidal; Florent Barthas; Katy Vincent; Patrick J Sweeney; Rowland R Sillito; James Douglas Armstrong; Jens Nagel; Raúl Gomez Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-02-21
Authors: Christian J M I Klein; Thomas Budiman; Judith R Homberg; Dilip Verma; Jaap Keijer; Evert M van Schothorst Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Fabrizio Grieco; Briana J Bernstein; Barbara Biemans; Lior Bikovski; C Joseph Burnett; Jesse D Cushman; Elsbeth A van Dam; Sydney A Fry; Bar Richmond-Hacham; Judith R Homberg; Martien J H Kas; Helmut W Kessels; Bastijn Koopmans; Michael J Krashes; Vaishnav Krishnan; Sreemathi Logan; Maarten Loos; Katharine E McCann; Qendresa Parduzi; Chaim G Pick; Thomas D Prevot; Gernot Riedel; Lianne Robinson; Mina Sadighi; August B Smit; William Sonntag; Reinko F Roelofs; Ruud A J Tegelenbosch; Lucas P J J Noldus Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Szczepan W Baran; Natalie Bratcher; John Dennis; Stefano Gaburro; Eleanor M Karlsson; Sean Maguire; Paul Makidon; Lucas P J J Noldus; Yohann Potier; Giorgio Rosati; Matt Ruiter; Laura Schaevitz; Patrick Sweeney; Megan R LaFollette Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 3.558