Jarmila A Zdanowicz1, Sophie Schneider1, Martin Mueller1, Ruedi Tschudi2, Daniel Surbek3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Theodor-Kocher-Haus, Friedbühlstrasse 19, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. 2. Sevisa AG, Ermatingen, Switzerland. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Theodor-Kocher-Haus, Friedbühlstrasse 19, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. daniel.surbek@insel.ch.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Peripartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains one of the main causes of maternal mortality worldwide. Treatment includes administration of packed red blood cells (RBC) in severe cases and patient blood management (PBM) may reduce it significantly. In our study, we wanted to retrospectively assess red blood cell administration in PPH to evaluate the impact of PBM in Switzerland. METHODS: Using data from the Swiss obstetric hospital registry (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schweizer Frauenkliniken, ASF), we included patients with deliveries from 1998 to 2016. We examined available obstetric data as well as blood loss and RBC administration in the acute and subacute peripartal phase. We categorized data into two time intervals: 1998-2011 and 2012-2016, as new PPH guidelines in Switzerland were established in 2012. RESULTS: PPH incidence increased between 1998 and 2016 significantly. The number of vaginal instrumental deliveries and cesarean sections increased as well. Administration of three or more RBC units, as defined in the ASF registry, in the acute and subacute phase in Switzerland has decreased after 2012. Conversely, we saw an increase in the administration of one to two RBC units in the acute and subacute phase. Nevertheless, overall RBC administration has been decreasing from 1998 to 2016. CONCLUSION: The increase of patients obtaining one or two units of RBC for PPH suggests that there may be a potential for effective implication of PBM in obstetrics. Reduction of RBC transfusion in the context of PPH may not only decrease maternal morbidity, but decrease economic costs as well.
PURPOSE: Peripartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains one of the main causes of maternal mortality worldwide. Treatment includes administration of packed red blood cells (RBC) in severe cases and patient blood management (PBM) may reduce it significantly. In our study, we wanted to retrospectively assess red blood cell administration in PPH to evaluate the impact of PBM in Switzerland. METHODS: Using data from the Swiss obstetric hospital registry (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schweizer Frauenkliniken, ASF), we included patients with deliveries from 1998 to 2016. We examined available obstetric data as well as blood loss and RBC administration in the acute and subacute peripartal phase. We categorized data into two time intervals: 1998-2011 and 2012-2016, as new PPH guidelines in Switzerland were established in 2012. RESULTS: PPH incidence increased between 1998 and 2016 significantly. The number of vaginal instrumental deliveries and cesarean sections increased as well. Administration of three or more RBC units, as defined in the ASF registry, in the acute and subacute phase in Switzerland has decreased after 2012. Conversely, we saw an increase in the administration of one to two RBC units in the acute and subacute phase. Nevertheless, overall RBC administration has been decreasing from 1998 to 2016. CONCLUSION: The increase of patients obtaining one or two units of RBC for PPH suggests that there may be a potential for effective implication of PBM in obstetrics. Reduction of RBC transfusion in the context of PPH may not only decrease maternal morbidity, but decrease economic costs as well.
Entities:
Keywords:
Patient blood management; Peripartum hemorrhage; Red blood cell; Transfusion
Authors: Patrick Meybohm; Eva Herrmann; Andrea U Steinbicker; Maria Wittmann; Matthias Gruenewald; Dania Fischer; Georg Baumgarten; Jochen Renner; Hugo K Van Aken; Christian F Weber; Markus M Mueller; Christof Geisen; Julia Rey; Dimitra Bon; Gudrun Hintereder; Suma Choorapoikayil; Johannes Oldenburg; Christian Brockmann; Raoul G Geissler; Erhard Seifried; Kai Zacharowski Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Rezan Abdul-Kadir; Claire McLintock; Anne-Sophie Ducloy; Hazem El-Refaey; Adrian England; Augusto B Federici; Chad A Grotegut; Susan Halimeh; Jay H Herman; Stefan Hofer; Andra H James; Peter A Kouides; Michael J Paidas; Flora Peyvandi; Rochelle Winikoff Journal: Transfusion Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: M Muñoz; J P Peña-Rosas; S Robinson; N Milman; W Holzgreve; C Breymann; F Goffinet; J Nizard; F Christory; C-M Samama; J-F Hardy Journal: Transfus Med Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 2.019
Authors: Patrick Meybohm; Bernd Froessler; Lawrence T Goodnough; Andrew A Klein; Manuel Muñoz; Michael F Murphy; Toby Richards; Aryeh Shander; Donat R Spahn; Kai Zacharowski Journal: Perioper Med (Lond) Date: 2017-03-17
Authors: Dietmar Schlembach; Hanns Helmer; Wolfgang Henrich; Christian von Heymann; Franz Kainer; Wolfgang Korte; Maritta Kühnert; Heiko Lier; Holger Maul; Werner Rath; Susanne Steppat; Daniel Surbek; Jürgen Wacker Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Gabriele Saccone; Luigi Della Corte; Pietro D'Alessandro; Bruno Ardino; Luigi Carbone; Antonio Raffone; Maurizio Guida; Mariavittoria Locci; Fulvio Zullo; Vincenzo Berghella Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2019-01-31