Synthetic assembly within living cells represents an innovative way to explore purely chemical tools that can direct and control cellular behavior. We use a simple and modular platform that is broadly accessible and yet incorporates highly intricate molecular recognition, immolative, and rearrangement chemistry. Short bimodular peptide sequences undergo a programmed sequence of events that can be tailored within the living intracellular environment. Each sequential stage of the pathways beginning with the cellular uptake, intracellular transport, and localization imposes distinct structural changes that result in the assembly of fibrillar architectures inside cells. The observation of apoptosis, which is characterized by the binding of Annexin V, demonstrates that programmed cell death can be promoted by the peptide assembly. Higher complexity of the assemblies was also achieved by coassembly of two different sequences, resulting in intrinsically fluorescent architectures. As such, we demonstrate that the in situ construction of architectures within cells will broaden the community's perspective toward how structure formation can impact a living system.
Synthetic assembly within living cells represents an innovative way to explore purely chemical tools that can direct and control cellular behavior. We use a simple and modular platform that is broadly accessible and yet incorporates highly intricate molecular recognition, immolative, and rearrangement chemistry. Short bimodular peptide sequences undergo a programmed sequence of events that can be tailored within the living intracellular environment. Each sequential stage of the pathways beginning with the cellular uptake, intracellular transport, and localization imposes distinct structural changes that result in the assembly of fibrillar architectures inside cells. The observation of apoptosis, which is characterized by the binding of Annexin V, demonstrates that programmed cell death can be promoted by the peptide assembly. Higher complexity of the assemblies was also achieved by coassembly of two different sequences, resulting in intrinsically fluorescent architectures. As such, we demonstrate that the in situ construction of architectures within cells will broaden the community's perspective toward how structure formation can impact a living system.
Supramolecular
interactions govern core aspects of cellular life
where they are omnipresent in every biological pathway. On the molecular
level, noncovalent forces guide structure formation and biomolecular
interactions, which can be seen within the DNA double helix, the secondary
to quaternary structures of proteins, and the dipoles of lipids. Systematically,
the individual assemblies propagate into interconnecting systems to
perform DNA replication/transcription, protein folding/receptor interactions,
and shuttling molecules in and out of cells.[1] The resulting dynamics between these biological processes would
thus define the fundamental elements of life (i.e., proliferation,
homeostasis, metabolism).As a whole, it is critical to realize
that many of these assemblies
elicit their function at the nanometer level, while their separate
constituents are seemingly nonfunctional (i.e., nucleotides/DNA, fatty
acids/vesicles, rRNA/ribosome).[1] Therefore,
instead of using intrinsically bioactive components like proteins
or DNA, the impact of nanoscience toward biology can also be realized
through structure formation. Application wise, there has been growing
interest in methods to enrich and accumulate drug molecules within
cells to circumvent efflux-based drug resistance.[2,3] As
the rate of efflux of molecules is directly dependent on size,[4,5] significant efforts have been made to direct drug/imaging molecules
to form aggregates within cells[6,7] and with promising in
vivo results.[8,9]Nonetheless, the bioactivity
of these systems often originates
from known small molecule interactions such as from a chemotherapeutic
agent or singlet oxygen production by metal complexes.[10,11] In contrast, specific biological responses, like programmed cell
death, driven purely by the formed self-assembled nanostructures are
less known. We envisioned that the assembly of nonfunctional constituents
into functional architectures directly in a living cell would not
only be a significant milestone in nanobiotechnology but also provide
a platform to integrate synthetic chemistry with living processes.Herein, we report the construction of two peptide sequences designed
to undergo a multistage transformation that results in the assembly
of fibrillar architectures inside cancer cells (Figure ). The first stage, comprising the cellular
entry process, is gated by a pH-dependent boronic acid–salicylhydroxamate
complexation.[12] This chemistry links a
transporter “TAT” sequence (trans-activator of transcription),
derived from the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV),[13] together with a pro-assembling sequence (henceforth referred
as depsipeptide). As such, upon successful endocytosis, acidification
within the intracellular vesicles releases the pro-assembling sequence.
Here, the second and third stage are incorporated into the pro-assembling
sequence with the second stage guarded by an immolative boronic acid
cage sensitive toward elevated or endogenous H2O2 within cancer cells.[14−16] Upon the immolation of the cage, the third stage
is triggered by the O,N-acyl rearrangement of the
depsipeptide that generates the linear isoleucine-serine-alanine (ISA)
self-assembling motif.[17,18] Production of ISA promotes the
final stage of self-assembly into fibrillar architectures and in the
process triggers apoptosis.
Figure 1
Intracellular coassembly of peptides. (a) Depsipeptides
(kinked
arrows) are uptaken by cells due to dynamic covalently bound salicylhydroxamate-TAT
(SHA-TAT, red coil, step A). After hydrolysis of the complex in an
acidic environment (step B), the boronic acid headgroup of the depsipeptides
is cleaved by intracellular hydrogen peroxide (step C). Subsequent O,N-acyl shift forms the linear coassembling peptides (step
D). Linear peptides (straight arrows) form fibrillar networks inside
A549 cells (step E), which are visible by transmission electron microscopy
(TEM, scale bar 500 nm). (b) Chemical reactions that lead to cellular
uptake, peptide linearization, and peptide coassembly of Fmoc (green)
and coumarin 343 (blue) functionalized ISA.
Intracellular coassembly of peptides. (a) Depsipeptides
(kinked
arrows) are uptaken by cells due to dynamic covalently bound salicylhydroxamate-TAT
(SHA-TAT, red coil, step A). After hydrolysis of the complex in an
acidic environment (step B), the boronic acid headgroup of the depsipeptides
is cleaved by intracellular hydrogen peroxide (step C). Subsequent O,N-acyl shift forms the linear coassembling peptides (step
D). Linear peptides (straight arrows) form fibrillar networks inside
A549 cells (step E), which are visible by transmission electron microscopy
(TEM, scale bar 500 nm). (b) Chemical reactions that lead to cellular
uptake, peptide linearization, and peptide coassembly of Fmoc (green)
and coumarin 343 (blue) functionalized ISA.In essence, the design comprises three modular components: (1)
the pro-assembling depsi unit and its pH-reversible functionalization
with TAT, (2) the peroxide-triggered cleavage of the boronic acid
masking group, and the (3) pH-controlled O,N-acyl
rearrangement to generate the self-assembling peptide sequence. In
this way, intracellular transport, release, and supramolecular assembly
into peptide fibrils is individually and sequentially programmed inside
different cellular compartments by consecutive chemical reactions
(Figure ).In
addition, we demonstrate coassembly as a strategy to increase
the level of functionality by imparting fluorescence into the fibrillar
structures to allow imaging.[19,20] Coassembly, i.e., assembly
of more than a single component, is prevalent in Nature, and important
examples include the assembly of α-/β-tubulin in microtubules,[21] cholesterol/phospholipids in membranes,[22] or the Arp2/3 complex in actins.[23] While Nature uses highly specific proteins to
transport and program these assemblies, synthetic methods are advantageous
as they can be bioorthogonal and also be specifically tailored. By
incorporating sophisticated chemical designs into a simple bimodular
peptide sequence, we demonstrate that synthetic architectures can
be formed directly within living systems using natural triggers.
Results
and Discussion
Solid-phase peptide synthesis using fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl
(Fmoc)
chemistry was conducted with alanine-preloaded Wang resin (Scheme ). Fmoc-serine was
added as the second amino acid using (benzotriazol-1-yloxy)tripyrrolidinophosphonium
hexafluorophosphate (PyBOP) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA).[24] Importantly,
Fmoc-serine was used without a protecting group on the hydroxyl group
in order to create an ester bond with isoleucine later in the synthesis.
After Fmoc deprotection of serine, modification of the N-terminus
using 4-(nitrophenyl)phenylboronic acid pinacol ester was performed.
Fmoc-isoleucine was coupled on the amino acid side chain of serine
using N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide
(DIC) and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP), forming the ester and
therefore the so-called depsipeptide.[17] The peptide was removed from the solid support, and the boronic
acid was deprotected simultaneously using a cleavage cocktail based
on trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). After purification by high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC), the pure peptide 1a was
characterized by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS, Figure S6). In order to synthesize the fluorescent
Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA (Depsi(coumarin 343-isoleucine)phenylboronic acid-serine-alanine),
the Fmoc group was removed using piperidine and the peptide was modified
with coumarin 343 using PyBOP/DIPEA for activation before cleavage
of the peptide from the solid support. The identity of the product 1b was confirmed after HPLC purification by ESI-MS (Figure S9), which also showed that the peptide
was isolated in high purity.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Depsipeptides Depsi(Fmoc-I)pba-SA 1a and
Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b by Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis
Synthesis of Depsipeptides Depsi(Fmoc-I)pba-SA 1a and
Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b by Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis
(i) Piperidine, (ii) Fmoc-Serine,
PyBOP, DIPEA, (iii) 4-(nitrophenyl)phenylboronic acid pinacol ester,
DIPEA, (iv) Fmoc-isoleucine, DIC, DMAP, (v) TFA, triisopropylsilane,
H2O, (vi) piperidine, (vii) coumarin 343, PyBOP, DIPEA.In order to prove the hydrogen peroxide-induced
removal of the
PBA protecting group and the subsequent O,N-acyl
shift in solution outside cells, Depsi(Fmoc-I)pba-SA 1a was incubated in NH4HCO3 buffer pH 7.4 with
and without hydrogen peroxide (Figure a–c, Figure S15).
The peptide (RT = 15.6 min) was stable
in the absence of H2O2 and led to only 3% conversion
into Fmoc-ISA 3a (RT = 14.6
min) within 45 h due to slow hydrolysis of the carbamate bond. In
contrast, addition of hydrogen peroxide led to a yield of 94% Fmoc-ISA 3a in the same time. The intermediate Depsi(Fmoc-I)-SA 2a could also be observed by the appearance of a peak at 14.0
min, which started to decrease after 8 h, while the product peak of 3a increased. The same study was performed using Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b, and the results showed that both the removal of the phenylboronic
acid by H2O2 as well as the O,N-acyl shift were successful for the coumarin derivative of the peptide
(Figures e and S16). After 4 h, Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b (RT = 6.9 min) was no longer present,
while the peaks for Depsi(C343-I)-SA 2b (RT = 5.0 min) and the linear peptide C343-ISA 3b (RT = 6.2 min) increased. After 24 h
only 3b was found in the sample. Incubation of Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b in NH4HCO3 buffer without H2O2 led to formation of only 3% of the linear peptide 3b, which proves the stability of the peptide under these
conditions (Figure d).
Figure 2
Hydrogen peroxide induced peptide fiber formation. (a) Phenylboronic
acid removal of Depsi(R*-I)pba-SA peptides 1a and 1b and subsequent O,N-acyl shift to give R*-ISA 3a and 3b (R* = Fmoc or coumarin 343). (b) HPLC spectra
at different time points showing the stability of Depsi(Fmoc-I)pba-SA 1a (15.6 min) in NH4HCO3 buffer and
reference spectrum of Fmoc-ISA 3a (14.6 min). (c) H2O2 (2 mM) induced removal of the boronic acid to
give Depsi(Fmoc-I)SA 2a (14.0 min) and linearization
of the peptide to Fmoc-ISA 3a (14.6 min). (d) Stability
of Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b (6.9 min) in buffer, and HPLC
spectrum of C343-ISA 3b (6.2 min). (e) H2O2 (1 mM) induced PBA removal and O,N-acyl shift of Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b (6.9 min) to first give Depsi(C343-I)SA 2b (5.0 min) and finally C343-ISA 3b (6.2 min). TEM images
of (f) Depsi(Fmoc-I)pba-SA 1a, (g) Fmoc-ISA 3a, (h) Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b, (i) C343-ISA 3b, (j) coincubation of Fmoc-ISA 3a and C343-ISA 3b 5:1. Scale bars 500 nm. (k) Fluorescence microscope images
of Fmoc-ISA:C343-ISA 3a:3b 5:1. (Left) Coumarin
343 channel (cyan). (Middle) Proteostat stained peptide fibers (yellow).
(Right) Merged Proteostat and coumarin 343 channel showing the overlay
of the fluorescent dyes (green). Scale bars 20 μm. (l) Circular
dichroism spectra of Fmoc-ISA (orange), C434-ISA (red), and their
differently prepared assemblies in H2O (coassembled, green;
mixed, blue). Fmoc/C343-ISA (calculated, dashed purple line) is the
sum of the separately recorded spectra of Fmoc-ISA and C343-ISA at
a ratio of 5:1 to match the experimental conditions. Region of interest
is highlighted in gray.
Hydrogen peroxide induced peptide fiber formation. (a) Phenylboronic
acid removal of Depsi(R*-I)pba-SA peptides 1a and 1b and subsequent O,N-acyl shift to give R*-ISA 3a and 3b (R* = Fmoc or coumarin 343). (b) HPLC spectra
at different time points showing the stability of Depsi(Fmoc-I)pba-SA 1a (15.6 min) in NH4HCO3 buffer and
reference spectrum of Fmoc-ISA 3a (14.6 min). (c) H2O2 (2 mM) induced removal of the boronic acid to
give Depsi(Fmoc-I)SA 2a (14.0 min) and linearization
of the peptide to Fmoc-ISA 3a (14.6 min). (d) Stability
of Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b (6.9 min) in buffer, and HPLC
spectrum of C343-ISA 3b (6.2 min). (e) H2O2 (1 mM) induced PBA removal and O,N-acyl shift of Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b (6.9 min) to first give Depsi(C343-I)SA 2b (5.0 min) and finally C343-ISA 3b (6.2 min). TEM images
of (f) Depsi(Fmoc-I)pba-SA 1a, (g) Fmoc-ISA 3a, (h) Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b, (i) C343-ISA 3b, (j) coincubation of Fmoc-ISA 3a and C343-ISA 3b 5:1. Scale bars 500 nm. (k) Fluorescence microscope images
of Fmoc-ISA:C343-ISA 3a:3b 5:1. (Left) Coumarin
343 channel (cyan). (Middle) Proteostat stained peptide fibers (yellow).
(Right) Merged Proteostat and coumarin 343 channel showing the overlay
of the fluorescent dyes (green). Scale bars 20 μm. (l) Circular
dichroism spectra of Fmoc-ISA (orange), C434-ISA (red), and their
differently prepared assemblies in H2O (coassembled, green;
mixed, blue). Fmoc/C343-ISA (calculated, dashed purple line) is the
sum of the separately recorded spectra of Fmoc-ISA and C343-ISA at
a ratio of 5:1 to match the experimental conditions. Region of interest
is highlighted in gray.TEM measurements of Depsi(Fmoc-I)pba-SA 1a in phosphate
buffer pH 7.4 after 24 h incubation with and without hydrogen peroxide
showed the oxidation-triggered self-assembly of the peptide due to
formation of the linear fibrillating sequence Fmoc-ISA 3a, while the corresponding boronic acid-modified depsipeptide 1a did not form peptide fibers (Figure f and 2g). In order
to determine the critical fibrillation concentration of Fmoc-ISA 3a, which is important for intracellular fiber formation,
Fmoc-ISA was incubated at different concentrations ranging from 2
mM to 15 μM for 24 h in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). In
TEM measurements, the lowest detectable concentration of peptide fibers
was 62.5 μM (Figure S26).The
fluorescent peptideDepsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b was
synthesized in order to enable live cell imaging of the peptide fibers
by coassembly of both intracellularly rearranged peptides. While incubation
of Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b in phosphate buffer did not
lead to fiber formation, addition of H2O2 led
to the appearance of amorphous aggregates in TEM (Figure h and 2i). Coincubation of both PBAdepsipeptides upon hydrogen peroxide
treatment at a ratio of 5:1 of 1a:1b led to a mixture
of fibers and some aggregates (Figure j). Preliminary confirmation of coassembly was accomplished
by fluorescence microscopy, demonstrating the colocalization of the
coumarin 343 signal with Proteostat, which detects cross-β-sheet-containing
peptide fibers (Figure k).[19,20,24,25]Next, we elucidated the secondary structure
of Fmoc-ISA as it is
the primary driving force for fiber formation. To address this question,
we performed Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy measurements
(Figure S29). The results indicated formation
of β-sheets due to the appearance of a maximum at 1634 cm–1. Another maximum at 1688 cm–1 is
usually assigned to antiparallel β-sheets in proteins but recently
has been reported to derive from the carbamate bond of the Fmoc group.
A shoulder which appeared at 1653 cm–1 in the FT-IR
spectrum might be assigned to either α-helices or disordered
structures.[26−29]13C (1H) CP-MAS NMR spectra (cross-polarization-magic
angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance) confirmed formation of
three different competing structures by showing two sharp peaks and
one broad peak for the Fmoc carbonyl as well as several overlapping
peaks for the C=O groups of the amino acids (Figure S30).For additional proof of coassembly of both
peptides, circular dichroism
spectroscopy was used to visualize changes in the secondary structure
(Figure l). The CD
spectrum of Fmoc-ISA 3a in water showed a maximum at
218 nm, which can be attributed to a n → π*
transition, and a shoulder peak at ∼209 nm was observed in
the CD spectrum as well as a minimum at 190 nm.[30] Notably, a strong positive Cotton effect was observed with
a maximum at 267 nm, which corresponds to the π → π*
transition of the Fmoc groups in the self-assembled peptide fibers.[18] In contrast, the CD spectrum of C343-ISA 3b revealed a maximum at 195 nm and a minimum at 215 nm with
opposite ellipticity compared to 3a. In proteins these
signals are attributed to β-sheets and correspond to π
→ π* and n → π* transitions,
respectively.[31] For coassembly, the study
was accomplished using two different sample preparation methods: (1)
the individual peptides (3a and 3b) were
first mixed before triggering the coassembly in H2O, and
(2) the separate peptide assemblies are preformed in H2O, and the resultant nanostructures are combined. Mixing of the preformed
nanostructures leads to the appearance of an additional shoulder peak
at ∼235 nm and an overall decrease in signal intensities. This
effect is larger than expected from the spectral sum of a 5:1 mixture
of 3a:3b, which represents the hypothetical
spectrum in the absence of interactions between 3a and 3b. Hence, the results indicate interactions at the nanostructure
level, causing a decrease in chirality of the assemblies. Upon coincubation
of both peptides to induce coassembly, the intensities of the maxima
and minima are further decreased significantly, which also includes
signals attributed to electronic transitions of the Fmoc groups. This
is especially visible in the change of peak proportions at 218 and
at 206 nm where the latter was previously observed as a shoulder at
∼209 nm. We conclude that upon coassembly of 3a and 3b, the overall structural chirality of the peptide
assemblies is decreased, leading to a comparable CD spectrum of 3a due to the 5-fold excess but with distinct differences
in ellipticity.[32−34]In order to provide cellular uptake of depsipeptides 1a/b, a salicylhydroxamate-functionalized TAT peptide 12 was needed. TAT, which has the amino acid sequence YGRKKRRQRRR,
was synthesized by standard SPPS methods and was modified with 4-pentynoic
acid on its N-terminus to give molecule 11 (Figure S11). After a copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne
cycloaddition (CuAAC) with trityl (Trt)- and (2-methoxyethoxy)methoxy
(MEM)-protected 4-azido salicylhydroxamate 10, which
was synthesized in seven synthetic steps (Figure S1), the peptide was cleaved from the solid support and purified
by HPLC. After isolation of the pure peptideSHA-TAT 12, it was characterized by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (matrix-assisted
laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight, Figure S13).Attachment of the transporter peptide TAT was accomplished
by boronic
acid/salicyl hydroxamate chemistry. Formation of the dynamic covalent
bond between the boronic acid-functionalized depsipeptides 1a and 1b and SHA-TAT 12 in phosphate buffer
pH 7.4 was proven by MALDI-TOF measurements for both Fmoc- and C343-modified
peptides 1a and 1b. Both products were formed
by condensation of PBA and SHA, and multiple cation adducts were observed
in the spectra (Figure a and 3b). Fluorescence quenching experiments
with Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b and SHA-TAT 12 gave an KD of 2.67 μM, which was
expected due to previously reported results for SHA-PBA complexes
(Figure c).[35] Reversibility of the complexation was accomplished
at pH 5, which results in the recovery of fluorescence (Figure S31). The binding and release were confirmed
by previous reports by our group to transport proteins into cells.[36,37]
Figure 3
Complexes
of SHA-TAT 12 and the boronic acid depsipeptides 1a and 1b. (a) Chemical structure of dynamic
covalently bound SHA-TAT and boronic acid-modified depsipeptide conjugates 13a and 13b. (b) MALDI spectra showing the successful
formation of complexes of SHA-TAT 12 with Depsi(Fmoc-I)pba-SA 1a (top) and Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b (bottom).
[M‘] corresponds to the molecular weight after loss of OH–. [M‘] = [M–OH–]. (c)
Determination of the KD of the SHA-TAT
complex with Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA (13b) by fluorescence
quenching.
Complexes
of SHA-TAT 12 and the boronic aciddepsipeptides 1a and 1b. (a) Chemical structure of dynamic
covalently bound SHA-TAT and boronic acid-modified depsipeptide conjugates 13a and 13b. (b) MALDI spectra showing the successful
formation of complexes of SHA-TAT 12 with Depsi(Fmoc-I)pba-SA 1a (top) and Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA 1b (bottom).
[M‘] corresponds to the molecular weight after loss of OH–. [M‘] = [M–OH–]. (c)
Determination of the KD of the SHA-TAT
complex with Depsi(C343-I)pba-SA (13b) by fluorescence
quenching.Alongside the acidification-induced
release of the pro-assembling
sequence 1a/b from the TAT complexes 13a/b inside endosomes, the H2O2 stimulus is required
for assembly. The average concentration of H2O2 within A549 cells was assayed using the Intracellular Hydrogen Peroxide
Assay Kit from Sigma-Aldrich and found to be 1.64 ± 0.16 μM
(Figure S 57). Stimulation of H2O2 production can be performed with 100 nM of phorbol-12-myristat-13-acetate
(PMA),[38] affording a 49% increase to 2.45
± 0.37 μM. Using these conditions, the TAT-complexed depsipeptides13a/b were incubated with A549 cells, and successful cellular
uptake was shown by confocal microscopy (Figure a). The concentration of the depsipeptides
was adjusted to 150 μM in total to meet the requirements of
the critical fibrillation concentration. The depsipeptides were used
at a ratio of 5:1 (13a:13b) in order to
receive a sufficient fluorescence signal by coumarin 343 inside cells
while maintaining an excess of the Fmoc peptides to direct fiber formation.
Incubation of cells with only the depsipeptides 1a and 1b did not show internalization of the peptides, which proves
the necessity of SHA-TAT 12 for cellular uptake (Figure a, top row). The
increase in fluorescence intensity of coumarin 343 in the presence
of PMA suggests local accumulation of fluorescent 3b upon
fiber formation, indicating that the coassembly was more pronounced
at higher concentrations of H2O2, although as
shown in Figures S47 and S48, peptide fiber
formation also occurs without PMA. Significant cell deformation and
nuclear condensation imply that cell viability is significantly affected
(Figures S38, S39, and S41). Incubation
of the peptide samples with the cells for 2 h showed less cellular
uptake, while extending it to 6 h led to more internalization of the
peptides (Figure S34). Peptide-treated
cells were also examined under higher magnification, where fibrillar
structures inside the cell were visible in the coumarin 343 channel
(Figure S35). A striking observation was
the inefficient staining of the nucleus in cells where the postulated
assembly has occurred. This phenomenon has already been described
in the literature, where formation of peptide fibers inside cells
prevented the staining of nuclei as nuclear stains were trapped inside
fibrillar networks.[39]
Figure 4
Cellular uptake and intracellular
coassembly of peptides. (a) Confocal
laser scanning micrographs of A549 cells treated for 4 h with only
the depsipeptide mixture of 1a and 1b (top
row) and treated with addition of SHA-TAT 12 to induce
cellular uptake without (middle row) and with PMA (bottom row). Scale
bars 20 μm. (b) Förster resonance energy transfer studies
on A549 cells with 15a/b using coumarin343 (donor, cyan)
and 5-FAM (acceptor, red) as FRET pairs. Scale bars 20 μm, λex = 405 nm.
Cellular uptake and intracellular
coassembly of peptides. (a) Confocal
laser scanning micrographs of A549 cells treated for 4 h with only
the depsipeptide mixture of 1a and 1b (top
row) and treated with addition of SHA-TAT 12 to induce
cellular uptake without (middle row) and with PMA (bottom row). Scale
bars 20 μm. (b) Förster resonance energy transfer studies
on A549 cells with 15a/b using coumarin343 (donor, cyan)
and 5-FAM (acceptor, red) as FRET pairs. Scale bars 20 μm, λex = 405 nm.We subsequently explored
the mechanisms involved in each step of
intracellular transport using time-lapsed Förster resonance
energy transfer (FRET) and colocalization studies. TAT was labeled
with 5-FAM (compound 14) serving as the FRET acceptor
for coumarin 343 (Figure S14). Using this
FRET-labeled variant of 13a/b, named 15a/b, we performed confocal microscopy at 1 and 4 h time points (Figure c). At 1 h, uptake
of 15a/b can be visualized as punctuated spots characteristic
of vesicle-based intracellular transport. A significant proportion
of these vesicles exhibits FRET signals (red), suggesting that most
of the uptaken 15a/b has not undergone dissociation.
Nonetheless, a first indication of release into the cytosol was observed
for a small proportion of these vesicles. At 4 h, among cells that
are still intact, assembly has been accomplished in large areas of
the cells. In these regions, FRET signals are absent, suggesting that 15a/b has been mostly dissociated into 1a/b and
TAT 14 followed by the peroxide-driven cascade. However,
remaining amounts of undissociated 15a/b could be observed
to proceed further along the TAT transportation pathway into the nuclear
region. Here, the complex remains bound as the pH within the nucleus
is no longer acidic.[40] The transport pathway
through TAT-promoted endocytosis was confirmed using early/late endosome
studies with CellLight, which saw major colocalization (Figure S37).In addition, endosomal escape
could also be visualized as diffused
coumarin 343 signals in the cytosol. Furthermore, nuclear transport
of undissociated peptides 13a/b, demonstrated by SYTO
RNASelect Green, was found to be localized inside the nucleolus, most
likely due to the electrostatic attraction between TAT and DNA/RNA
or perhaps hydrophobic interactions with the depsipeptides (Figure S40).[41] A previous
report showed that self-assembling peptides might interact with RNA
located inside the nucleoli.[42] In order
to ascertain that the H2O2-driven assembly is
specific toward the cytosol, we monitored the fiber formation using
TEM at pH 5.0, 6.0, and 7.4 (Figures S23 and S25). At both acidic pH values, corresponding to the early and late
endosomes as well as lysosomes, H2O2 does not
possess enough oxidative strength to initiate the reaction cascade
for assembly. This pH-dependent activity of H2O2 was reported in the literature.[43] As
such, the acidic conditions within the endosomes specifically trigger
the dissociation of 13a/b, while the cytosolic environment
provides the condition for the oxidative cascade to initiate fiber
formation. To demonstrate the molecular rearrangement of the depsipeptides
inside cells, we analyzed cell lysates by HPLC and showed the H2O2-induced conversion of 1b to 3b (Figure S49).The biological
response of the cells to the intracellular assembly
was subsequently investigated by Annexin-V/propidium iodide assay
(Figure a). Annexin-V
is a protein that binds to phosphatidylserine, which is located on
the external leaflet of the membrane structures exclusively during
apoptosis.[44] The assay was conducted after
2 and 4 h on A549 cells treated with 13a/b.
Figure 5
(a) Apoptosis
assay using Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide on 13a/b and
PMA-treated A549 cells over 2 and 4 h. Binding of
Annexin V (green) toward the cell membrane was observed prominently
at 2 h, demonstrating cells undergoing apoptosis due to inversion
of the phosphatidylserine motifs. Membrane collapse at 4 h was detected
with the entry of propidium iodide (red) into the nucleus. Scale bars
20 μm. (b) Cell viability of depsipeptides 1a and 1b and/or TAT 12-treated A549 cells determined
by CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay. Cells were treated
for different incubation times from 2 to 6 h with only the depsipeptides 1a and 1b, only SHA-TAT 12, or both
to create 13a and 13b at a concentration
of 150 μM. Significant cytotoxic effect was observed for A549
cells treated with the depsipeptide–TAT complexes 13a and 13b. All samples were coincubated with 100 nM PMA.
(a) Apoptosis
assay using Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide on 13a/b and
PMA-treated A549 cells over 2 and 4 h. Binding of
Annexin V (green) toward the cell membrane was observed prominently
at 2 h, demonstrating cells undergoing apoptosis due to inversion
of the phosphatidylserine motifs. Membrane collapse at 4 h was detected
with the entry of propidium iodide (red) into the nucleus. Scale bars
20 μm. (b) Cell viability of depsipeptides 1a and 1b and/or TAT 12-treated A549 cells determined
by CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay. Cells were treated
for different incubation times from 2 to 6 h with only the depsipeptides 1a and 1b, only SHA-TAT 12, or both
to create 13a and 13b at a concentration
of 150 μM. Significant cytotoxic effect was observed for A549
cells treated with the depsipeptide–TAT complexes 13a and 13b. All samples were coincubated with 100 nM PMA.At 2 h, Annexin-V was found to bind prominently
to the cell membranes,
indicating that affected cells are undergoing apoptosis. At this time
frame, the integrity of the cell membrane still remains intact as
propidium iodide failed to enter the cells. In contrast, at 4 h, propidium
iodide signals were observed in the nuclear region due to its affinity
toward DNA.[44] This observation represented
the membrane permeabilization process associated with late-stage apoptosis.
Analysis of cytotoxicity was accomplished using CellTiter-Glo luminescent
cell viability assay, which is based on quantification of adenosine
triphosphate (ATP) and therefore actively metabolizing cells.[45] No significant toxic effects were observed after
incubation of 1a/b at a concentration of 150 μM
for 6 h with A549 cells (Figure b). However, upon complexing with TAT to form 13a/b, a significant impact toward cell viability was observed.
Only 14% of cells was viable after 6 h, while incubation for 4 or
2 h led to a viability of 34% and 66%, respectively. As the A549cancer
cells do produce intrinsic H2O2, transformation
of 1a/b into 3a/b still occurs in cells
which are not treated with PMA, and therefore, the cell viability
without PMA was 40% after 4 h (Figure S56), which is similar to the cell viability with addition of PMA. As
the increase of hydrogen peroxide concentration by PMA stimulation
(49%) does not cause a significant difference in cell viability, we
conclude that nonstimulated cells already offer enough H2O2 to generate sufficient peptide fibers leading to effective
apoptosis. In addition, as known from β-amyloid structures,
we believe that shorter fibers/protofibrils can already contribute
to the apoptotic effects.[46]Lastly,
to visualize the intracellular fiber formation directly, 13a/b-treated cells were fixed by high-pressure freezing,
and subsequently, freeze substitution was performed using acetone.
After infiltration with epoxy resin and its polymerization, sample
blocks were sectioned into slices. The slices of the cells were examined
in TEM (Figure a and
6b). Formation of many dense peptide fiber
networks was clearly visible inside the cells. Peptide fibrils were
distributed inside the cell and were also observed to form next to
the nucleus and mitochondria. To further show the formation of fibers,
cells were lysed after treatment with the sample and the cell lysate
was analyzed by TEM and fluorescence microscopy (Figure c and 6d).
Figure 6
Intracellular peptide fiber formation. (a and b) TEM micrographs
of peptide fibers inside A549 cells (marked with dashed lines) after
coassembly of intracellularly generated Fmoc-ISA 3a and
C343-ISA 3b and images of a cell, which were received
after stitching TEM images together. Scale bars 500 nm. (c) Fluorescence
microscopy images of Proteostat-stained peptide fibers after formation
inside cells and extraction from the cells by lysis. Scale bars 5
μm. (d) TEM micrographs of peptide fibers, which were received
after lysis of depsipeptide TAT complex 13a- and 13b-treated A549 cells. Scale bars 500 nm.
Intracellular peptide fiber formation. (a and b) TEM micrographs
of peptide fibers inside A549 cells (marked with dashed lines) after
coassembly of intracellularly generated Fmoc-ISA 3a and
C343-ISA 3b and images of a cell, which were received
after stitching TEM images together. Scale bars 500 nm. (c) Fluorescence
microscopy images of Proteostat-stained peptide fibers after formation
inside cells and extraction from the cells by lysis. Scale bars 5
μm. (d) TEM micrographs of peptide fibers, which were received
after lysis of depsipeptide TAT complex 13a- and 13b-treated A549 cells. Scale bars 500 nm.Fibers were observed in TEM, which further proved the successful
assembly of 3a/b inside cells. Furthermore, Proteostat
staining of the cell lysate clearly showed formation of amyloid, cross-ß-sheet
structures to which Proteostat is known to bind, and coumarin 343
fluorescent fibers could also be observed in the lysate (Figures S45 and S46). Due to the resolution in
the fluorescence microscope, only very thick fibers could be found
in the cell lysate. Cell lysates of cells which were not treated with
PMA but only with the complexes 13a/b also contained
fibers, which shows that enhancing the intracellular H2O2 concentration with PMA is not necessary to induce peptide
assembly, as cells naturally already produce hydrogen peroxide (Figures S47 and S48).[33] TEM images of cells as well as cell lysate of A549 cells, which
were not treated with the depsipeptide-TAT complexes 13a and 13b, did not show fibrillar structures, which demonstrates
that fibers derived from the coassembly of the intracellularly rearranged
peptides Fmoc-ISA 3a and C343-ISA 3b (Figures S44, S54, and S55).
Conclusions
In
summary, we designed a peptide sequence that provides synthetic
components for controlling cellular entry, intracellular dissociation,
and supramolecular assembly. The reactivity of each synthetic component
within the peptide sequence is dictated by the intracellular localization
where its immediate environment defines its chemistry and subsequent
transport pathway. Consecutive reactions are initiated in a controlled
fashion to afford coassembling sequences that form fibrillar structures
within the cytosol. Formation of these superstructures was imaged
by fluorescence and electron microscopy and led to programmed cell
death accompanied by nuclear fragmentation, actin disruption, and
membrane collapse. Furthermore, coassembly features the potential
of the nanosystem to dynamically customize functions and/or components
to tune additional biological behavior. Collectively, the platform
provides a broad accessibility and expands the domain of nanotechnology
to directly impact living systems through structure formation.
Authors: Conor C Horgan; Alexandra L Rodriguez; Rui Li; Kiara F Bruggeman; Nicole Stupka; Jared K Raynes; Li Day; John W White; Richard J Williams; David R Nisbet Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Hideki Nakamura; Albert A Lee; Ali Sobhi Afshar; Shigeki Watanabe; Elmer Rho; Shiva Razavi; Allister Suarez; Yu-Chun Lin; Makoto Tanigawa; Brian Huang; Robert DeRose; Diana Bobb; William Hong; Sandra B Gabelli; John Goutsias; Takanari Inoue Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Pablo G Argudo; Rafael Contreras-Montoya; Luis Álvarez de Cienfuegos; Juan M Cuerva; Manuel Cano; David Alba-Molina; María T Martín-Romero; Luis Camacho; Juan J Giner-Casares Journal: Soft Matter Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 3.679
Authors: Gang Wei; Zhiqiang Su; Nicholas P Reynolds; Paolo Arosio; Ian W Hamley; Ehud Gazit; Raffaele Mezzenga Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 54.564