Literature DB >> 32812350

Comparison between touchscreen operant chambers and water maze to detect early prefrontal dysfunction in mice.

Lore Van den Broeck1, Annerieke Sierksma2, Pierre Hansquine1, David Thonnard1, Zsuzsanna Callaerts-Vegh1, Rudi D'Hooge1.   

Abstract

The relative lack of sensitive and clinically valid tests of rodent behavior might be one of the reasons for the limited success of the clinical translation of preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) research findings. There is a general interest in innovative behavioral methodology, and protocols have been proposed for touchscreen operant chambers that might be superior to existing cognitive assessment methods. We assessed and analyzed touchscreen performance in several novel ways to examine the possible occurrence of early signs of prefrontal (PFC) functional decline in the APP/PS1 mouse model of AD. Touchscreen learning performance was compared between APP/PS1-21 mice and wildtype littermates on a C57BL/6J background at 3, 6 and 12 months of age in parallel to the assessment of spatial learning, memory and cognitive flexibility in the Morris water maze (MWM). We found that older mice generally needed more training sessions to complete the touchscreen protocol than younger ones. Older mice also displayed defects in MWM working memory performance, but touchscreen protocols detected functional changes beginning at 3 months of age. Histological changes in PFC of APP/PS1 mice indeed occurred as early as 3 months. Our results suggest that touchscreen operant protocols are more sensitive to PFC dysfunction, which is of relevance to the use of these tasks and devices in preclinical AD research and experimental pharmacology.
© 2020 International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Morris water maze; mouse models of Alzheimer's disease; reversal learning; spatial learning and memory; touchscreen operant chambers; visual discrimination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32812350     DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  5 in total

1.  Editorial: Home Cage-Based Phenotyping in Rodents: Innovation, Standardization, Reproducibility and Translational Improvement.

Authors:  Stefano Gaburro; York Winter; Maarten Loos; Jeansok J Kim; Oliver Stiedl
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 2.  Using touchscreen-delivered cognitive assessments to address the principles of the 3Rs in behavioral sciences.

Authors:  Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida; Christopher J Heath; Laura Lopez-Cruz
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 12.625

3.  Touchscreen response technology and the power of stimulus-based approaches in freely behaving animals.

Authors:  Alicia Izquierdo
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  Longitudinal Assessment of Working Memory Performance in the APPswe/PSEN1dE9 Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease Using an Automated Figure-8-Maze.

Authors:  Fran C van Heusden; Sara Palacín I Bonsón; Oliver Stiedl; August B Smit; Ronald E van Kesteren
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  A Preclinical Model of Computerized Cognitive Training: Touchscreen Cognitive Testing Enhances Cognition and Hippocampal Cellular Plasticity in Wildtype and Alzheimer's Disease Mice.

Authors:  Amy Shepherd; Tracy Zhang; Lucas B Hoffmann; Ariel M Zeleznikow-Johnston; Leonid Churilov; Anthony J Hannan; Emma L Burrows
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.